Hemodynamic support in septic shock.

IF 2.1
Marina García-de-Acilu, Jaume Mesquida, Guillem Gruartmoner, Ricard Ferrer
{"title":"Hemodynamic support in septic shock.","authors":"Marina García-de-Acilu,&nbsp;Jaume Mesquida,&nbsp;Guillem Gruartmoner,&nbsp;Ricard Ferrer","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000000959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The current article reviews recent findings on the monitoring and hemodynamic support of septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The ultimate goal of hemodynamic resuscitation is to restore tissue oxygenation. A multimodal approach combining global and regional markers of tissue hypoxia seems appropriate to guide resuscitation. Several multicenter clinical trials have provided evidence against an aggressive fluid resuscitation strategy. Fluid administration should be personalized and based on the evidence of fluid responsiveness. Dynamic indices have proven to be highly predictive of responsiveness. Recent data suggest that balanced crystalloids may be associated with less renal failure. When fluid therapy is insufficient, a multimode approach with different types of vasopressors has been suggested as an initial approach. Dobutamine remains the firs inotropic option in patients with persistent hypotension and decrease ventricular systolic function. Calcium sensitizer and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may be considered, but evidence is still limited. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be considered in selected unresponsive patients, particularly with myocardial depression, and in a highly experienced center.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Resuscitation should be personalized and based on global and regional markers of tissue hypoxia as well as the fluid responsiveness indices. The beneficial effect of multimode approach with different types of vasopressors, remains to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose of review: The current article reviews recent findings on the monitoring and hemodynamic support of septic shock patients.

Recent findings: The ultimate goal of hemodynamic resuscitation is to restore tissue oxygenation. A multimodal approach combining global and regional markers of tissue hypoxia seems appropriate to guide resuscitation. Several multicenter clinical trials have provided evidence against an aggressive fluid resuscitation strategy. Fluid administration should be personalized and based on the evidence of fluid responsiveness. Dynamic indices have proven to be highly predictive of responsiveness. Recent data suggest that balanced crystalloids may be associated with less renal failure. When fluid therapy is insufficient, a multimode approach with different types of vasopressors has been suggested as an initial approach. Dobutamine remains the firs inotropic option in patients with persistent hypotension and decrease ventricular systolic function. Calcium sensitizer and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may be considered, but evidence is still limited. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be considered in selected unresponsive patients, particularly with myocardial depression, and in a highly experienced center.

Summary: Resuscitation should be personalized and based on global and regional markers of tissue hypoxia as well as the fluid responsiveness indices. The beneficial effect of multimode approach with different types of vasopressors, remains to be determined.

脓毒性休克的血流动力学支持。
综述目的:本文综述了脓毒性休克患者的监测和血流动力学支持方面的最新发现。最新发现:血流动力学复苏的最终目的是恢复组织氧合。结合整体和局部组织缺氧标志物的多模式方法似乎适合指导复苏。一些多中心临床试验已经提供了反对积极液体复苏策略的证据。液体管理应个性化,并基于液体反应的证据。动态指数已被证明是高度预测响应性。最近的数据表明,平衡的晶体可能与较少的肾功能衰竭有关。当液体治疗不足时,建议使用不同类型的血管加压剂作为初始方法。对于持续性低血压和心室收缩功能下降的患者,多巴酚丁胺仍然是首选的肌力药物。钙增敏剂和磷酸二酯酶抑制剂可以考虑,但证据仍然有限。静脉-动脉体外膜氧合可考虑在选择无反应的患者,特别是心肌抑制,并在一个经验丰富的中心。总结:复苏应个性化,并基于组织缺氧的整体和区域标记以及液体反应性指标。不同类型血管加压药的多模式治疗的有益效果仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信