Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests?

IF 2.6 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2021-03-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/HMER.S278077
Elton Dajti, Luigina Vanessa Alemanni, Giovanni Marasco, Marco Montagnani, Francesco Azzaroli
{"title":"Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests?","authors":"Elton Dajti,&nbsp;Luigina Vanessa Alemanni,&nbsp;Giovanni Marasco,&nbsp;Marco Montagnani,&nbsp;Francesco Azzaroli","doi":"10.2147/HMER.S278077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal hypertension is the main driver of complications in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG) >5 mmHg. Values of HVPG ≥10 mmHg determine the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), the main predictor of the risk of variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, its measurement is invasive and requires high expertise, so its routine use outside third level centers or clinical trials is limited. In the last decades, several non-invasive tests (NITs) have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Among these, liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) are the most promising tools available, as they have been proven accurate to predict CSPH, high-risk esophageal varices, decompensation, and mortality in patients with ACLD. In the last Baveno VI Consensus proceedings, LSM evaluation was recommended for the first time for diagnosis of CSPH (LSM >20-25 kPa) and the screening of patients with a low probability of having high-risk varices (LSM <20 kPa and platelet count >150.000/mm<sup>3</sup>). In this review, we aimed to summarize the growing evidence supporting the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12917,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/c5/hmer-13-25.PMC7987277.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S278077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Portal hypertension is the main driver of complications in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG) >5 mmHg. Values of HVPG ≥10 mmHg determine the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), the main predictor of the risk of variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, its measurement is invasive and requires high expertise, so its routine use outside third level centers or clinical trials is limited. In the last decades, several non-invasive tests (NITs) have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Among these, liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) are the most promising tools available, as they have been proven accurate to predict CSPH, high-risk esophageal varices, decompensation, and mortality in patients with ACLD. In the last Baveno VI Consensus proceedings, LSM evaluation was recommended for the first time for diagnosis of CSPH (LSM >20-25 kPa) and the screening of patients with a low probability of having high-risk varices (LSM <20 kPa and platelet count >150.000/mm3). In this review, we aimed to summarize the growing evidence supporting the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease.

门静脉高压症的诊断方法:无创检查还是有创检查?
门脉高压是晚期慢性肝病(ACLD)患者并发症的主要驱动因素,其定义为肝静脉压梯度测量值(HVPG) >5 mmHg。HVPG值≥10 mmHg可确定是否存在临床意义的门脉高压(CSPH),这是静脉曲张出血、肝脏失代偿和死亡风险的主要预测因子。然而,它的测量是侵入性的,需要很高的专业知识,因此在三级中心或临床试验之外的常规使用受到限制。在过去的几十年里,一些非侵入性检查(NITs)已经发展并验证了门静脉高压症的诊断。其中,肝脏(LSM)和脾脏刚度测量(SSM)是最有前途的工具,因为它们已被证明可以准确预测CSPH、高风险食管静脉曲张、代偿失代偿和ACLD患者的死亡率。在最近的Baveno VI共识会议中,LSM评估首次被推荐用于CSPH (LSM >20-25 kPa)的诊断和高风险静脉曲张(LSM 150.000/mm3)低概率患者的筛查。在这篇综述中,我们旨在总结越来越多的证据支持使用非侵入性检查来评估慢性肝病患者的门静脉高压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric hepatology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of hepatic disease Investigation and treatment of hepatic disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of hepatic disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered. As of 1st April 2019, Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信