Evaluation of Ongoing Participation of People with Schizophrenia in a Mutual Support Group as a Complementary Intervention to Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment.

The Psychiatric quarterly Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s11126-021-09893-z
José Alberto Orsi, Fernando Rocha Loures Malinowski, Simão Kagan, Richard Weingarten, Cecília Cruz Villares, Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan, Walter Ferreira de Oliveira, Mário César Rezende Andrade, Ary Gadelha
{"title":"Evaluation of Ongoing Participation of People with Schizophrenia in a Mutual Support Group as a Complementary Intervention to Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment.","authors":"José Alberto Orsi,&nbsp;Fernando Rocha Loures Malinowski,&nbsp;Simão Kagan,&nbsp;Richard Weingarten,&nbsp;Cecília Cruz Villares,&nbsp;Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan,&nbsp;Walter Ferreira de Oliveira,&nbsp;Mário César Rezende Andrade,&nbsp;Ary Gadelha","doi":"10.1007/s11126-021-09893-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate a group of people with schizophrenia undergoing outpatient treatment and who participate in a mutual support intervention, compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, but attending only the usual outpatient treatment. This is a prospective study, with two measurements between six months. The mutual support group was initially composed of 16 people and the treatment as usual group was composed of 15 people. Clinical (medication adherence and functioning) and Recovery (hope, well-being, recovery and internalized stigma) outcomes were assessed. Nonparametric tests were used to verify differences in measurements between groups and between two moments. A higher level of internalized stigma and a decrease in the adherence to drug treatment in the treatment as usual group were verified. When comparing the pre-post difference between groups, there was a greater increase in adherence to drug treatment in the mutual support group. Our data point to more favorable results in the mutual support group, showing that ongoing participation in these groups is an important tool for the recovery process and for the treatment itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":520814,"journal":{"name":"The Psychiatric quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"1283-1296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11126-021-09893-z","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychiatric quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09893-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate a group of people with schizophrenia undergoing outpatient treatment and who participate in a mutual support intervention, compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, but attending only the usual outpatient treatment. This is a prospective study, with two measurements between six months. The mutual support group was initially composed of 16 people and the treatment as usual group was composed of 15 people. Clinical (medication adherence and functioning) and Recovery (hope, well-being, recovery and internalized stigma) outcomes were assessed. Nonparametric tests were used to verify differences in measurements between groups and between two moments. A higher level of internalized stigma and a decrease in the adherence to drug treatment in the treatment as usual group were verified. When comparing the pre-post difference between groups, there was a greater increase in adherence to drug treatment in the mutual support group. Our data point to more favorable results in the mutual support group, showing that ongoing participation in these groups is an important tool for the recovery process and for the treatment itself.

精神分裂症患者持续参与互助小组作为精神科门诊治疗的补充干预的评估。
本研究旨在评估一组接受门诊治疗并参与相互支持干预的精神分裂症患者,与另一组诊断相同但只接受常规门诊治疗的患者进行比较。这是一项前瞻性研究,在六个月内进行两次测量。相互支持组最初由16人组成,正常治疗组由15人组成。评估临床(药物依从性和功能)和康复(希望、幸福、康复和内化耻辱)结果。非参数检验用于验证组间和两个矩之间测量值的差异。在常规治疗组中,有较高水平的内化耻辱感和药物治疗依从性的降低。当比较两组之间的前后差异时,相互支持组对药物治疗的依从性增加更大。我们的数据表明,相互支持小组的结果更有利,表明持续参与这些小组是恢复过程和治疗本身的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信