The mouth matters most: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of how dogs perceive inanimate objects.

The Journal of Comparative Neurology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-25 DOI:10.1002/cne.25142
Ashley Prichard, Raveena Chhibber, Kate Athanassiades, Veronica Chiu, Mark Spivak, Gregory S Berns
{"title":"The mouth matters most: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of how dogs perceive inanimate objects.","authors":"Ashley Prichard,&nbsp;Raveena Chhibber,&nbsp;Kate Athanassiades,&nbsp;Veronica Chiu,&nbsp;Mark Spivak,&nbsp;Gregory S Berns","doi":"10.1002/cne.25142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perception and representation of objects in the world are foundational to all animals. The relative importance of objects' physical properties versus how the objects are interacted with continues to be debated. Neural evidence in humans and nonhuman primates suggests animate-inanimate and face-body dimensions of objects are represented in the temporal cortex. However, because primates have opposable thumbs and interact with objects in similar ways, the question remains as to whether this similarity represents the evolution of a common cognitive process or whether it reflects a similarity of physical interaction. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in dogs to test whether the type of interaction affects object processing in an animal that interacts primarily with its mouth. In Study 1, we identified object-processing regions of cortex by having dogs passively view movies of faces and objects. In Study 2, dogs were trained to interact with two new objects with either the mouth or the paw. Then, we measured responsivity in the object regions to the presentation of these objects. Mouth-objects elicited significantly greater activity in object regions than paw-objects. Mouth-objects were also associated with activity in somatosensory cortex, suggesting dogs were anticipating mouthing interactions. These findings suggest that object perception in dogs is affected by how dogs expect to interact with familiar objects.</p>","PeriodicalId":160000,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Comparative Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"2987-2994"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cne.25142","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Comparative Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The perception and representation of objects in the world are foundational to all animals. The relative importance of objects' physical properties versus how the objects are interacted with continues to be debated. Neural evidence in humans and nonhuman primates suggests animate-inanimate and face-body dimensions of objects are represented in the temporal cortex. However, because primates have opposable thumbs and interact with objects in similar ways, the question remains as to whether this similarity represents the evolution of a common cognitive process or whether it reflects a similarity of physical interaction. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in dogs to test whether the type of interaction affects object processing in an animal that interacts primarily with its mouth. In Study 1, we identified object-processing regions of cortex by having dogs passively view movies of faces and objects. In Study 2, dogs were trained to interact with two new objects with either the mouth or the paw. Then, we measured responsivity in the object regions to the presentation of these objects. Mouth-objects elicited significantly greater activity in object regions than paw-objects. Mouth-objects were also associated with activity in somatosensory cortex, suggesting dogs were anticipating mouthing interactions. These findings suggest that object perception in dogs is affected by how dogs expect to interact with familiar objects.

嘴最重要:一项关于狗如何感知无生命物体的功能性磁共振成像研究。
对世界上物体的感知和表现是所有动物的基础。物体的物理属性与物体如何相互作用的相对重要性仍在争论中。人类和非人类灵长类动物的神经证据表明,物体的动-无生命和脸-身体维度是在颞叶皮层中表征的。然而,由于灵长类动物有对生拇指,并且与物体的互动方式相似,所以这种相似性是否代表了共同认知过程的进化,或者它是否反映了物理互动的相似性,这个问题仍然存在。在这里,我们在狗身上使用功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)来测试交互类型是否会影响主要与嘴交互的动物对物体的处理。在研究1中,我们通过让狗被动地观看人脸和物体的电影来识别皮层的物体处理区域。在研究2中,狗被训练用嘴或爪子与两个新物体互动。然后,我们测量了物体区域对这些物体呈现的反应性。嘴状物体比爪子状物体在物体区域引起更大的活动。与嘴有关的物体也与体感皮层的活动有关,这表明狗会预测到嘴的互动。这些发现表明,狗对物体的感知受到狗期望与熟悉物体互动的方式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书