Evaluation of an Intervention Program for Promoting Breast Self-Examination Behavior in Employed Women in Iran.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Pub Date : 2021-02-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178223421989657
Saeed Bashirian, Majid Barati, Younes Mohammadi, Leila MoaddabShoar, Mitra Dogonchi
{"title":"Evaluation of an Intervention Program for Promoting Breast Self-Examination Behavior in Employed Women in Iran.","authors":"Saeed Bashirian,&nbsp;Majid Barati,&nbsp;Younes Mohammadi,&nbsp;Leila MoaddabShoar,&nbsp;Mitra Dogonchi","doi":"10.1177/1178223421989657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in the world. Screening is the basis for early detection. However, the mortality rate is still high in Iranian women related to not screening and timely check-ups. We offered a theory-based intervention program to improve breast cancer screening behavior in women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interventional study was conducted in 135 employed women in 2019. Their screening behavior was investigated using a questionnaire based on the Protection Motivation and Social Support Theories. We compared the efficacy of 2 educational interventions (a workshop and an E-learning program) between 2 intervention groups and a control group. The results were collected 3 months after the interventions had taken place. Data were analyzed in SPSS 23 using descriptive statistics, chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the paired sample <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant difference between the mean score of knowledge and the theoretical constructs (<i>P</i> value < .001) before and after the interventions. Our results also showed that both the intervention methods had a similar effect and that there was a significant difference in the performance of breast self-examinations between the intervention and control groups after the intervention (<i>P</i> value < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of implementing an E-learning program, we would recommend that health care planners assist in designing and implementing this effective form of intervention to encourage many more women to perform self-examinations to aid breast cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9163,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"1178223421989657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178223421989657","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178223421989657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in the world. Screening is the basis for early detection. However, the mortality rate is still high in Iranian women related to not screening and timely check-ups. We offered a theory-based intervention program to improve breast cancer screening behavior in women.

Methods: This interventional study was conducted in 135 employed women in 2019. Their screening behavior was investigated using a questionnaire based on the Protection Motivation and Social Support Theories. We compared the efficacy of 2 educational interventions (a workshop and an E-learning program) between 2 intervention groups and a control group. The results were collected 3 months after the interventions had taken place. Data were analyzed in SPSS 23 using descriptive statistics, chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the paired sample t-test.

Results: We found a significant difference between the mean score of knowledge and the theoretical constructs (P value < .001) before and after the interventions. Our results also showed that both the intervention methods had a similar effect and that there was a significant difference in the performance of breast self-examinations between the intervention and control groups after the intervention (P value < .001).

Conclusion: Given the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of implementing an E-learning program, we would recommend that health care planners assist in designing and implementing this effective form of intervention to encourage many more women to perform self-examinations to aid breast cancer screening.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

促进伊朗就业妇女乳房自我检查行为的干预方案评估。
乳腺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤。筛查是早期发现的基础。然而,由于没有进行筛查和及时检查,伊朗妇女的死亡率仍然很高。我们提供了一个基于理论的干预项目来改善女性的乳腺癌筛查行为。方法:2019年对135名在职女性进行介入研究。采用基于保护动机和社会支持理论的问卷调查方法,对其筛查行为进行调查。我们比较了两个干预组和对照组之间的两种教育干预(研讨会和电子学习计划)的效果。结果是在干预发生3个月后收集的。数据在SPSS 23中使用描述性统计、卡方、方差分析(ANOVA)和配对样本t检验进行分析。结论:考虑到实施电子学习计划的成本效益和可行性,我们建议卫生保健计划人员协助设计和实施这种有效的干预形式,以鼓励更多的妇女进行自我检查,以帮助进行乳腺癌筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, journal which considers manuscripts on all areas of breast cancer research and treatment. We welcome original research, short notes, case studies and review articles related to breast cancer-related research. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, breast cancer sub types, pathobiology, metastasis, genetics and epigenetics, mammary gland biology, breast cancer models, prevention, detection, therapy and clinical interventions, and epidemiology and population genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信