An Evidence Based Review of Epidurolysis for the Management of Epidural Adhesions.

Q3 Medicine
Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-10-15
Ivan Urits, Ruben H Schwartz, Joseph Brinkman, Lukas Foster, Paulo Miro, Amnon A Berger, Hisham Kassem, Alan D Kaye, Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Omar Viswanath
{"title":"An Evidence Based Review of Epidurolysis for the Management of Epidural Adhesions.","authors":"Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Ruben H Schwartz,&nbsp;Joseph Brinkman,&nbsp;Lukas Foster,&nbsp;Paulo Miro,&nbsp;Amnon A Berger,&nbsp;Hisham Kassem,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Laxmaiah Manchikanti,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents epidurolysis as a procedure to alleviate pain and disability from epidural adhesions. It reviews novel and groundbreaking evidence, describing the background, indications, benefits and adverse events from this procedure in an effort to provide healthcare experts with the data required to decide on an intervention for their patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Epidural adhesions (EA) or epidural fibrosis (EF) is defined as non-physiologic scar formation secondary to a local inflammatory reaction provoked by tissue trauma in the epidural space. Often, it is a sequelae of surgical spine intervention or instrumentation. The cost associated with chronic post-operative back pain has been reported to be up to nearly $12,500 dollars per year; this, coupled with the increasing prevalence of chronic lower back pain and the subsequent increase in surgical management of back pain, renders EF a significant cost and morbidity in the U.S. Though risk factors leading to the development of EA are not well established, epidural fibrosis has been reported to be the culprit in up to 46% of cases of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), a chronic pain condition found in up to 20-54% of patients who receive back surgery. Moreover, EF has also been associated with lumbar radiculopathy after lumbar disc surgery. Epidurolysis is defined as the mechanical dissolution of epidural fibrotic scar tissue for persistent axial spine or radicular pain due to epidural fibrosis that is refractory to conservative therapy Endoscopic lysis of adhesions is a procedural technique which has been shown to improve chronic back pain in one-third to one-half of patients with clinically symptomatic fibrous adhesions. Here we review some of the novel evidence that supports this procedure in EA and FBSS.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The literature concerning epidurolysis in the management of epidural adhesions is insufficient. Prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, have suggested epidurolysis to be effective in terms of pain reduction, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction scores. Observational studies report epidurolysis as a well-tolerated, safe procedure. Current evidence suggests that epidurolysis may be used as an effective treatment modality for epidural adhesions. Nonetheless, further high quality randomized controlled studies assessing the safety and efficacy of epidurolysis in the management of epidural adhesions is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4 Suppl 1","pages":"74-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901122/pdf/PB-50-4S1-74.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review presents epidurolysis as a procedure to alleviate pain and disability from epidural adhesions. It reviews novel and groundbreaking evidence, describing the background, indications, benefits and adverse events from this procedure in an effort to provide healthcare experts with the data required to decide on an intervention for their patients.

Recent findings: Epidural adhesions (EA) or epidural fibrosis (EF) is defined as non-physiologic scar formation secondary to a local inflammatory reaction provoked by tissue trauma in the epidural space. Often, it is a sequelae of surgical spine intervention or instrumentation. The cost associated with chronic post-operative back pain has been reported to be up to nearly $12,500 dollars per year; this, coupled with the increasing prevalence of chronic lower back pain and the subsequent increase in surgical management of back pain, renders EF a significant cost and morbidity in the U.S. Though risk factors leading to the development of EA are not well established, epidural fibrosis has been reported to be the culprit in up to 46% of cases of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), a chronic pain condition found in up to 20-54% of patients who receive back surgery. Moreover, EF has also been associated with lumbar radiculopathy after lumbar disc surgery. Epidurolysis is defined as the mechanical dissolution of epidural fibrotic scar tissue for persistent axial spine or radicular pain due to epidural fibrosis that is refractory to conservative therapy Endoscopic lysis of adhesions is a procedural technique which has been shown to improve chronic back pain in one-third to one-half of patients with clinically symptomatic fibrous adhesions. Here we review some of the novel evidence that supports this procedure in EA and FBSS.

Summary: The literature concerning epidurolysis in the management of epidural adhesions is insufficient. Prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, have suggested epidurolysis to be effective in terms of pain reduction, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction scores. Observational studies report epidurolysis as a well-tolerated, safe procedure. Current evidence suggests that epidurolysis may be used as an effective treatment modality for epidural adhesions. Nonetheless, further high quality randomized controlled studies assessing the safety and efficacy of epidurolysis in the management of epidural adhesions is needed.

硬膜外松解术治疗硬膜外粘连的循证回顾。
综述目的:本文综述了硬膜外松解术作为一种减轻硬膜外粘连引起的疼痛和残疾的方法。它回顾了新颖的和开创性的证据,描述了背景,适应症,效益和不良事件,从这一过程的努力,为医疗保健专家提供所需的数据,以决定对其患者的干预。近期发现:硬膜外粘连(EA)或硬膜外纤维化(EF)被定义为由硬膜外间隙组织创伤引起的局部炎症反应继发的非生理性瘢痕形成。通常,它是手术脊柱介入或内固定的后遗症。据报道,与慢性术后背部疼痛相关的费用高达每年近12500美元;这一点,再加上慢性下背部疼痛的日益流行以及随之而来的背部疼痛手术治疗的增加,使得EF在美国的成本和发病率很高。尽管导致EA发展的危险因素尚未得到很好的确定,但据报道,硬膜外纤维化是高达46%的失败背部手术综合征(FBSS)病例的罪魁祸首,FBSS是一种慢性疼痛状况,在接受背部手术的患者中发现高达20-54%。此外,EF也与腰椎间盘手术后的腰椎神经根病有关。硬膜外粘连松解术定义为硬膜外纤维化瘢痕组织的机械溶解,用于治疗顽固性中轴脊柱或硬膜外纤维化引起的神经根性疼痛,而硬膜外纤维化对保守治疗是难治性的。内镜下粘连松解术是一种手术技术,已被证明可改善三分之一至一半临床症状性纤维粘连患者的慢性背痛。在这里,我们回顾了一些支持EA和FBSS手术的新证据。总结:关于硬膜外粘连处理硬膜外松解术的文献是不够的。前瞻性研究,包括随机对照试验和观察性研究,表明外膜硬膜松解术在减轻疼痛、功能改善和患者满意度评分方面是有效的。观察性研究报告,epidulyysis是一种耐受性良好、安全的手术。目前的证据表明,硬膜外松解术可作为硬膜外粘连的有效治疗方式。尽管如此,需要进一步的高质量随机对照研究来评估硬膜外松解术治疗硬膜外粘连的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信