Preprocedural Ultrasonography Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients with Difficult Anatomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

The Eurasian Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-23 DOI:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2020.20215
Yasin Uyel, Alper Kilicaslan
{"title":"Preprocedural Ultrasonography Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients with Difficult Anatomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.","authors":"Yasin Uyel,&nbsp;Alper Kilicaslan","doi":"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2020.20215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was aimed to determine whether preprocedural ultrasonography (USG) affects the technical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficulty in palpating landmarks, scoliosis, or previous spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted in 156 elderly patients scheduled for elective orthopedic lower extremity surgery. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive spinal anesthesia by the preprocedural USG examination (group U) or conventional landmark palpation technique (group P). The primary finding of our study was the rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space on initial needle insertion attempt. Secondary achievements included number of needle insertion attempts, number of needle redirections, total procedure time, needle pain scores, patient satisfaction, and complications of spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space at the first needle insertion attempt was significantly higher in group U than in group P (74.4% vs 53.8%, p=0.008). Medians (interquartile range) of both needle insertion attempts (group P, 2 [1-3] vs group U, 1 [1-2]; p=0.038) and needle redirections (group P, 3 [2-5] vs group U, 2 [1-4]; p=0.028), requiring to achieve dural puncture, were significantly higher among the patients in group P than those in group U. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding total procedure time, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and spinal anesthesia-induced complications (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings showed that preprocedural neuroaxial USG improves technical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficult anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":517142,"journal":{"name":"The Eurasian Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929581/pdf/eajm-53-1-9.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Eurasian Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2020.20215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to determine whether preprocedural ultrasonography (USG) affects the technical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficulty in palpating landmarks, scoliosis, or previous spine surgery.

Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted in 156 elderly patients scheduled for elective orthopedic lower extremity surgery. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive spinal anesthesia by the preprocedural USG examination (group U) or conventional landmark palpation technique (group P). The primary finding of our study was the rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space on initial needle insertion attempt. Secondary achievements included number of needle insertion attempts, number of needle redirections, total procedure time, needle pain scores, patient satisfaction, and complications of spinal anesthesia.

Results: The rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space at the first needle insertion attempt was significantly higher in group U than in group P (74.4% vs 53.8%, p=0.008). Medians (interquartile range) of both needle insertion attempts (group P, 2 [1-3] vs group U, 1 [1-2]; p=0.038) and needle redirections (group P, 3 [2-5] vs group U, 2 [1-4]; p=0.028), requiring to achieve dural puncture, were significantly higher among the patients in group P than those in group U. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding total procedure time, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and spinal anesthesia-induced complications (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Our study findings showed that preprocedural neuroaxial USG improves technical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficult anatomy.

术前超声检查与标志引导脊柱麻醉在老年解剖困难患者中的应用:一项前瞻性随机试验。
目的:本研究旨在确定术前超声检查(USG)是否会影响触诊标志困难、脊柱侧凸或既往脊柱手术的老年患者的脊髓麻醉技术性能。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究纳入156例拟择期骨科下肢手术的老年患者。将患者随机分为两组,分别采用术前USG检查(U组)和常规标记触诊技术(P组)进行脊髓麻醉。我们研究的主要发现是首次尝试插入针时成功进入蛛网膜下腔的率。次要成就包括针插入次数、针重定向次数、总手术时间、针痛评分、患者满意度和脊髓麻醉并发症。结果:U组首次入针进入蛛网膜下腔的成功率明显高于P组(74.4% vs 53.8%, P =0.008)。两次插针尝试的中位数(四分位数范围)(P组,2 [1-3]vs U组,1 [1-2];p=0.038)和针头重定向(p组,3 [2-5]vs U组,2 [1-4];p=0.028),需要进行硬脊膜穿刺的患者p组明显高于u组。两组间在总手术时间、疼痛评分、患者满意度评分、脊髓麻醉所致并发症方面差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,术前神经轴向USG可改善老年解剖困难患者的脊髓麻醉技术性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信