Abdominal rebleeding after transcatheter arterial embolization for ruptured pseudoaneurysms associated with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.

Min Ai, DaZhi Gao, GuangMing Lu, Jian Xu
{"title":"Abdominal rebleeding after transcatheter arterial embolization for ruptured pseudoaneurysms associated with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Min Ai,&nbsp;DaZhi Gao,&nbsp;GuangMing Lu,&nbsp;Jian Xu","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2020.97426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients are at risk of abdominal rebleeding after transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for pancreatitis-related pseudoaneurysm, which increases the mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the effects of an intestinal fistula (IF) and the anatomical location of the pseudoaneurysm on abdominal rebleeding after TAE of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm associated with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From February 2013 to November 2019, 24 patients with SAP-related pseudoaneurysm rupture and hemorrhage in our hospital underwent TAE. All patients' epidemiological data and related medical histories were collected and statistically analyzed. We classified the pseudoaneurysms as type I, II, and III according to their anatomical locations and as type A (without an IF) and type B (with an IF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type I pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 6 patients, endoscopic necrotic tissue removal in 5, and surgical necrotic tissue removal or enterostomy in none, with a rebleeding rate of 33.3% (3/9 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type II pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 7 patients, endoscopy in three, and surgery in one, with a rebleeding rate of 20.0% (2/10 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type III pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 3 patients, endoscopy in 1, and surgery in 2, with a rebleeding rate of 80.0% (4/5 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the types of interventions for abdominal infection among patients with type I, II, and III pseudoaneurysms (p = 0.355) or in the rate of abdominal rebleeding after TAE for type III pseudoaneurysms (p = 0.111). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type A pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 13 patients, endoscopy in 6, and surgery in 1, with a rebleeding rate of 22.2% (4/18 patients) and mortality rate of 11.1% (2/18 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type B pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 3 patients, endoscopy in 3, and surgery in 2, with a rebleeding rate of 83.3% (5/6 patients) and mortality rate of 66.7% (4/6 patients). There was no significant difference in the types of interventions for abdominal infection in patients with and without IF (p = 0.215); however, the rebleeding rate and mortality rate were significantly higher in patients with IF (p = 0.015 and 0.018, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IF may increase the rate of abdominal rebleeding after TAE for ruptured SAP-related pseudoaneurysms, while the anatomical location of the pseudoaneurysm may not affect the rate of rebleeding after TAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":520827,"journal":{"name":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","volume":" ","pages":"83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/26/WIITM-16-41371.PMC7991941.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.97426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Patients are at risk of abdominal rebleeding after transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for pancreatitis-related pseudoaneurysm, which increases the mortality rate.

Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of an intestinal fistula (IF) and the anatomical location of the pseudoaneurysm on abdominal rebleeding after TAE of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm associated with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

Material and methods: From February 2013 to November 2019, 24 patients with SAP-related pseudoaneurysm rupture and hemorrhage in our hospital underwent TAE. All patients' epidemiological data and related medical histories were collected and statistically analyzed. We classified the pseudoaneurysms as type I, II, and III according to their anatomical locations and as type A (without an IF) and type B (with an IF).

Results: The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type I pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 6 patients, endoscopic necrotic tissue removal in 5, and surgical necrotic tissue removal or enterostomy in none, with a rebleeding rate of 33.3% (3/9 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type II pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 7 patients, endoscopy in three, and surgery in one, with a rebleeding rate of 20.0% (2/10 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type III pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 3 patients, endoscopy in 1, and surgery in 2, with a rebleeding rate of 80.0% (4/5 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the types of interventions for abdominal infection among patients with type I, II, and III pseudoaneurysms (p = 0.355) or in the rate of abdominal rebleeding after TAE for type III pseudoaneurysms (p = 0.111). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type A pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 13 patients, endoscopy in 6, and surgery in 1, with a rebleeding rate of 22.2% (4/18 patients) and mortality rate of 11.1% (2/18 patients). The interventions for abdominal infection in patients with type B pseudoaneurysms were percutaneous drainage in 3 patients, endoscopy in 3, and surgery in 2, with a rebleeding rate of 83.3% (5/6 patients) and mortality rate of 66.7% (4/6 patients). There was no significant difference in the types of interventions for abdominal infection in patients with and without IF (p = 0.215); however, the rebleeding rate and mortality rate were significantly higher in patients with IF (p = 0.015 and 0.018, respectively).

Conclusions: IF may increase the rate of abdominal rebleeding after TAE for ruptured SAP-related pseudoaneurysms, while the anatomical location of the pseudoaneurysm may not affect the rate of rebleeding after TAE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经导管动脉栓塞治疗严重急性胰腺炎相关假性动脉瘤破裂后腹部再出血:一项回顾性研究。
导言:胰腺炎相关性假性动脉瘤经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)后患者有腹部再出血的危险,这增加了死亡率。目的:本研究旨在评估肠瘘(IF)和假性动脉瘤的解剖位置对严重急性胰腺炎(SAP)并发假性动脉瘤破裂TAE后腹部再出血的影响。材料与方法:2013年2月至2019年11月,我院24例sap相关性假性动脉瘤破裂出血患者行TAE治疗。收集所有患者的流行病学资料及相关病史并进行统计分析。我们根据假性动脉瘤的解剖位置将其分为I型、II型和III型,并将其分为A型(无IF)和B型(有IF)。结果:I型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施为经皮引流6例,内镜下坏死组织切除5例,无手术坏死组织切除或肠造口术,再出血率为33.3%(3/9)。II型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施为经皮引流7例,内镜3例,手术1例,再出血率为20.0%(2/10)。III型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施为经皮引流3例,内镜1例,手术2例,再出血率为80.0%(4/5例)。I型、II型和III型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施类型差异无统计学意义(p = 0.355), III型假性动脉瘤TAE术后腹部再出血率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.111)。A型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施为经皮引流13例,内镜6例,手术1例,再出血率为22.2%(4/18),死亡率为11.1%(2/18)。B型假性动脉瘤患者腹部感染的干预措施为经皮引流3例、内镜3例、手术2例,再出血率为83.3%(5/6),死亡率为66.7%(4/6)。有和没有IF的患者对腹部感染的干预类型无显著差异(p = 0.215);然而,IF患者的再出血率和死亡率显著高于IF患者(p分别= 0.015和0.018)。结论:假性动脉瘤破裂后假性动脉瘤经TAE后腹腔再出血发生率可能增加,假性动脉瘤的解剖位置可能不影响TAE后再出血发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信