Citizens, Research Ethics Committee Members and Researchers' Attitude Toward Information and Consent for the Secondary Use of Health Data: Implications for Research Within Learning Health Systems.

IF 1.1
Annabelle Cumyn, Roxanne Dault, Adrien Barton, Anne-Marie Cloutier, Jean-François Ethier
{"title":"Citizens, Research Ethics Committee Members and Researchers' Attitude Toward Information and Consent for the Secondary Use of Health Data: Implications for Research Within Learning Health Systems.","authors":"Annabelle Cumyn,&nbsp;Roxanne Dault,&nbsp;Adrien Barton,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Cloutier,&nbsp;Jean-François Ethier","doi":"10.1177/1556264621992214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A survey was conducted to assess citizens, research ethics committee members, and researchers' attitude toward information and consent for the secondary use of health data for research within learning health systems (LHSs). Results show that the reuse of health data for research to advance knowledge and improve care is valued by all parties; consent regarding health data reuse for research has fundamental importance particularly to citizens; and all respondents deemed important the existence of a secure website to support the information and consent processes. This survey was part of a larger project that aims at exploring public perspectives on alternate approaches to the current consent models for health data reuse to take into consideration the unique features of LHSs. The revised model will need to ensure that citizens are given the opportunity to be better informed about upcoming research and have their say, when possible, in the use of their data.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"165-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1556264621992214","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264621992214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A survey was conducted to assess citizens, research ethics committee members, and researchers' attitude toward information and consent for the secondary use of health data for research within learning health systems (LHSs). Results show that the reuse of health data for research to advance knowledge and improve care is valued by all parties; consent regarding health data reuse for research has fundamental importance particularly to citizens; and all respondents deemed important the existence of a secure website to support the information and consent processes. This survey was part of a larger project that aims at exploring public perspectives on alternate approaches to the current consent models for health data reuse to take into consideration the unique features of LHSs. The revised model will need to ensure that citizens are given the opportunity to be better informed about upcoming research and have their say, when possible, in the use of their data.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

公民、研究伦理委员会成员和研究人员对健康数据二次使用的信息和同意的态度:对学习型卫生系统研究的影响。
进行了一项调查,以评估公民、研究伦理委员会成员和研究人员对学习型卫生系统(lhs)内二次使用卫生数据进行研究的信息和同意的态度。结果表明,各方都重视将卫生数据用于研究以促进知识和改善护理;同意为研究重用健康数据具有根本重要性,特别是对公民;所有的受访者都认为有一个安全的网站来支持信息和同意过程是很重要的。这项调查是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在探索公众对当前卫生数据重用同意模型的替代方法的看法,以考虑到卫生保健服务的独特特点。修订后的模型将需要确保公民有机会更好地了解即将进行的研究,并在可能的情况下对其数据的使用拥有发言权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书