An evaluation of machine learning techniques to predict the outcome of children treated for Hodgkin-Lymphoma on the AHOD0031 trial: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

IF 2.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Applied Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-14 DOI:10.1080/08839514.2020.1815151
Cédric Beaulac, Jeffrey S Rosenthal, Qinglin Pei, Debra Friedman, Suzanne Wolden, David Hodgson
{"title":"An evaluation of machine learning techniques to predict the outcome of children treated for Hodgkin-Lymphoma on the AHOD0031 trial: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.","authors":"Cédric Beaulac, Jeffrey S Rosenthal, Qinglin Pei, Debra Friedman, Suzanne Wolden, David Hodgson","doi":"10.1080/08839514.2020.1815151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this manuscript we analyze a data set containing information on children with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) enrolled on a clinical trial. Treatments received and survival status were collected together with other covariates such as demographics and clinical measurements. Our main task is to explore the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in a survival analysis context in order to improve over the Cox Proportional Hazard (CoxPH) model. We discuss the weaknesses of the CoxPH model we would like to improve upon and then we introduce multiple algorithms, from well-established ones to state-of-the-art models, that solve these issues. We then compare every model according to the concordance index and the brier score. Finally, we produce a series of recommendations, based on our experience, for practitioners that would like to benefit from the recent advances in artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8260,"journal":{"name":"Applied Artificial Intelligence","volume":"34 14","pages":"1100-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963212/pdf/nihms-1637283.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2020.1815151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this manuscript we analyze a data set containing information on children with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) enrolled on a clinical trial. Treatments received and survival status were collected together with other covariates such as demographics and clinical measurements. Our main task is to explore the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in a survival analysis context in order to improve over the Cox Proportional Hazard (CoxPH) model. We discuss the weaknesses of the CoxPH model we would like to improve upon and then we introduce multiple algorithms, from well-established ones to state-of-the-art models, that solve these issues. We then compare every model according to the concordance index and the brier score. Finally, we produce a series of recommendations, based on our experience, for practitioners that would like to benefit from the recent advances in artificial intelligence.

评估机器学习技术,预测 AHOD0031 试验中霍奇金淋巴瘤患儿的治疗效果:儿童肿瘤学小组的报告。
在本手稿中,我们分析了一个数据集,其中包含参加临床试验的霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患儿的信息。我们收集了接受的治疗和生存状况,以及人口统计学和临床测量等其他协变量。我们的主要任务是探索生存分析中机器学习(ML)算法的潜力,以改进 Cox 比例危险(CoxPH)模型。我们将讨论我们希望改进的 CoxPH 模型的不足之处,然后介绍解决这些问题的多种算法,其中既有成熟的算法,也有最先进的模型。然后,我们根据一致性指数和布赖尔评分对每种模型进行比较。最后,我们根据自己的经验提出了一系列建议,供希望从人工智能最新进展中获益的从业人员参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Artificial Intelligence
Applied Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Artificial Intelligence addresses concerns in applied research and applications of artificial intelligence (AI). The journal also acts as a medium for exchanging ideas and thoughts about impacts of AI research. Articles highlight advances in uses of AI systems for solving tasks in management, industry, engineering, administration, and education; evaluations of existing AI systems and tools, emphasizing comparative studies and user experiences; and the economic, social, and cultural impacts of AI. Papers on key applications, highlighting methods, time schedules, person-months needed, and other relevant material are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信