Validation of a Spanish version of a 360° feedback tool for residents' performance: A pilot study.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Josefina Belén Parodi, Alberto Alves de Lima, Lucrecia Maria Burgos, Ricardo J Gelpi
{"title":"Validation of a Spanish version of a 360° feedback tool for residents' performance: A pilot study.","authors":"Josefina Belén Parodi,&nbsp;Alberto Alves de Lima,&nbsp;Lucrecia Maria Burgos,&nbsp;Ricardo J Gelpi","doi":"10.4103/efh.EfH_119_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 360° feedback tool emerges as one of the most effective techniques for the assessment of humanistic qualities and communication skills of medical trainees, providing effective feedback. A valid Spanish version of this tool has not yet been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and feasibility rates of the Mini-peer Assessment Tool (Mini-PAT), a 360° feedback instrument, translated into Spanish applied on a cardiology residency program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: We translated the Mini-PAT questionnaire into Spanish. The validation sample included all residents in our cardiology program (n = 19). Each resident was evaluated by 8 raters chosen by themselves, through a 4-point Likert scale. Validity was evaluated with factor analysis and reliability by analyzing internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Feasibility was defined by a minimum of 80% of the raters responding the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor analysis clearly identified five item groupings, similar to the theoretical attributes predefined in the original questionnaire, providing evidence of the validity of the Spanish version. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92, indicating high internal consistency of the items included. All the evaluators proposed completed the electronic form (152 surveys) demonstrating feasibility to implement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides evidence of reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 360° feedback tool Mini-PAT performed in a cardiology residency program to assess global performance and humanistic qualities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":"33 3","pages":"95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_119_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 360° feedback tool emerges as one of the most effective techniques for the assessment of humanistic qualities and communication skills of medical trainees, providing effective feedback. A valid Spanish version of this tool has not yet been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and feasibility rates of the Mini-peer Assessment Tool (Mini-PAT), a 360° feedback instrument, translated into Spanish applied on a cardiology residency program.

Methods: : We translated the Mini-PAT questionnaire into Spanish. The validation sample included all residents in our cardiology program (n = 19). Each resident was evaluated by 8 raters chosen by themselves, through a 4-point Likert scale. Validity was evaluated with factor analysis and reliability by analyzing internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Feasibility was defined by a minimum of 80% of the raters responding the questionnaire.

Results: The factor analysis clearly identified five item groupings, similar to the theoretical attributes predefined in the original questionnaire, providing evidence of the validity of the Spanish version. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92, indicating high internal consistency of the items included. All the evaluators proposed completed the electronic form (152 surveys) demonstrating feasibility to implement.

Discussion: This study provides evidence of reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 360° feedback tool Mini-PAT performed in a cardiology residency program to assess global performance and humanistic qualities.

西班牙语版360°居民绩效反馈工具的验证:一项试点研究。
背景:360°反馈工具是评估医学实习生人文素质和沟通技巧最有效的技术之一,可以提供有效的反馈。此工具的有效西班牙语版本尚未出版。本研究的目的是评估迷你同行评估工具(Mini-PAT)的有效性,可靠性和可行性,Mini-PAT是一种360°反馈仪器,翻译成西班牙语应用于心脏病学住院医师计划。方法:将Mini-PAT问卷翻译成西班牙语。验证样本包括我们心脏病学项目的所有住院医师(n = 19)。每位居民由他们自己选择的8名评分员通过4分李克特量表进行评估。效度采用因子分析评估,信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数分析内部一致性。可行性的定义是至少80%的评分者回答问卷。结果:因子分析明确了五个项目分组,与原问卷中预定义的理论属性相似,为西班牙语版的有效性提供了证据。Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.92,表明被测项目具有较高的内部一致性。所有建议的评估者都完成了电子表格(152项调查),证明了实施的可行性。讨论:本研究提供了西班牙语版360°反馈工具Mini-PAT的可靠性和有效性的证据,该工具用于评估心脏病学住院医师项目的整体表现和人文素质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信