{"title":"Associations Between Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Propensity Analysis.","authors":"An-Min Hu, Chao Hai, Hai-Bo Wang, Zhongheng Zhang, Ling-Bin Sun, Zhong-Jun Zhang, Hui-Ping Li","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000001774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown nonlinear relationships between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and outcomes, with increased risk observed at both low and high blood pressure levels. However, the relationships between cumulative times at different SBP levels and outcomes in critically ill patients remain unclear. We hypothesized that an appropriate SBP level is associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database, which includes more than 1,000,000 SBP records from 12,820 patients. Associations of cumulative times at four SBP ranges (<100 mm Hg, 100-120 mm Hg, 120-140 mm Hg, and ≥140 mm Hg) with mortality (12-, 3-, 1-month mortality and in-hospital mortality) were evaluated. Restricted cubic splines and multivariable Cox regression models were employed to assess associations between mortality and cumulative times at SBP levels (4 levels: <2, 2-12, 12-36, and ≥36 h) over 72 h of ICU admission. Additionally, 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg was subdivided into <12 h (Group L) and ≥12 h (Group M) subsets and subjected to propensity-score matching and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg, level-4 SBP was associated with lower adjusted risks of mortality at 12 months (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.61-0.81), 3 months (OR, 0.72; CI, 0.61-0.85), and 1 month (OR, 0.61; CI, 0.48-0.79) and in the hospital (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.58-0.88) than level-1 SBP. The cumulative times at the other 3 SBP ranges (<100 mm Hg, 100-120 mm Hg, and ≥140 mm Hg) were not independent risk predictors of prognosis. Furthermore, Group M had lower 12-month mortality than Group L, which remained in the propensity-score matched and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBP at 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg was associated with decreased adverse outcomes. Randomized trials are required to determine whether the outcomes in critically ill patients improve with early maintenance of a SBP level at 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg.</p>","PeriodicalId":238832,"journal":{"name":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","volume":" ","pages":"557-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have shown nonlinear relationships between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and outcomes, with increased risk observed at both low and high blood pressure levels. However, the relationships between cumulative times at different SBP levels and outcomes in critically ill patients remain unclear. We hypothesized that an appropriate SBP level is associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database, which includes more than 1,000,000 SBP records from 12,820 patients. Associations of cumulative times at four SBP ranges (<100 mm Hg, 100-120 mm Hg, 120-140 mm Hg, and ≥140 mm Hg) with mortality (12-, 3-, 1-month mortality and in-hospital mortality) were evaluated. Restricted cubic splines and multivariable Cox regression models were employed to assess associations between mortality and cumulative times at SBP levels (4 levels: <2, 2-12, 12-36, and ≥36 h) over 72 h of ICU admission. Additionally, 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg was subdivided into <12 h (Group L) and ≥12 h (Group M) subsets and subjected to propensity-score matching and subgroup analyses.
Results: At 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg, level-4 SBP was associated with lower adjusted risks of mortality at 12 months (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.61-0.81), 3 months (OR, 0.72; CI, 0.61-0.85), and 1 month (OR, 0.61; CI, 0.48-0.79) and in the hospital (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.58-0.88) than level-1 SBP. The cumulative times at the other 3 SBP ranges (<100 mm Hg, 100-120 mm Hg, and ≥140 mm Hg) were not independent risk predictors of prognosis. Furthermore, Group M had lower 12-month mortality than Group L, which remained in the propensity-score matched and subgroup analyses.
Conclusions: SBP at 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg was associated with decreased adverse outcomes. Randomized trials are required to determine whether the outcomes in critically ill patients improve with early maintenance of a SBP level at 120 mm Hg to 140 mm Hg.
研究表明收缩压(SBP)与预后之间存在非线性关系,在低血压和高血压水平下均观察到风险增加。然而,不同收缩压水平累积时间与危重患者预后之间的关系尚不清楚。我们假设适当的收缩压水平与重症监护病房(ICU)入院后不良后果的减少有关。方法:本研究对重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC) III数据库的数据进行回顾性分析,该数据库包括来自12,820例患者的1,000,000多条收缩压记录。4个收缩压范围累积时间的相关性(结果:在120 mm Hg至140 mm Hg时,4级收缩压与12个月时较低的调整后死亡风险相关(OR, 0.71;CI, 0.61-0.81), 3个月(OR, 0.72;CI, 0.61-0.85)和1个月(OR, 0.61;CI, 0.48-0.79)和在医院(OR, 0.71;CI, 0.58-0.88)高于1级收缩压。其他3个收缩压范围的累积时间(结论:收缩压在120 mm Hg至140 mm Hg时与不良后果的减少有关。需要随机试验来确定早期将收缩压维持在120 ~ 140 mm Hg是否能改善危重患者的预后。