Ultrasound-Guided Postpyloric Feeding Tube Placement in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Ichiro Osawa, Norihiko Tsuboi, Hisataka Nozawa, Nao Nishimura, Satoshi Nakagawa
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Postpyloric Feeding Tube Placement in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Ichiro Osawa,&nbsp;Norihiko Tsuboi,&nbsp;Hisataka Nozawa,&nbsp;Nao Nishimura,&nbsp;Satoshi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Various methods to insert postpyloric feeding tubes at the bedside have been reported, but the optimal method remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill children.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICU of tertiary children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children under the age of 16 who underwent postpyloric feeding tube placement in our PICU between September 2017 and August 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 115 patients were included in this study: 30 patients underwent ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement and 85 patients underwent blind postpyloric feeding tube placement; the insertion attempts were 32 and 93, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the ultrasound-guided group and the blind group. The first-pass success rate of the ultrasound-guided group was higher than that of the blind group (94% [30/32] vs 57% [53/93]; p < 0.001). The median insertion time in the ultrasound-guided group with successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion was 18 minutes (interquartile range, 15-25; range, 8-45; n = 21). There were no complications or adverse events during the placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center study, ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement was feasible and a significantly high first-pass success rate was observed for critically ill children. Additional investigation with a larger pool of operators and randomized controlled patient assignment is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"e324-e328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: Various methods to insert postpyloric feeding tubes at the bedside have been reported, but the optimal method remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill children.

Design: Single-center retrospective observational study.

Setting: PICU of tertiary children's hospital.

Patients: Children under the age of 16 who underwent postpyloric feeding tube placement in our PICU between September 2017 and August 2019.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: A total of 115 patients were included in this study: 30 patients underwent ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement and 85 patients underwent blind postpyloric feeding tube placement; the insertion attempts were 32 and 93, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the ultrasound-guided group and the blind group. The first-pass success rate of the ultrasound-guided group was higher than that of the blind group (94% [30/32] vs 57% [53/93]; p < 0.001). The median insertion time in the ultrasound-guided group with successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion was 18 minutes (interquartile range, 15-25; range, 8-45; n = 21). There were no complications or adverse events during the placement.

Conclusions: In this single-center study, ultrasound-guided postpyloric feeding tube placement was feasible and a significantly high first-pass success rate was observed for critically ill children. Additional investigation with a larger pool of operators and randomized controlled patient assignment is required.

超声引导下小儿危重症患者幽门后饲管置入。
目的:在床边插入幽门后饲管的各种方法已被报道,但最佳方法仍有争议。本研究的目的是评估超声引导下幽门后饲管放置在危重患儿中的效果。设计:单中心回顾性观察研究。工作地点:三级儿童医院PICU。患者:2017年9月至2019年8月期间在PICU放置幽门后饲管的16岁以下儿童。干预措施:没有。测量结果及主要结果:本研究共纳入115例患者:超声引导下放置幽门后饲管30例,盲置幽门后饲管85例;插入尝试次数分别为32次和93次。超声引导组和盲导组在患者人口统计学上无显著差异。超声引导组一次通过率高于盲组(94% [30/32]vs 57% [53/93];P < 0.001)。超声引导组幽门后置饲管成功的中位置管时间为18分钟(四分位数范围15 ~ 25;8-45范围;N = 21)。放置期间无并发症或不良事件发生。结论:在本单中心研究中,超声引导下幽门后置饲管是可行的,对危重患儿的一次通过成功率明显较高。需要在更大的手术池和随机对照患者分配中进行额外的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信