Use of concurrent multiple methods of contraception in the United States, 2008 to 2015

Q2 Medicine
Megan L. Kavanaugh , Emma Pliskin , Jenna Jerman
{"title":"Use of concurrent multiple methods of contraception in the United States, 2008 to 2015","authors":"Megan L. Kavanaugh ,&nbsp;Emma Pliskin ,&nbsp;Jenna Jerman","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2021.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify prevalence of, characteristics associated with, and combinations of, use of more than one method of contraception at last intercourse among US women between 2008 and 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses using data on concurrent contraceptive use from 2 nationally representative samples of women ages 15 to 44 who had used some form of contraception at last intercourse in the past 3 months in the 2006–2010 (<em>n</em> = 6601) and 2013–2017 (<em>n</em> = 5562) cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Use of more than one method of contraception at last sex increased from 14% in 2008 to 18% in 2015 (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001), with increases in use documented across many population groups. Among multiple method users, the majority combined condoms with other methods (58%), while the rest combined other methods (42%). When compared to single method users, dual method users employing condoms are a more homogeneous group of individuals than are dual method users not employing condoms. As age increases, dual use with condoms decreases, but there is no similar linear relationship between age and dual method use without condoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A sizable proportion of US women use more than one contraceptive method during sex; current estimates of contraceptive use focused exclusively on single method use may underestimate the extent to which women are protected from unintended pregnancy. The needs and goals of individuals combining contraceptive methods in different ways may change over the life course as pregnancy desires and life circumstances change.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>A sizable proportion of US women use more than one contraceptive method during sex; clinicians and health educators in nonclinical settings should assess and acknowledge these more complicated contraceptive strategies in order to help individuals achieve autonomy in method choice and meet their goals around pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2021.100060","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objective

To identify prevalence of, characteristics associated with, and combinations of, use of more than one method of contraception at last intercourse among US women between 2008 and 2015.

Methods

We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses using data on concurrent contraceptive use from 2 nationally representative samples of women ages 15 to 44 who had used some form of contraception at last intercourse in the past 3 months in the 2006–2010 (n = 6601) and 2013–2017 (n = 5562) cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth.

Results

Use of more than one method of contraception at last sex increased from 14% in 2008 to 18% in 2015 (p<0.001), with increases in use documented across many population groups. Among multiple method users, the majority combined condoms with other methods (58%), while the rest combined other methods (42%). When compared to single method users, dual method users employing condoms are a more homogeneous group of individuals than are dual method users not employing condoms. As age increases, dual use with condoms decreases, but there is no similar linear relationship between age and dual method use without condoms.

Conclusions

A sizable proportion of US women use more than one contraceptive method during sex; current estimates of contraceptive use focused exclusively on single method use may underestimate the extent to which women are protected from unintended pregnancy. The needs and goals of individuals combining contraceptive methods in different ways may change over the life course as pregnancy desires and life circumstances change.

Implications

A sizable proportion of US women use more than one contraceptive method during sex; clinicians and health educators in nonclinical settings should assess and acknowledge these more complicated contraceptive strategies in order to help individuals achieve autonomy in method choice and meet their goals around pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention.

Abstract Image

2008 - 2015年美国同时使用多种避孕方法的情况
目的了解2008年至2015年间美国女性在最后性交中使用一种以上避孕方法的流行程度、特点及组合。方法对2006-2010年( = 6601)和2013-2017年( = 5562)两个全国代表性的15 ~ 44岁女性样本进行双变量和多变量logistic回归分析,这些女性在过去3个月内最后一次性行为中使用了某种形式的避孕措施。结果末次性行为中使用一种以上避孕方法的比例从2008年的14%上升到2015年的18% (p < 0.001),许多人群的使用情况都有所增加。在多种方法使用者中,大多数人将避孕套与其他方法结合使用(58%),其余的人将其他方法结合使用(42%)。与单一方法使用者相比,使用避孕套的双重方法使用者比不使用避孕套的双重方法使用者更具有同质性。随着年龄的增长,使用避孕套的双重使用减少,但年龄与不使用避孕套的双重使用之间没有类似的线性关系。结论相当比例的美国妇女在性行为中使用一种以上的避孕方法;目前对避孕药具使用情况的估计只侧重于单一方法的使用,这可能低估了妇女免受意外怀孕的保护程度。个人以不同方式结合避孕方法的需要和目标可能随着怀孕愿望和生活环境的变化而改变。相当大比例的美国妇女在性行为中使用一种以上的避孕方法;临床医生和非临床环境中的健康教育工作者应该评估和承认这些更复杂的避孕策略,以帮助个人实现方法选择的自主权,并实现他们在怀孕和性传播感染预防方面的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信