The Available Criteria for Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department-A Retrospective Assessment.

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-03-02 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S280279
Sanjhai Ramdeen, Brandon Ferrell, Christopher Bonk, Laura Schubel, Robin Littlejohn, Muge Capan, Ryan Arnold, Kristen Miller
{"title":"The Available Criteria for Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department-A Retrospective Assessment.","authors":"Sanjhai Ramdeen,&nbsp;Brandon Ferrell,&nbsp;Christopher Bonk,&nbsp;Laura Schubel,&nbsp;Robin Littlejohn,&nbsp;Muge Capan,&nbsp;Ryan Arnold,&nbsp;Kristen Miller","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S280279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of the study was to assess the criteria availability of eight sepsis scoring methods within 6 hours of triage in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective data analysis study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ED of MedStar Washington Hospital Center (MWHC), a 912-bed urban, tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients presenting to the MWHC ED between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018 and admitted with a diagnosis of severe sepsis with or without shock.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measured: </strong>Availability of sepsis scoring criteria of eight different sepsis scoring methods at three time points-0 Hours (T0), 3 Hours (T1) and 6 Hours (T2) after arrival to the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 charts were reviewed, which included 23 (46%) males and 27 (54%) females. Forty-eight patients (96%) were Black or African American. Glasgow Coma Scale was available for all 50 patients at T0. Vital signs, except for temperature, were readily available (>90%) at T0. The majority of laboratory values relevant for sepsis scoring criteria were available (>90%) at T1, with exception to bilirubin (66%) and creatinine (80%). NEWS, PRESEP and qSOFA had greater than 90% criteria availability at triage. SOFA and SIRS consistently had the least percent of available criteria at all time points in the ED.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The availability of patient data at different time points in a patient's ED visit suggests that different scoring methods could be utilized to assess for sepsis as more patient information becomes available.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/83/oaem-13-91.PMC7936926.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S280279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The goal of the study was to assess the criteria availability of eight sepsis scoring methods within 6 hours of triage in the emergency department (ED).

Design: Retrospective data analysis study.

Setting: ED of MedStar Washington Hospital Center (MWHC), a 912-bed urban, tertiary hospital.

Patients: Adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients presenting to the MWHC ED between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018 and admitted with a diagnosis of severe sepsis with or without shock.

Main outcomes measured: Availability of sepsis scoring criteria of eight different sepsis scoring methods at three time points-0 Hours (T0), 3 Hours (T1) and 6 Hours (T2) after arrival to the ED.

Results: A total of 50 charts were reviewed, which included 23 (46%) males and 27 (54%) females. Forty-eight patients (96%) were Black or African American. Glasgow Coma Scale was available for all 50 patients at T0. Vital signs, except for temperature, were readily available (>90%) at T0. The majority of laboratory values relevant for sepsis scoring criteria were available (>90%) at T1, with exception to bilirubin (66%) and creatinine (80%). NEWS, PRESEP and qSOFA had greater than 90% criteria availability at triage. SOFA and SIRS consistently had the least percent of available criteria at all time points in the ED.

Conclusion: The availability of patient data at different time points in a patient's ED visit suggests that different scoring methods could be utilized to assess for sepsis as more patient information becomes available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急诊不同脓毒症评分系统的可用标准——回顾性评估
目的:本研究的目的是评估8种脓毒症评分方法在急诊科(ED)分诊后6小时内的标准可用性。设计:回顾性数据分析研究。地点:MedStar华盛顿医院中心(MWHC)急诊科,一所拥有912个床位的城市三级医院。患者:2017年6月1日至2018年5月31日期间就诊于MWHC ED的成人(年龄≥18岁)患者,诊断为严重脓毒症伴或不伴休克。主要观察结果:8种不同脓毒症评分方法在到达ed后0小时(T0)、3小时(T1)和6小时(T2)三个时间点脓毒症评分标准的可用性。结果:共审查50张图表,其中男性23例(46%),女性27例(54%)。48例患者(96%)为黑人或非裔美国人。所有50例患者在T0时均可使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表。T0时除体温外,其他生命体征均可获得(>90%)。T1时,除胆红素(66%)和肌酐(80%)外,大多数与脓毒症评分标准相关的实验室值(>90%)均可获得。NEWS、PRESEP和qSOFA在分诊时的标准可用性大于90%。在ED的所有时间点,SOFA和SIRS的可用标准始终是最低的。结论:患者在ED就诊的不同时间点的患者数据的可用性表明,随着更多患者信息的可用性,可以使用不同的评分方法来评估败血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信