Text2Quit: An analysis of user experiences with a mobile smoking cessation program.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2020-03-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-08 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2019.22
L C Abroms, C L Heminger, A L Boal, J M Van Alstyne, N Krishnan
{"title":"Text2Quit: An analysis of user experiences with a mobile smoking cessation program.","authors":"L C Abroms, C L Heminger, A L Boal, J M Van Alstyne, N Krishnan","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2019.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown that Text2Quit and other mobile cessation programs increase quit rates in adult smokers, but the mechanism of effects and user experiences are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study reports on participants' experiences with the program and explores aspects of the program that they liked and disliked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-reported experiences of the program were collected through a follow-up survey conducted one month after enrollment (n=185). Participant responses to open-ended items were dual coded by independent coders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall participants agreed that they liked the program (4.2/5), that the program was helpful (4.1/5) and that they would recommend the program to a friend (4.3/5). Top reasons for liking the program included that it served as a constant reminder of quitting (17.8%), the content (16.7%), the encouragement provided (13.3%), and the on-demand tools (12.2%). Top reasons for disliking the program were message frequency (20.5%), content (7.0%), and the lack of personal interaction (7.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The constancy of messaging was both liked as a reminder and disliked as an annoyance. Future programs might be improved by pre-testing and customizing the content based on user preferences, and by adding in human interactions, while keeping a supportive tone and offering on-demand tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"15 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994940/pdf/nihms-1541196.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2019.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that Text2Quit and other mobile cessation programs increase quit rates in adult smokers, but the mechanism of effects and user experiences are not well understood.

Aims: This study reports on participants' experiences with the program and explores aspects of the program that they liked and disliked.

Methods: Self-reported experiences of the program were collected through a follow-up survey conducted one month after enrollment (n=185). Participant responses to open-ended items were dual coded by independent coders.

Results: Overall participants agreed that they liked the program (4.2/5), that the program was helpful (4.1/5) and that they would recommend the program to a friend (4.3/5). Top reasons for liking the program included that it served as a constant reminder of quitting (17.8%), the content (16.7%), the encouragement provided (13.3%), and the on-demand tools (12.2%). Top reasons for disliking the program were message frequency (20.5%), content (7.0%), and the lack of personal interaction (7.0%).

Conclusions: The constancy of messaging was both liked as a reminder and disliked as an annoyance. Future programs might be improved by pre-testing and customizing the content based on user preferences, and by adding in human interactions, while keeping a supportive tone and offering on-demand tools.

Text2Quit:手机戒烟程序用户体验分析。
简介研究表明,Text2Quit 和其他手机戒烟程序提高了成年吸烟者的戒烟率,但其效果机制和用户体验还不甚了解:方法:通过在注册一个月后进行的跟踪调查,收集参与者(185 人)对该计划的自我体验报告。参与者对开放式项目的回答由独立编码员进行双重编码:总的来说,参与者一致认为他们喜欢该计划(4.2/5),该计划很有帮助(4.1/5),并且他们会向朋友推荐该计划(4.3/5)。喜欢该计划的主要原因包括:它能不断提醒人们戒烟(17.8%)、内容(16.7%)、提供的鼓励(13.3%)和按需工具(12.2%)。不喜欢该计划的主要原因是信息频率(20.5%)、内容(7.0%)和缺乏个人互动(7.0%):结论:信息的持续性既能起到提醒作用,也会给人带来烦恼。在保持支持性语气和提供按需工具的同时,可通过预先测试、根据用户偏好定制内容以及增加人际互动来改进未来的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信