Rahul Garg, Usha Sambamoorthi, Xi Tan, Soumit K Basu, Treah Haggerty, Kimberly M Kelly
{"title":"Impact of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma on Mammography and Bone Density Testing in Women.","authors":"Rahul Garg, Usha Sambamoorthi, Xi Tan, Soumit K Basu, Treah Haggerty, Kimberly M Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s10935-021-00621-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are at an increased risk of mortality from breast cancer and osteoporosis. However, the impact of DLBCL on rates of mammography and bone density testing (BDT) is unknown. We compared female DLBCL and non-cancer patients utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset to analyze the predictors of mammography and BDT. Guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM), we used multivariable logistic regressions with inverse probability treatment weighting to examine the association of intrapersonal, interpersonal, healthcare system, and community factors with mammography and BDT. The rates of mammography (59.8%) and BDT (18.5%) in women with DLBCL were similar to those without cancer (60.2% and 19.6%, respectively). After adjusting for the SEM factors, DLBCL patients were less likely to get mammography and BDT than non-cancer patients. The treatments of radiotherapy and stem cell transplant were not associated with either mammography or BDT. DLBCL diagnosis was associated with lower rates of mammography and BDT rates among women with DLBCL, as compared to non-cancer patients. To reduce the morbidity and mortality from breast cancer and fractures in women with DLBCL, providers should increase their recommendations for mammography in those receiving radiotherapy and BDT in stem cell transplant patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":"42 2","pages":"143-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10935-021-00621-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00621-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Women with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are at an increased risk of mortality from breast cancer and osteoporosis. However, the impact of DLBCL on rates of mammography and bone density testing (BDT) is unknown. We compared female DLBCL and non-cancer patients utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset to analyze the predictors of mammography and BDT. Guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM), we used multivariable logistic regressions with inverse probability treatment weighting to examine the association of intrapersonal, interpersonal, healthcare system, and community factors with mammography and BDT. The rates of mammography (59.8%) and BDT (18.5%) in women with DLBCL were similar to those without cancer (60.2% and 19.6%, respectively). After adjusting for the SEM factors, DLBCL patients were less likely to get mammography and BDT than non-cancer patients. The treatments of radiotherapy and stem cell transplant were not associated with either mammography or BDT. DLBCL diagnosis was associated with lower rates of mammography and BDT rates among women with DLBCL, as compared to non-cancer patients. To reduce the morbidity and mortality from breast cancer and fractures in women with DLBCL, providers should increase their recommendations for mammography in those receiving radiotherapy and BDT in stem cell transplant patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prevention is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes manuscripts aimed at reducing negative social and health outcomes and promoting human health and well-being. It publishes high-quality research that discusses evidence-based interventions, policies, and practices. The editions cover a wide range of prevention science themes and value diverse populations, age groups, and methodologies. Our target audiences are prevention scientists, practitioners, and policymakers from diverse geographic locations. Specific types of papers published in the journal include Original Research, Research Methods, Practitioner Narrative, Debate, Brief Reports, Letter to the Editor, Policy, and Reviews. The selection of articles for publication is based on their innovation, contribution to the field of prevention, and quality. The Journal of Prevention differs from other similar journals in the field by offering a more culturally and geographically diverse team of editors, a broader range of subjects and methodologies, and the intention to attract the readership of prevention practitioners and other stakeholders (alongside scientists).