En-bloc resection of urinary bladder tumour - a prospective controlled multicentre observational study.

Sławomir Poletajew, Wojciech Krajewski, Paweł Stelmach, Jan Adamowicz, Łukasz Nowak, Marco Moschini, Piotr Zapała, Tomasz Drewa, Andrzej Paradysz, Piotr Radziszewski, Romuald Zdrojowy, Piotr Kryst
{"title":"En-bloc resection of urinary bladder tumour - a prospective controlled multicentre observational study.","authors":"Sławomir Poletajew,&nbsp;Wojciech Krajewski,&nbsp;Paweł Stelmach,&nbsp;Jan Adamowicz,&nbsp;Łukasz Nowak,&nbsp;Marco Moschini,&nbsp;Piotr Zapała,&nbsp;Tomasz Drewa,&nbsp;Andrzej Paradysz,&nbsp;Piotr Radziszewski,&nbsp;Romuald Zdrojowy,&nbsp;Piotr Kryst","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2020.95399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures. Because of the shortcomings of conventional TURBT, the en-bloc resection concept was created.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse the influence of en-bloc technique on surgical and oncological outcomes of TURBT performed with electric current.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This non-randomized, prospective controlled multicentre study enrolled 427 consecutive patients undergoing TURBT performed by five experienced endourologists in five academic institutions. Choice of procedure was at the discretion of the surgeon. The vast majority of patients underwent monopolar resection. The en-bloc procedure was performed with Collin's knife or the classic resection loop. Study end-points were surgery, catheterization and hospitalization time, presence of muscularis propria (MP) in the specimen and 3-month recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 427 (274 conventional TURBT vs. 153 en-bloc) patients with mean age of 69 years (range: 18-99). There were more cases with MP present in the specimen in the en-bloc group (91.3% vs. 75.5%; p < 0.001). Surgery and hospitalization times were statistically shorter in the en-bloc group (both p < 0.05). A borderline significant difference was noted when the number of residual tumours in reTURBTs was analysed, with fewer cases of residual tumour in the en-bloc group (p = 0.051). RFS at 3 months was higher in the en-bloc group (88.4% vs. 80.1%; p = 0.027). After propensity score matching, differences in MP presence, hospitalization time and 3-month RFS status remained statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to conventional TURBT, en-bloc resection of bladder tumour is associated with higher percentage of MP presence in histopathological specimen, higher 3-month RFS and shorter hospitalization time.</p>","PeriodicalId":520827,"journal":{"name":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","volume":" ","pages":"145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/96/WIITM-16-40689.PMC7991935.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.95399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures. Because of the shortcomings of conventional TURBT, the en-bloc resection concept was created.

Aim: To analyse the influence of en-bloc technique on surgical and oncological outcomes of TURBT performed with electric current.

Material and methods: This non-randomized, prospective controlled multicentre study enrolled 427 consecutive patients undergoing TURBT performed by five experienced endourologists in five academic institutions. Choice of procedure was at the discretion of the surgeon. The vast majority of patients underwent monopolar resection. The en-bloc procedure was performed with Collin's knife or the classic resection loop. Study end-points were surgery, catheterization and hospitalization time, presence of muscularis propria (MP) in the specimen and 3-month recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results: The study included 427 (274 conventional TURBT vs. 153 en-bloc) patients with mean age of 69 years (range: 18-99). There were more cases with MP present in the specimen in the en-bloc group (91.3% vs. 75.5%; p < 0.001). Surgery and hospitalization times were statistically shorter in the en-bloc group (both p < 0.05). A borderline significant difference was noted when the number of residual tumours in reTURBTs was analysed, with fewer cases of residual tumour in the en-bloc group (p = 0.051). RFS at 3 months was higher in the en-bloc group (88.4% vs. 80.1%; p = 0.027). After propensity score matching, differences in MP presence, hospitalization time and 3-month RFS status remained statistically significant.

Conclusions: When compared to conventional TURBT, en-bloc resection of bladder tumour is associated with higher percentage of MP presence in histopathological specimen, higher 3-month RFS and shorter hospitalization time.

Abstract Image

膀胱肿瘤整体切除-一项前瞻性对照多中心观察性研究。
简介:经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)是最常见的泌尿外科手术之一。针对传统TURBT的不足,提出了整体切除的概念。目的:分析整体技术对电流行TURBT手术及肿瘤预后的影响。材料和方法:这项非随机、前瞻性对照的多中心研究招募了427名连续接受TURBT的患者,由5名经验丰富的内分泌科医生在5个学术机构进行。手术的选择由外科医生自行决定。绝大多数患者行单极切除。整体手术采用柯林刀或经典切除环。研究终点为手术、置管和住院时间、标本中固有肌层(MP)的存在以及3个月无复发生存期(RFS)。结果:该研究纳入427例(274例常规TURBT vs 153例整体)患者,平均年龄为69岁(范围:18-99岁)。整体组标本中出现MP的病例较多(91.3% vs. 75.5%;P < 0.001)。分组组手术时间和住院时间较分组组短(p < 0.05)。当分析returts中残留肿瘤的数量时,注意到一个临界显著差异,整体组中残留肿瘤的病例较少(p = 0.051)。整体组3个月时的RFS更高(88.4% vs. 80.1%;P = 0.027)。倾向评分匹配后,MP存在、住院时间和3个月RFS状态的差异仍有统计学意义。结论:与常规TURBT相比,膀胱肿瘤整体切除与组织病理标本中MP的存在率更高、3个月RFS更高、住院时间更短相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信