Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction.

IF 12.3 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Changcai Huang, Guangyu Li, Jiayu Wu, Junbo Liang, Xiaoyue Wang
{"title":"Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction.","authors":"Changcai Huang, Guangyu Li, Jiayu Wu, Junbo Liang, Xiaoyue Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02305-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Millions of nucleotide variants are identified through cancer genome sequencing and it is clinically important to identify the pathogenic variants among them. By introducing base substitutions at guide RNA target regions in the genome, CRISPR-Cas9-based base editors provide the possibility for evaluating a large number of variants in their genomic context. However, the variability in editing efficiency and the complexity of outcome mapping are two existing problems for assigning guide RNA effects to variants in base editing screens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To improve the identification of pathogenic variants, we develop a framework to combine base editing screens with sgRNA efficiency and outcome mapping. We apply the method to evaluate more than 9000 variants across all the exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our efficiency-corrected scoring model identifies 910 loss-of-function variants for BRCA1/2, including 151 variants in the noncoding part of the genes such as the 5' untranslated regions. Many of them are identified in cancer patients and are reported as \"benign/likely benign\" or \"variants of uncertain significance\" by clinicians. Our data suggest a need to re-evaluate their clinical significance, which may be helpful for risk assessment and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that base editing screens with efficiency correction is a powerful strategy to identify pathogenic variants in a high-throughput manner. Applying this strategy to assess variants in both coding and noncoding regions of the genome could have a direct impact on the interpretation of cancer variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":48922,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7945310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02305-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Millions of nucleotide variants are identified through cancer genome sequencing and it is clinically important to identify the pathogenic variants among them. By introducing base substitutions at guide RNA target regions in the genome, CRISPR-Cas9-based base editors provide the possibility for evaluating a large number of variants in their genomic context. However, the variability in editing efficiency and the complexity of outcome mapping are two existing problems for assigning guide RNA effects to variants in base editing screens.

Results: To improve the identification of pathogenic variants, we develop a framework to combine base editing screens with sgRNA efficiency and outcome mapping. We apply the method to evaluate more than 9000 variants across all the exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our efficiency-corrected scoring model identifies 910 loss-of-function variants for BRCA1/2, including 151 variants in the noncoding part of the genes such as the 5' untranslated regions. Many of them are identified in cancer patients and are reported as "benign/likely benign" or "variants of uncertain significance" by clinicians. Our data suggest a need to re-evaluate their clinical significance, which may be helpful for risk assessment and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that base editing screens with efficiency correction is a powerful strategy to identify pathogenic variants in a high-throughput manner. Applying this strategy to assess variants in both coding and noncoding regions of the genome could have a direct impact on the interpretation of cancer variants.

利用具有编辑效率校正功能的碱基编辑筛选确定癌症基因中的致病变异。
背景:通过癌症基因组测序确定了数百万个核苷酸变异,而确定其中的致病变异具有重要的临床意义。基于 CRISPR-Cas9 的碱基编辑器通过在基因组中的引导 RNA 靶区引入碱基替换,为评估基因组上下文中的大量变异提供了可能。然而,编辑效率的可变性和结果图谱的复杂性是目前在碱基编辑筛选中将向导 RNA 的效应分配给变异体的两个问题:为了更好地识别致病变异,我们开发了一个框架,将碱基编辑筛选与 sgRNA 效率和结果图谱相结合。我们应用该方法评估了 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因所有外显子中的 9000 多个变异。我们的效率校正评分模型确定了 BRCA1/2 的 910 个功能缺失变异,包括基因非编码部分(如 5' 非翻译区)的 151 个变异。其中许多变异是在癌症患者中发现的,临床医生将其报告为 "良性/可能良性 "或 "意义不确定的变异"。我们的数据表明,有必要重新评估它们的临床意义,这可能有助于乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险评估和治疗:我们的研究结果表明,带有效率校正的碱基编辑筛选是一种以高通量方式鉴定致病变异的强大策略。应用这种策略评估基因组编码区和非编码区的变异可能会对癌症变异的解释产生直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Biology is a leading research journal that focuses on the study of biology and biomedicine from a genomic and post-genomic standpoint. The journal consistently publishes outstanding research across various areas within these fields. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022), Genome Biology has earned its place as the 3rd highest-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category, according to Thomson Reuters. Additionally, it is ranked 2nd among research journals in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category. It is important to note that Genome Biology is the top-ranking open access journal in this category. In summary, Genome Biology sets a high standard for scientific publications in the field, showcasing cutting-edge research and earning recognition among its peers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信