Daniel Stonehouse-Smith, Aida N A Abd Rahman, Jeanette Mooney, Haydn Bellardie
{"title":"Occlusal Outcome of Orthodontic Treatment for Patients With Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.","authors":"Daniel Stonehouse-Smith, Aida N A Abd Rahman, Jeanette Mooney, Haydn Bellardie","doi":"10.1177/1055665621996116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess occlusal outcomes of orthodontic treatment for patients with complete cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Consecutive patients treated by one consultant orthodontist at a tertiary care cleft center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred twenty-seven patients with either complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) or bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) consecutively treated with fixed appliances.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Fixed orthodontic appliance treatment and orthognathic surgery when required.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The PAR index assessment was carried out by a calibrated-independent assessor. Treatment duration, the number of patient visits, and data on dental anomalies were drawn from patient records and radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred two patients' study models were assessed after exclusions. Mean start PAR score for UCLP (n = 71) was 43.9 (95% CI, 41.2-46.6, SD 11.5), with a mean score reduction of 84.3% (95% CI, 81.9-86.7, SD 10.1). The UCLP mean treatment time was 23.7 months with 20.1 appointments. Mean start PAR score for BCLP (n = 31) was 43.4 (95% CI, 39.2-47.6, SD 11.4), with a mean score reduction of 80.9% (95% CI, 76.3-85.5, SD 12.5). The BCLP mean treatment time was 27.8 months with 20.5 appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results compare well with other outcome reports, including those for patients without a cleft, and reflect the standard of care provided by an experienced cleft orthodontist. As with high-volume surgeons, orthodontic treatment for this high need group is favorable when provided by a high-volume orthodontist. These findings may be used for comparative audit with similar units providing cleft care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1055665621996116","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621996116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Aim: To assess occlusal outcomes of orthodontic treatment for patients with complete cleft lip and palate.
Design: Retrospective assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.
Setting: Consecutive patients treated by one consultant orthodontist at a tertiary care cleft center.
Participants: One hundred twenty-seven patients with either complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) or bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) consecutively treated with fixed appliances.
Intervention: Fixed orthodontic appliance treatment and orthognathic surgery when required.
Outcomes: The PAR index assessment was carried out by a calibrated-independent assessor. Treatment duration, the number of patient visits, and data on dental anomalies were drawn from patient records and radiographs.
Results: One hundred two patients' study models were assessed after exclusions. Mean start PAR score for UCLP (n = 71) was 43.9 (95% CI, 41.2-46.6, SD 11.5), with a mean score reduction of 84.3% (95% CI, 81.9-86.7, SD 10.1). The UCLP mean treatment time was 23.7 months with 20.1 appointments. Mean start PAR score for BCLP (n = 31) was 43.4 (95% CI, 39.2-47.6, SD 11.4), with a mean score reduction of 80.9% (95% CI, 76.3-85.5, SD 12.5). The BCLP mean treatment time was 27.8 months with 20.5 appointments.
Conclusion: These results compare well with other outcome reports, including those for patients without a cleft, and reflect the standard of care provided by an experienced cleft orthodontist. As with high-volume surgeons, orthodontic treatment for this high need group is favorable when provided by a high-volume orthodontist. These findings may be used for comparative audit with similar units providing cleft care.