Insight into the current practice of ototoxicity monitoring during cisplatin therapy.

IF 2.2
N M Santucci, B Garber, R Ivory, M A Kuhn, M Stephen, D Aizenberg
{"title":"Insight into the current practice of ototoxicity monitoring during cisplatin therapy.","authors":"N M Santucci,&nbsp;B Garber,&nbsp;R Ivory,&nbsp;M A Kuhn,&nbsp;M Stephen,&nbsp;D Aizenberg","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00506-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the current state of ototoxicity monitoring for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy in an academic medical center with particular attention to how closely monitoring adheres to national ototoxicity guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case series including retrospective medical records review of patients (age > 18) treated with cisplatin at University of California Davis Medical Center between January 2014 and August 2017. Patient and ototoxicity related variables were analyzed. Patients that underwent a transfer of care during treatment and with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seventy-nine patients met study criteria, of which 104 (27.4%) had a prior history of hearing loss. Prior to treatment, 196 (51.7%) patients were counseled regarding the ototoxic nature of cisplatin and 92 (24.3%) patients had a pretreatment audiogram. During treatment, 91 (24%) patients had documented otologic complaints. Only 17 patients (4.5%) patients had an audiogram ordered during their cisplatin treatment period. 130 (34.3%) patients had otologic complaints following cisplatin treatment. Audiograms were ordered for 20 (7.8%), 13 (5.1%), and 16 (6.2%) patients at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups, respectively. No patients in the study cohort received baseline, treatment, and post-treatment audiograms as recommended by national ototoxicity monitoring protocols. Patients with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) represented the largest subgroup that received cisplatin (n = 122, 32.2%) and demonstrated higher rates of ototoxicity counseling (n = 103, 84.4%) and pretreatment audiograms (n = 70, 57.4%) compared to the non HNC group (n = 36, 36.2%, P < 0.0001 and n = 22, 8.5%, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is poor adherence to national ototoxicity monitoring guidelines at a large academic medical center. This is a missed opportunity for intervention and aural rehabilitation. Improved education and collaboration between otolaryngology, audiology, and medical oncology is needed to develop and promote an effective ototoxicity-monitoring program.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00506-0","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00506-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the current state of ototoxicity monitoring for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy in an academic medical center with particular attention to how closely monitoring adheres to national ototoxicity guidelines.

Methods: Case series including retrospective medical records review of patients (age > 18) treated with cisplatin at University of California Davis Medical Center between January 2014 and August 2017. Patient and ototoxicity related variables were analyzed. Patients that underwent a transfer of care during treatment and with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded.

Results: Three hundred seventy-nine patients met study criteria, of which 104 (27.4%) had a prior history of hearing loss. Prior to treatment, 196 (51.7%) patients were counseled regarding the ototoxic nature of cisplatin and 92 (24.3%) patients had a pretreatment audiogram. During treatment, 91 (24%) patients had documented otologic complaints. Only 17 patients (4.5%) patients had an audiogram ordered during their cisplatin treatment period. 130 (34.3%) patients had otologic complaints following cisplatin treatment. Audiograms were ordered for 20 (7.8%), 13 (5.1%), and 16 (6.2%) patients at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups, respectively. No patients in the study cohort received baseline, treatment, and post-treatment audiograms as recommended by national ototoxicity monitoring protocols. Patients with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) represented the largest subgroup that received cisplatin (n = 122, 32.2%) and demonstrated higher rates of ototoxicity counseling (n = 103, 84.4%) and pretreatment audiograms (n = 70, 57.4%) compared to the non HNC group (n = 36, 36.2%, P < 0.0001 and n = 22, 8.5%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: There is poor adherence to national ototoxicity monitoring guidelines at a large academic medical center. This is a missed opportunity for intervention and aural rehabilitation. Improved education and collaboration between otolaryngology, audiology, and medical oncology is needed to develop and promote an effective ototoxicity-monitoring program.

Abstract Image

顺铂治疗期间耳毒性监测的现状。
背景:本研究的目的是评估一个学术医疗中心对接受顺铂化疗的患者耳毒性监测的现状,特别关注监测是否严格遵守国家耳毒性指南。方法:对2014年1月至2017年8月在加州大学戴维斯医学中心接受顺铂治疗的患者(年龄> 18岁)进行回顾性病历回顾。分析患者和耳毒性相关变量。在治疗期间接受转移治疗且随访时间少于3个月的患者被排除在外。结果:379例患者符合研究标准,其中104例(27.4%)有听力损失史。治疗前,196例(51.7%)患者被告知顺铂的耳毒性,92例(24.3%)患者进行了预处理听力学检查。在治疗期间,91例(24%)患者有耳科症状。只有17例(4.5%)患者在顺铂治疗期间进行了听力学检查。130例(34.3%)患者在顺铂治疗后出现耳科不适。分别对20例(7.8%)、13例(5.1%)和16例(6.2%)患者进行1个月、3个月和6个月的随访。研究队列中没有患者接受国家耳毒性监测方案推荐的基线、治疗和治疗后听音图。头颈癌(HNC)患者是接受顺铂治疗的最大亚组(n = 122, 32.2%),与非HNC组(n = 36, 36.2%)相比,其耳毒性咨询(n = 103, 84.4%)和预处理听像图(n = 70, 57.4%)的比例更高。结论:大型学术医疗中心对国家耳毒性监测指南的依从性较差。这是一个错失的干预和听觉康复的机会。需要改进耳鼻喉科、听力学和医学肿瘤学之间的教育和合作,以发展和促进有效的耳毒性监测计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信