Costs of Health Service Use among Unemployed and Underemployed People with Mental Health Problems.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tamara Waldmann, Tobias Staiger, Nicolas Ruesch, Reinhold Kilian
{"title":"Costs of Health Service Use among Unemployed and Underemployed People with Mental Health Problems.","authors":"Tamara Waldmann,&nbsp;Tobias Staiger,&nbsp;Nicolas Ruesch,&nbsp;Reinhold Kilian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unemployment is associated with a high risk of experiencing mental illness. This can lead to stigmatisation, reduced quality of life, and long-term costs like increased healthcare expenditure and productivity losses for society as a whole. Previous research indicates evidence for an association between unemployment and higher mental health service costs, but there is insufficient information available for the German healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study aims to identify costs and cost drivers for health and social service use among unemployed people with mental health problems in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 270 persons participated at baseline and six-month-follow-up. Healthcare and social service use was assessed using the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory. Descriptive cost analysis was performed. Associations between costs and potential cost drivers were tested using structural equation modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct mean costs for 12 months range from EUR 1265.13 (somatic costs) to EUR 2206.38 (psychiatric costs) to EUR 3020.70 (total costs) per person. Path coefficients indicate direct positive effects from the latent variable mental health burden (MHB) on stigma stress, somatic symptoms, and sick leave.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The hypothesis that unemployed people with mental health problems seek help for somatic symptoms rather than psychiatric symptoms was not supported. Associations between MHB and costs strongly mediated by sick leave indicate a central function of healthcare provision as being confirmation of the inability to work.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Targeted interventions to ensure early help-seeking and reduce stigma remain of key importance in reducing long-term societal costs.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Future research should explore attitudes regarding effective treatment for the target group.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":"31-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unemployment is associated with a high risk of experiencing mental illness. This can lead to stigmatisation, reduced quality of life, and long-term costs like increased healthcare expenditure and productivity losses for society as a whole. Previous research indicates evidence for an association between unemployment and higher mental health service costs, but there is insufficient information available for the German healthcare system.

Aim of the study: This study aims to identify costs and cost drivers for health and social service use among unemployed people with mental health problems in Germany.

Methods: A sample of 270 persons participated at baseline and six-month-follow-up. Healthcare and social service use was assessed using the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory. Descriptive cost analysis was performed. Associations between costs and potential cost drivers were tested using structural equation modelling.

Results: Direct mean costs for 12 months range from EUR 1265.13 (somatic costs) to EUR 2206.38 (psychiatric costs) to EUR 3020.70 (total costs) per person. Path coefficients indicate direct positive effects from the latent variable mental health burden (MHB) on stigma stress, somatic symptoms, and sick leave.

Discussion: The hypothesis that unemployed people with mental health problems seek help for somatic symptoms rather than psychiatric symptoms was not supported. Associations between MHB and costs strongly mediated by sick leave indicate a central function of healthcare provision as being confirmation of the inability to work.

Implications for health policies: Targeted interventions to ensure early help-seeking and reduce stigma remain of key importance in reducing long-term societal costs.

Implications for further research: Future research should explore attitudes regarding effective treatment for the target group.

有精神健康问题的失业和未充分就业人员使用卫生服务的费用。
背景:失业与经历精神疾病的高风险相关。这可能导致污名化、生活质量下降,以及整个社会的医疗支出增加和生产力损失等长期成本。先前的研究表明,失业与较高的心理健康服务成本之间存在关联,但德国医疗保健系统的可用信息不足。研究目的:本研究旨在确定德国有精神健康问题的失业人员使用健康和社会服务的成本和成本驱动因素。方法:在基线和6个月的随访中,270人参与了研究。使用客户社会人口统计和服务收据清单评估了医疗保健和社会服务的使用情况。进行描述性成本分析。成本和潜在成本驱动因素之间的关联使用结构方程模型进行了测试。结果:12个月的直接平均成本范围从每人1265.13欧元(躯体成本)到2206.38欧元(精神成本)到3020.70欧元(总成本)。路径系数表明,潜在变量心理健康负担(MHB)对病耻感压力、躯体症状和病假有直接的正向影响。讨论:有心理健康问题的失业人员寻求躯体症状而不是精神症状帮助的假设不被支持。MHB与病假介导的成本之间的关联表明,医疗保健提供的核心功能是确认无法工作。对卫生政策的影响:有针对性的干预措施,以确保早期寻求帮助和减少耻辱,在降低长期社会成本方面仍然至关重要。对进一步研究的启示:未来的研究应探讨对目标群体有效治疗的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信