Using the theory of constraints' processes of ongoing improvement to address the provider appointment scheduling system execution problem.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
James F Cox
{"title":"Using the theory of constraints' processes of ongoing improvement to address the provider appointment scheduling system execution problem.","authors":"James F Cox","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2019.1646105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many primary care clinics suffer from chaos. In scheduling, providers are continually trying unsuccessfully to balance supply and demand, and in execution, to manage disruptions to provider focus and patient flow. In this research the theory of constraints' (TOC) three processes of ongoing improvement (POOGI) provide a direction for the solution to achieving more, cheaper, better, and faster healthcare. This research is the second of a two-part study examining the appointment scheduling literature, identifying the core problem (using a case study for validation) and providing a generic process for developing effective provider appointment scheduling systems (PASS). In the first part, PASS design was studied and in this second part PASS execution is studied. A strawman process is developed to apply across outpatient medical practices. With this generic process implemented across outpatient scheduling systems cost could be reduced significantly while the quality and timeliness could be increased significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":"41-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2019.1646105","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2019.1646105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many primary care clinics suffer from chaos. In scheduling, providers are continually trying unsuccessfully to balance supply and demand, and in execution, to manage disruptions to provider focus and patient flow. In this research the theory of constraints' (TOC) three processes of ongoing improvement (POOGI) provide a direction for the solution to achieving more, cheaper, better, and faster healthcare. This research is the second of a two-part study examining the appointment scheduling literature, identifying the core problem (using a case study for validation) and providing a generic process for developing effective provider appointment scheduling systems (PASS). In the first part, PASS design was studied and in this second part PASS execution is studied. A strawman process is developed to apply across outpatient medical practices. With this generic process implemented across outpatient scheduling systems cost could be reduced significantly while the quality and timeliness could be increased significantly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用约束过程的持续改进理论,解决了提供者预约调度系统的执行问题。
许多初级保健诊所陷入混乱。在日程安排方面,供应商不断尝试平衡供需,但没有成功;在执行过程中,管理对供应商焦点和患者流量的干扰。在本研究中,约束理论(TOC)的三个持续改进过程(POOGI)为实现更多、更便宜、更好和更快的医疗保健解决方案提供了方向。本研究是两部分研究的第二部分,研究了预约调度文献,确定了核心问题(使用案例研究进行验证),并为开发有效的提供者预约调度系统(PASS)提供了一个通用流程。第一部分研究了PASS设计,第二部分研究了PASS执行。一个稻草人过程被开发应用于门诊医疗实践。在门诊调度系统中实施这一通用流程可以显著降低成本,同时显著提高质量和及时性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信