Retrospective cross sectional analysis of demographic disparities in outcomes of CPR performed by EMS providers in the United States.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2021-03-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040211000619
Tess Hill, Thomas Weber, Marshall Roberts, Hernando Garzon, Alvaro Fraga, Craig Wetterer, Jose Puglisi
{"title":"Retrospective cross sectional analysis of demographic disparities in outcomes of CPR performed by EMS providers in the United States.","authors":"Tess Hill,&nbsp;Thomas Weber,&nbsp;Marshall Roberts,&nbsp;Hernando Garzon,&nbsp;Alvaro Fraga,&nbsp;Craig Wetterer,&nbsp;Jose Puglisi","doi":"10.1177/20480040211000619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate demographic disparities in prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation and successful outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by emergency medical services (EMS) providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Emergency Medical Service Information Systems (NEMSIS) 2017 database, analyzing patient gender, age and race against CPR initiation and Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC). The analysis was performed for a subset of patients who received bystander interventions (n = 3,362), then repeated for the whole cohort of patients (n = 5,833).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the subgroup of patients that received CPR or AED application prior to the arrival of the paramedics, a logistic regression for CPR initiation rates as a function of race, gender and age reported the following adjusted odds ratios: African American (AA) to White 0.570 (95%CI [0.419, 0.775]), Hispanic to White 0.735 (95%CI [0.470, 1.150]); female to male 0.768 (95%CI [0.598, 0.986]); senior to adult 0.708 (95%CI [0.545, 0.920). Similarly, a logistic regression of ROSC as a function of race, gender and age reported the following adjusted odds ratios: AA to White 0.652 (95%CI [0.533, 0.797]) Hispanic to White 1.018 (95%CI [0.783, 1.323]); female to male 0.887 (95%CI [0.767, 1.025]); senior to adult 0.817 (95%CI [0.709, 0.940]). Similar trends existed in the entire cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that there are discrepancies in patient care during cardiopulmonary arrest performed by EMS for OHCA, inviting further exploration of healthcare differences in the prehospital EMS approach to OHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"20480040211000619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20480040211000619","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211000619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To investigate demographic disparities in prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation and successful outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by emergency medical services (EMS) providers.

Methods: We analyzed the National Emergency Medical Service Information Systems (NEMSIS) 2017 database, analyzing patient gender, age and race against CPR initiation and Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC). The analysis was performed for a subset of patients who received bystander interventions (n = 3,362), then repeated for the whole cohort of patients (n = 5,833).

Results: Within the subgroup of patients that received CPR or AED application prior to the arrival of the paramedics, a logistic regression for CPR initiation rates as a function of race, gender and age reported the following adjusted odds ratios: African American (AA) to White 0.570 (95%CI [0.419, 0.775]), Hispanic to White 0.735 (95%CI [0.470, 1.150]); female to male 0.768 (95%CI [0.598, 0.986]); senior to adult 0.708 (95%CI [0.545, 0.920). Similarly, a logistic regression of ROSC as a function of race, gender and age reported the following adjusted odds ratios: AA to White 0.652 (95%CI [0.533, 0.797]) Hispanic to White 1.018 (95%CI [0.783, 1.323]); female to male 0.887 (95%CI [0.767, 1.025]); senior to adult 0.817 (95%CI [0.709, 0.940]). Similar trends existed in the entire cohort of patients.

Conclusions: These results suggest that there are discrepancies in patient care during cardiopulmonary arrest performed by EMS for OHCA, inviting further exploration of healthcare differences in the prehospital EMS approach to OHCA.

美国EMS提供者实施CPR结果的人口统计学差异的回顾性横断面分析。
目的:探讨急诊医疗服务(EMS)院前心脏骤停(OHCA)患者院前心肺复苏(CPR)启动和成功结局的人口统计学差异。方法:对国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS) 2017数据库进行分析,分析患者的性别、年龄和种族与CPR启动和自然循环恢复(ROSC)的关系。对接受旁观者干预的患者(n = 3,362)进行分析,然后对整个队列患者(n = 5,833)重复分析。结果:在护理人员到达前接受心肺复苏术或AED应用的患者亚组中,心肺复苏术启动率作为种族、性别和年龄函数的逻辑回归报告了以下调整优势比:非裔美国人(AA)对白人0.570 (95%CI[0.419, 0.775]),西班牙裔对白人0.735 (95%CI [0.470, 1.150]);男女比0.768 (95%CI [0.598, 0.986]);老年至成人0.708 (95%CI[0.545, 0.920])。同样,ROSC作为种族、性别和年龄函数的逻辑回归报告了以下调整后的优势比:AA对White为0.652 (95%CI [0.533, 0.797]), Hispanic对White为1.018 (95%CI [0.783, 1.323]);男女比0.887 (95%CI [0.767, 1.025]);老年至成人为0.817 (95%CI[0.709, 0.940])。在整个队列患者中也存在类似的趋势。结论:以上结果提示EMS对OHCA的心肺骤停患者护理存在差异,值得进一步探讨院前EMS对OHCA的护理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信