Short versus long biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Zhigang Ke, Fan Li, Yu Gao, Xunmei Zhou, Fang Sun, Li Wang, Jing Chen, Xin Tan, Zhiming Zhu, Weidong Tong
{"title":"Short versus long biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Zhigang Ke,&nbsp;Fan Li,&nbsp;Yu Gao,&nbsp;Xunmei Zhou,&nbsp;Fang Sun,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Xin Tan,&nbsp;Zhiming Zhu,&nbsp;Weidong Tong","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2020.99997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is still widely accepted as a valid procedure in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there continues to be a significant controversy about how long the Roux and biliopancreatic limb should be bypassed for optimum results.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effect of a longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on glycemic control after RYGB in T2DM patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighty-four patients with uncontrolled T2DM who underwent RYGB between May 2010 and April 2017 were collected from the prospectively designed database. Forty patients (S-BPL group) received BPL lengths ≤ 50 cm, including 30 cm (n = 1), 40 cm (n = 1), and 50 cm (n = 38). Forty-four patients (L-BPL group) received 100 cm BPL. Anthropometry, serum glucose and lipid metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the two groups, there were no significant differences in anthropometric and biochemical measures, except the weight and body mass index, which were higher in the S-BPL group (85.91 ±20.32 vs. 76.25 ±16.99, p = 0.038; 31.87 ±6.61 vs. 28.7 ±4.29, p = 0.005) compared to the L-BPL group. The body weight, glucose and lipid metabolic parameters decreased over time and then remained essentially stable from the first year in both groups. Two years after surgery, the remission (HbA<sub>1c</sub>% ≤ 6%) of T2DM was 31.2% in the S-BPL group and 37.5% in the L-BPL group (p = 0.685).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With consistent total small bowel bypass (AL + BPL) lengths, lengthening of the BPL from 30 to 100 cm did not affect the post-RYGB glycemic control and weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":520827,"journal":{"name":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","volume":" ","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/2e/WIITM-16-42091.PMC7991953.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.99997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is still widely accepted as a valid procedure in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there continues to be a significant controversy about how long the Roux and biliopancreatic limb should be bypassed for optimum results.

Aim: To assess the effect of a longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on glycemic control after RYGB in T2DM patients.

Material and methods: Eighty-four patients with uncontrolled T2DM who underwent RYGB between May 2010 and April 2017 were collected from the prospectively designed database. Forty patients (S-BPL group) received BPL lengths ≤ 50 cm, including 30 cm (n = 1), 40 cm (n = 1), and 50 cm (n = 38). Forty-four patients (L-BPL group) received 100 cm BPL. Anthropometry, serum glucose and lipid metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery.

Results: Comparing the two groups, there were no significant differences in anthropometric and biochemical measures, except the weight and body mass index, which were higher in the S-BPL group (85.91 ±20.32 vs. 76.25 ±16.99, p = 0.038; 31.87 ±6.61 vs. 28.7 ±4.29, p = 0.005) compared to the L-BPL group. The body weight, glucose and lipid metabolic parameters decreased over time and then remained essentially stable from the first year in both groups. Two years after surgery, the remission (HbA1c% ≤ 6%) of T2DM was 31.2% in the S-BPL group and 37.5% in the L-BPL group (p = 0.685).

Conclusions: With consistent total small bowel bypass (AL + BPL) lengths, lengthening of the BPL from 30 to 100 cm did not affect the post-RYGB glycemic control and weight loss.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术治疗2型糖尿病的胆胰短肢与长肢比较。
导论:尽管腹腔镜Roux-en- y胃旁路术(RYGB)仍被广泛接受为治疗肥胖和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的有效方法,但Roux和胆管胰部旁路多长时间才能达到最佳效果仍存在重大争议。目的:探讨延长胆胰肢(BPL)长度对T2DM患者RYGB术后血糖控制的影响。材料和方法:从前瞻性设计的数据库中收集了2010年5月至2017年4月期间接受RYGB治疗的84例未控制的T2DM患者。40例患者(S-BPL组)接受长度≤50 cm的BPL,包括30 cm (n = 1)、40 cm (n = 1)和50 cm (n = 38)。44例患者(L-BPL组)行100 cm BPL。在基线及术后1、3、6、12、24和36个月测量人体测量、血清葡萄糖和脂代谢参数。结果:两组比较,除体重和体质指数(85.91±20.32∶76.25±16.99)高于S-BPL组(p = 0.038)外,两组在人体测量和生化指标上均无显著差异;(31.87±6.61)vs(28.7±4.29,p = 0.005)。两组患者的体重、葡萄糖和脂质代谢参数随着时间的推移而下降,然后从第一年开始基本保持稳定。术后2年,S-BPL组T2DM缓解(HbA1c%≤6%)为31.2%,L-BPL组为37.5% (p = 0.685)。结论:在全小肠旁路(AL + BPL)长度一致的情况下,BPL从30 cm延长到100 cm不会影响rygb后的血糖控制和体重减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信