Performance of the Wells score in predicting deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical hospitalized patients with or without thromboprophylaxis: The R-WITT study.

Vascular Medicine (London, England) Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1177/1358863X21994672
Jean-Eudes Trihan, Michael Adam, Sara Jidal, Isabelle Aichoun, Sarah Coudray, Jeremy Laurent, Laurent Chaussavoine, Sebastien Chausserie, Jerome Guillaumat, Damien Lanéelle, Antonia Perez-Martin
{"title":"Performance of the Wells score in predicting deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical hospitalized patients with or without thromboprophylaxis: The R-WITT study.","authors":"Jean-Eudes Trihan,&nbsp;Michael Adam,&nbsp;Sara Jidal,&nbsp;Isabelle Aichoun,&nbsp;Sarah Coudray,&nbsp;Jeremy Laurent,&nbsp;Laurent Chaussavoine,&nbsp;Sebastien Chausserie,&nbsp;Jerome Guillaumat,&nbsp;Damien Lanéelle,&nbsp;Antonia Perez-Martin","doi":"10.1177/1358863X21994672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Wells score had shown weak performance to determine pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for inpatients. So, we evaluated the impact of thromboprophylaxis on the utility of the Wells score for risk stratification of inpatients with suspected DVT. This bicentric cross-sectional study from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019 included consecutive medical and surgical inpatients who underwent lower limb ultrasound study for suspected DVT. Wells score clinical predictors were assessed by both ordering and vascular physicians within 24 h after clinical suspicion of DVT. Primary outcome was the Wells score's accuracy for pre-test risk stratification of suspected DVT, accounting for anticoagulation (AC) treatment (thromboprophylaxis for ⩾ 72 hours or long-term anticoagulation). We compared prevalence of proximal DVT among the low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups. The discrimination accuracy was defined as area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Of the 415 included patients, 30 (7.2%) had proximal DVT. Prevalence of proximal DVT was lower than expected in all pre-test probability groups. The prevalence in low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups was 0.0%, 3.1% and 8.2% (<i>p</i> = 0.22) and 1.7%, 4.2% and 25.8% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for inpatients with or without AC, respectively. Area under ROC curves for discriminatory accuracy of the Wells score, for risk of proximal DVT with or without AC, was 0.72 and 0.88, respectively. The Wells score performed poorly for discrimination of risk for proximal DVT in hospitalized patients with AC but performed reasonably well among patients without AC; and showed low inter-rater reliability between physicians. <b>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784937.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":151049,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"288-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1358863X21994672","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X21994672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Wells score had shown weak performance to determine pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for inpatients. So, we evaluated the impact of thromboprophylaxis on the utility of the Wells score for risk stratification of inpatients with suspected DVT. This bicentric cross-sectional study from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019 included consecutive medical and surgical inpatients who underwent lower limb ultrasound study for suspected DVT. Wells score clinical predictors were assessed by both ordering and vascular physicians within 24 h after clinical suspicion of DVT. Primary outcome was the Wells score's accuracy for pre-test risk stratification of suspected DVT, accounting for anticoagulation (AC) treatment (thromboprophylaxis for ⩾ 72 hours or long-term anticoagulation). We compared prevalence of proximal DVT among the low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups. The discrimination accuracy was defined as area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Of the 415 included patients, 30 (7.2%) had proximal DVT. Prevalence of proximal DVT was lower than expected in all pre-test probability groups. The prevalence in low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups was 0.0%, 3.1% and 8.2% (p = 0.22) and 1.7%, 4.2% and 25.8% (p < 0.001) for inpatients with or without AC, respectively. Area under ROC curves for discriminatory accuracy of the Wells score, for risk of proximal DVT with or without AC, was 0.72 and 0.88, respectively. The Wells score performed poorly for discrimination of risk for proximal DVT in hospitalized patients with AC but performed reasonably well among patients without AC; and showed low inter-rater reliability between physicians. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784937.

在有或没有血栓预防的内科和外科住院患者中,Wells评分预测深静脉血栓形成的表现:R-WITT研究
Wells评分在确定住院患者深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的测试前概率方面表现不佳。因此,我们评估了血栓预防对威尔斯评分在住院疑似深静脉血栓患者风险分层中的效用的影响。该双中心横断面研究于2018年2月1日至2019年1月31日期间进行,包括因疑似DVT而接受下肢超声检查的连续内科和外科住院患者。在临床怀疑深静脉血栓形成后24小时内,由医师和血管内科医生评估Wells评分的临床预测指标。主要结果是Wells评分对疑似DVT测试前风险分层的准确性,考虑到抗凝治疗(小于或等于72小时的血栓预防或长期抗凝治疗)。我们比较了低、中、高预测概率组近端DVT的患病率。鉴别准确度定义为受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。在纳入的415例患者中,30例(7.2%)有近端DVT。近端DVT患病率低于所有测试前概率组的预期。低、中、高检前概率组的患病率分别为0.0%、3.1%、8.2% (p = 0.22),有无AC住院患者的患病率分别为1.7%、4.2%、25.8% (p < 0.001)。具有或不具有AC的近端DVT风险的Wells评分的区分准确度的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.72和0.88。Wells评分在区分住院AC患者近端DVT风险方面表现不佳,但在非AC患者中表现相当好;医生之间的可信度也很低。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03784937。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信