Different Types of Theories by Level of Abstraction in Nursing: A Discussion Paper.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Eun-Ok Im
{"title":"Different Types of Theories by Level of Abstraction in Nursing: A Discussion Paper.","authors":"Eun-Ok Im","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Despite different labels used to refer to different types of nursing theories by different authors, agreements were made on three major types of theories by level of abstraction. The purpose of this analysis was to discuss the characteristics of the three major types of nursing theories by level of abstraction that were published in refereed journals and to propose directions for future theoretical development in nursing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrated literature review was conducted using PUBMED, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. A total of 116 articles were included in this analysis. The retrieved articles were sorted by the type of theories (by level of abstraction), and analyzed in terms of scope, theorizing process, specificity and abstraction, contextual understanding, links to research and practice, and diversity and generalizability. Finally, themes reflecting the characteristics of the three major types of nursing theories were extracted and discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 themes were found. Although most of the themes reflected what were known about these theories, there were three new findings. First, all the grand theories that were reviewed tended to have more specific foci rather than explaining general nature, mission, or goals of nursing. Second, middle-range theories were developed based on various types/levels of theories using various sources for theorizing. Third, situation-specific theories began to be used to generate propositions and tested through statistical and qualitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The efforts to try to link nursing theories to nursing practice need to be continued through further development and evaluation of the theories regardless of the types of theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"50-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and purpose: Despite different labels used to refer to different types of nursing theories by different authors, agreements were made on three major types of theories by level of abstraction. The purpose of this analysis was to discuss the characteristics of the three major types of nursing theories by level of abstraction that were published in refereed journals and to propose directions for future theoretical development in nursing.

Methods: An integrated literature review was conducted using PUBMED, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. A total of 116 articles were included in this analysis. The retrieved articles were sorted by the type of theories (by level of abstraction), and analyzed in terms of scope, theorizing process, specificity and abstraction, contextual understanding, links to research and practice, and diversity and generalizability. Finally, themes reflecting the characteristics of the three major types of nursing theories were extracted and discussed.

Results: A total of 17 themes were found. Although most of the themes reflected what were known about these theories, there were three new findings. First, all the grand theories that were reviewed tended to have more specific foci rather than explaining general nature, mission, or goals of nursing. Second, middle-range theories were developed based on various types/levels of theories using various sources for theorizing. Third, situation-specific theories began to be used to generate propositions and tested through statistical and qualitative analyses.

Implications for practice: The efforts to try to link nursing theories to nursing practice need to be continued through further development and evaluation of the theories regardless of the types of theories.

护理抽象层次的不同类型理论:讨论论文。
背景与目的:尽管不同作者对不同类型的护理理论使用了不同的标签,但根据抽象程度,对三种主要类型的理论达成了一致。本分析的目的是通过抽象层次来讨论发表在参考期刊上的三种主要类型的护理理论的特征,并为未来护理理论的发展提出方向。方法:综合PUBMED、CINAHL、PsycINFO等数据库进行文献综述。本分析共纳入116篇文章。检索到的文章按理论类型(按抽象程度)分类,并根据范围、理论化过程、特异性和抽象性、上下文理解、与研究和实践的联系、多样性和概括性进行分析。最后,对反映三大护理理论特点的主题进行了提炼和探讨。结果:共发现17个主题。虽然大多数主题都反映了这些理论的已知内容,但有三个新的发现。首先,所有被回顾的大理论都倾向于有更具体的焦点,而不是解释护理的一般性质、使命或目标。第二,中庸理论是在不同类型/层次的理论基础上发展起来的,使用了不同的理论来源。第三,情境理论开始被用来生成命题,并通过统计和定性分析进行检验。对实践的启示:无论护理理论的类型如何,都需要通过进一步发展和评估理论来继续努力,试图将护理理论与护理实践联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信