Knowledge for Nursing Practice: Beyond Evidence Alone.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Marlaine C Smith, Peggy L Chinn, Leslie H Nicoll
{"title":"Knowledge for Nursing Practice: Beyond Evidence Alone.","authors":"Marlaine C Smith,&nbsp;Peggy L Chinn,&nbsp;Leslie H Nicoll","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For the past 30 years there has been a growing emphasis on evidence as the primary or exclusive basis for nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critical examination of literature related to evidence-based practice from the 1990s to the present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review of the nursing literature from the 1990s to the present reveals that in the midst of the movement to promote evidence-based practice as the gold standard, there have been persistent expressions of concern. These concerns are (a) lack of alignment of evidence-based practice with nursing's disciplinary perspective; (b) wrongful privileging of empirical knowledge over other sources of knowledge; (c) underappreciation of the complexity of practice and practice wisdom;(d) possibilities of evidence-based practice thwarting innovation and creativity;(e) vulnerabilities of empirical evidence to be flawed, inconsistent, and influenced by competing interests; (f) situational realities that limit access to and critical appraisal of evidence that access to and critical appraisal of evidence is not feasible or practical; and (g) lack of relationship of evidence-based practice to theory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We call for a recalibrated practice epistemology that promotes a greater appreciation for the myriad sources of knowledge for nursing practice, and offer recommendations for international change in education, literature, scholarship, and public media.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"7-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: For the past 30 years there has been a growing emphasis on evidence as the primary or exclusive basis for nursing practice.

Methods: Critical examination of literature related to evidence-based practice from the 1990s to the present.

Results: This review of the nursing literature from the 1990s to the present reveals that in the midst of the movement to promote evidence-based practice as the gold standard, there have been persistent expressions of concern. These concerns are (a) lack of alignment of evidence-based practice with nursing's disciplinary perspective; (b) wrongful privileging of empirical knowledge over other sources of knowledge; (c) underappreciation of the complexity of practice and practice wisdom;(d) possibilities of evidence-based practice thwarting innovation and creativity;(e) vulnerabilities of empirical evidence to be flawed, inconsistent, and influenced by competing interests; (f) situational realities that limit access to and critical appraisal of evidence that access to and critical appraisal of evidence is not feasible or practical; and (g) lack of relationship of evidence-based practice to theory.

Conclusions: We call for a recalibrated practice epistemology that promotes a greater appreciation for the myriad sources of knowledge for nursing practice, and offer recommendations for international change in education, literature, scholarship, and public media.

护理实践知识:超越证据。
目的:在过去的30年里,越来越强调证据作为护理实践的主要或唯一基础。方法:对20世纪90年代至今与循证实践相关的文献进行批判性审查。结果:从20世纪90年代到现在的护理文献回顾显示,在推动循证实践作为金标准的运动中,一直有持续的担忧表达。这些问题是(a)缺乏循证实践与护理学科观点的一致性;(b)错误地将经验知识置于其他知识来源之上;(c)对实践和实践智慧的复杂性认识不足;(d)基于证据的实践可能阻碍创新和创造力;(e)经验证据容易存在缺陷、不一致和受到竞争利益的影响;(f)限制获取证据和对证据进行批判性评估的现实情况,即获取证据和对证据进行批判性评估是不可行或不实际的;(g)缺乏基于证据的实践与理论的关系。结论:我们呼吁重新调整实践认识论,以促进对护理实践的无数知识来源的更大欣赏,并为教育,文学,学术和公共媒体的国际变革提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信