Aortic and mitral flow quantification using dynamic valve tracking and machine learning: Prospective study assessing static and dynamic plane repeatability, variability and agreement.
Julio Garcia, Kailey Beckie, Ali F Hassanabad, Alireza Sojoudi, James A White
{"title":"Aortic and mitral flow quantification using dynamic valve tracking and machine learning: Prospective study assessing static and dynamic plane repeatability, variability and agreement.","authors":"Julio Garcia, Kailey Beckie, Ali F Hassanabad, Alireza Sojoudi, James A White","doi":"10.1177/2048004021999900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood flow is a crucial measurement in the assessment of heart valve disease. Time-resolved flow using magnetic resonance imaging (4 D flow MRI) can provide a comprehensive assessment of heart valve hemodynamics but it relies in manual plane analysis. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of automate the detection and tracking of aortic and mitral valve planes to assess blood flow from 4 D flow MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, a total of <i>n</i> = 106 subjects were enrolled: 19 patients with mitral disease, 65 aortic disease patients and 22 healthy controls. Machine learning was employed to detect aortic and mitral location and motion in a cine three-chamber plane and a perpendicular projection was co-registered to the 4 D flow MRI dataset to quantify flow volume, regurgitant fraction, and a peak velocity. Static and dynamic plane association and agreement were evaluated. Intra- and inter-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aortic regurgitant fraction was elevated in aortic valve disease patients as compared with controls and mitral valve disease patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, mitral regurgitant fraction was higher in mitral valve patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both aortic and mitral total flow were high in aortic patients. Static and dynamic were good (r > 0.6, <i>p</i> < 0.005) for aortic total flow and peak velocity, and mitral peak velocity and regurgitant fraction. All measurements showed good inter- and intra-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that aortic and mitral hemodynamics can efficiently be quantified from 4 D flow MRI using assisted valve detection with machine learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"2048004021999900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004021999900","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004021999900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Background: Blood flow is a crucial measurement in the assessment of heart valve disease. Time-resolved flow using magnetic resonance imaging (4 D flow MRI) can provide a comprehensive assessment of heart valve hemodynamics but it relies in manual plane analysis. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of automate the detection and tracking of aortic and mitral valve planes to assess blood flow from 4 D flow MRI.
Methods: In this prospective study, a total of n = 106 subjects were enrolled: 19 patients with mitral disease, 65 aortic disease patients and 22 healthy controls. Machine learning was employed to detect aortic and mitral location and motion in a cine three-chamber plane and a perpendicular projection was co-registered to the 4 D flow MRI dataset to quantify flow volume, regurgitant fraction, and a peak velocity. Static and dynamic plane association and agreement were evaluated. Intra- and inter-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility were also assessed.
Results: Aortic regurgitant fraction was elevated in aortic valve disease patients as compared with controls and mitral valve disease patients (p < 0.05). Similarly, mitral regurgitant fraction was higher in mitral valve patients (p < 0.05). Both aortic and mitral total flow were high in aortic patients. Static and dynamic were good (r > 0.6, p < 0.005) for aortic total flow and peak velocity, and mitral peak velocity and regurgitant fraction. All measurements showed good inter- and intra-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility.
Conclusion: We demonstrated that aortic and mitral hemodynamics can efficiently be quantified from 4 D flow MRI using assisted valve detection with machine learning.
背景:血流量是评估心脏瓣膜疾病的重要指标。时间分辨流磁共振成像(4d血流MRI)可以提供心脏瓣膜血流动力学的全面评估,但它依赖于人工平面分析。在这项研究中,我们的目的是证明自动检测和跟踪主动脉和二尖瓣平面的可行性,以评估血流从4d血流MRI。方法:本前瞻性研究共纳入106例受试者:二尖瓣疾病患者19例,主动脉疾病患者65例,健康对照22例。机器学习用于检测主动脉和二尖瓣在三维三腔平面上的位置和运动,并将垂直投影与4d血流MRI数据集共同注册,以量化血流体积、反流分数和峰值速度。评估静、动态平面的关联和一致性。还评估了观察者内部和观察者之间以及扫描-扫描的再现性。结果:与对照组和二尖瓣疾病患者相比,主动脉瓣疾病患者的主动脉反流分数升高(p < 0.6, p >)。结论:我们证明利用机器学习辅助瓣膜检测的4d血流MRI可以有效地量化主动脉和二尖瓣血流动力学。