Anterolateral Bone Window for Revision Broken Cemented Stem of Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2021-02-23 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6620395
Mohamed Mosa Mohamed Mahmoud, Bahaaeldin Ibrahim, Amr Abdelhalem Amr, Maysara Abdelhalem Bayoumy
{"title":"Anterolateral Bone Window for Revision Broken Cemented Stem of Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.","authors":"Mohamed Mosa Mohamed Mahmoud,&nbsp;Bahaaeldin Ibrahim,&nbsp;Amr Abdelhalem Amr,&nbsp;Maysara Abdelhalem Bayoumy","doi":"10.1155/2021/6620395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractured stem of the hip prosthesis is well documented in the literature. Although it is rare, it is considered as a challenging problem. Many techniques have been described to solve this problem. <i>Purpose of the Study</i>. Evaluation of the effect of anterolateral bone window for extraction of the cemented femoral stem of hemiarthroplasty in revision total hip replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included eight revision hip arthroplasties in eight patients, with a broken stem of cemented (Thompson) hemiarthroplasty, which has been revised by the anterolateral proximal femoral window. All cases received cemented cups and cement-in-cement stems, except one case who received cementless long stem. Clinical follow-up of cases by Harries hip score (HHS) and X-ray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional improvement of HHS of all cases, with no signs of loosening, after a mean follow-up period of 1.5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extraction of broken stem is a challenging procedure. Many techniques have been described for revision of cases with a fractured stem of hip prosthesis, but we think that the anterolateral femoral bone window is a reproducible technique due to the characteristics of simplicity, short-time procedure, less invasive, not requiring extra instruments, and can be successful for most patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6620395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925039/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6620395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Fractured stem of the hip prosthesis is well documented in the literature. Although it is rare, it is considered as a challenging problem. Many techniques have been described to solve this problem. Purpose of the Study. Evaluation of the effect of anterolateral bone window for extraction of the cemented femoral stem of hemiarthroplasty in revision total hip replacement.

Methods: The study included eight revision hip arthroplasties in eight patients, with a broken stem of cemented (Thompson) hemiarthroplasty, which has been revised by the anterolateral proximal femoral window. All cases received cemented cups and cement-in-cement stems, except one case who received cementless long stem. Clinical follow-up of cases by Harries hip score (HHS) and X-ray.

Results: Functional improvement of HHS of all cases, with no signs of loosening, after a mean follow-up period of 1.5 years.

Conclusion: Extraction of broken stem is a challenging procedure. Many techniques have been described for revision of cases with a fractured stem of hip prosthesis, but we think that the anterolateral femoral bone window is a reproducible technique due to the characteristics of simplicity, short-time procedure, less invasive, not requiring extra instruments, and can be successful for most patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前外侧骨窗修复单极半关节置换术中骨折骨水泥假体。
背景:髋关节假体茎部骨折在文献中有很好的记载。虽然它很罕见,但它被认为是一个具有挑战性的问题。已经描述了许多技术来解决这个问题。研究目的:前外侧骨窗在改良全髋关节置换术中骨水泥股骨干取出的效果评价。方法:该研究包括8例患者的8例翻修髋关节置换术,其中8例患者为骨折的骨水泥(Thompson)半关节置换术,经股骨前外侧近端窗翻修。除1例接受无水泥长茎外,所有病例均接受骨水泥杯和骨水泥中茎。通过harris髋关节评分(HHS)和x线片对病例进行临床随访。结果:平均随访1.5年,所有病例HHS功能改善,无松动迹象。结论:断茎的拔出是一项具有挑战性的手术。许多技术已经被描述用于翻修髋关节假体骨折的病例,但我们认为股骨前外侧骨窗是一种可重复的技术,因为它简单,操作时间短,侵入性小,不需要额外的器械,对大多数患者来说都是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信