Mode of Delivery Among Women with a History of Prior Cesarean Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital.

Margo S Harrison, Tewodros Liyew, Ephrem Kirub, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab
{"title":"Mode of Delivery Among Women with a History of Prior Cesarean Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Margo S Harrison, Tewodros Liyew, Ephrem Kirub, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab","doi":"10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to observe mode of delivery among women with a history of prior cesarean birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After collecting data on a convenience sample of 1,000 women giving birth at 28 weeks gestation or greater at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, we reduced the sample to only include women with a history of prior cesarean birth. We wanted to observe mode of delivery among this cohort and determine if any characteristics were associated with elective repeat cesarean birth, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on history of prior cesarean birth was missing on 2 women (0.2%). Of the remaining women, 49 (4.9%) reported a history of prior cesarean; 44 (89.8%) reported one prior cesarean and 5 (10.2%) women had two prior cesarean births. Repeat cesarean birth occurred in 65.1% (n = 29/44) of women with one prior cesarean and in 80.0% (n = 4/5) of women with two prior surgeries. Among the total cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth, of those who experienced repeat cesarean birth (n = 33), 27.3% (n = 9) occurred pre-labor, 69.7% (n = 23) occurred intrapartum after the onset of spontaneous labor, and 3.0% (n = 1) occurred intrapartum during the course of an induced or augmented labor. Labor onset and cervical exam on admission were statistically significantly different in bivariate comparisons of women who successfully achieved vaginal birth after cesarean as compared to those who gave birth by repeat cesarean birth, and postpartum maternal antibiotics were more common after repeat cesarean birth, p < 0.05. In a multivariable model of factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth was increased 15% for each increasing centimeter of dilation on a woman's admission cervical exam (RR 1.15, p= 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost one-third of women in our observational cohort attempted trial of labor after cesarean; those that were successful were more likely to have been more cervically dilated on their admission exam. No sociodemographic or obstetrical characteristics were more likely among women who underwent pre-labor repeat cesarean birth as compared to intrapartum cesarean birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":74017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health and development","volume":"4 1","pages":"001-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to observe mode of delivery among women with a history of prior cesarean birth.

Methods: After collecting data on a convenience sample of 1,000 women giving birth at 28 weeks gestation or greater at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, we reduced the sample to only include women with a history of prior cesarean birth. We wanted to observe mode of delivery among this cohort and determine if any characteristics were associated with elective repeat cesarean birth, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean.

Results: Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on history of prior cesarean birth was missing on 2 women (0.2%). Of the remaining women, 49 (4.9%) reported a history of prior cesarean; 44 (89.8%) reported one prior cesarean and 5 (10.2%) women had two prior cesarean births. Repeat cesarean birth occurred in 65.1% (n = 29/44) of women with one prior cesarean and in 80.0% (n = 4/5) of women with two prior surgeries. Among the total cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth, of those who experienced repeat cesarean birth (n = 33), 27.3% (n = 9) occurred pre-labor, 69.7% (n = 23) occurred intrapartum after the onset of spontaneous labor, and 3.0% (n = 1) occurred intrapartum during the course of an induced or augmented labor. Labor onset and cervical exam on admission were statistically significantly different in bivariate comparisons of women who successfully achieved vaginal birth after cesarean as compared to those who gave birth by repeat cesarean birth, and postpartum maternal antibiotics were more common after repeat cesarean birth, p < 0.05. In a multivariable model of factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth was increased 15% for each increasing centimeter of dilation on a woman's admission cervical exam (RR 1.15, p= 0.004).

Conclusion: Almost one-third of women in our observational cohort attempted trial of labor after cesarean; those that were successful were more likely to have been more cervically dilated on their admission exam. No sociodemographic or obstetrical characteristics were more likely among women who underwent pre-labor repeat cesarean birth as compared to intrapartum cesarean birth.

Abstract Image

米赞特皮大学教学医院曾有剖腹产史的妇女的分娩方式。
研究目的本研究旨在观察曾有过剖宫产史的产妇的分娩方式:在收集了米赞特皮大学教学医院 1000 名妊娠 28 周或以上产妇的数据后,我们对样本进行了缩减,仅将有过剖宫产史的产妇纳入样本。我们希望观察这一群体的分娩方式,并确定与剖宫产后经阴道分娩相比,是否有任何特征与选择性再次剖宫产有关:在我们方便抽样调查的 1000 名妇女中,有 2 名妇女(0.2%)的剖宫产史数据缺失。在其余的产妇中,有 49 名(4.9%)产妇曾有过剖宫产史;44 名(89.8%)产妇曾有过一次剖宫产史,5 名(10.2%)产妇曾有过两次剖宫产史。在接受过一次剖宫产手术的产妇中,65.1%(n=29/44)的产妇会再次接受剖宫产手术,而在接受过两次剖宫产手术的产妇中,80.0%(n=4/5)的产妇会再次接受剖宫产手术。在所有有过剖宫产史的产妇中,经历过再次剖宫产的产妇(n = 33)中,27.3%(n = 9)发生在产前,69.7%(n = 23)发生在自然分娩开始后的产中,3.0%(n = 1)发生在引产或增产过程中的产中。与再次剖宫产的产妇相比,剖宫产后成功实现阴道分娩的产妇的分娩起始时间和入院时的宫颈检查结果在统计学上有显著差异,再次剖宫产的产妇产后使用抗生素的情况更常见,P < 0.05。在剖宫产后成功阴道分娩相关因素的多变量模型中,产妇入院宫颈检查时宫颈扩张每增加一厘米,成功阴道分娩的可能性就增加15%(RR 1.15,P= 0.004):结论:在我们的观察队列中,近三分之一的产妇在剖宫产后尝试试产;试产成功的产妇在入院检查时宫颈扩张的可能性更大。与产前剖宫产相比,产前再次剖宫产的产妇没有更高的社会人口学或产科特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信