Reliability and diagnostic performance of smartphone colposcopy.

Serdar Aydın, Ayse F G Karasu, Mustafa Maraşlı, Neslihan Bademler, Gürkan Kıran, Hanife R Dural
{"title":"Reliability and diagnostic performance of smartphone colposcopy.","authors":"Serdar Aydın,&nbsp;Ayse F G Karasu,&nbsp;Mustafa Maraşlı,&nbsp;Neslihan Bademler,&nbsp;Gürkan Kıran,&nbsp;Hanife R Dural","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.13662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of smartphone colposcopy (SPC) versus conventional colposcopy and to determine diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A smartphone back camera was used to capture cervical images before and after application of acetic acid, and after application of lugol solution. Captured images were reviewed independently by two experienced colposcopists and findings were noted as per colposcopy. Smartphone-based diagnostic performance was calculated, and kappa statistics were used for measurement of agreement between SPC and conventional colposcopy findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 women were included in the study. The kappa statistic for intraobserver reliability was 0.77 for both normal colposcopic findings and the transformation zone, indicating substantial agreement. Kappa values were 0.54 for acetowhite epithelium, 0.51 for lugol staining, and 0.51-0.60 for atypical vascularization. Kappa values for interobserver reliability were 0.76 for normal colposcopic findings, 0.56 for acetowhite epithelium, and 0.60 for lugol staining. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of SPC for CIN2+ were 88.2 (95% CI, 72.5-96.7), 48.7 (95% CI, 37.4-60.2), 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPC showed substantial agreement between the histologic diagnoses based on the captured images and conventional colposcopic findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":517240,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"404-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ijgo.13662","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of smartphone colposcopy (SPC) versus conventional colposcopy and to determine diagnostic performance.

Methods: A smartphone back camera was used to capture cervical images before and after application of acetic acid, and after application of lugol solution. Captured images were reviewed independently by two experienced colposcopists and findings were noted as per colposcopy. Smartphone-based diagnostic performance was calculated, and kappa statistics were used for measurement of agreement between SPC and conventional colposcopy findings.

Results: A total of 114 women were included in the study. The kappa statistic for intraobserver reliability was 0.77 for both normal colposcopic findings and the transformation zone, indicating substantial agreement. Kappa values were 0.54 for acetowhite epithelium, 0.51 for lugol staining, and 0.51-0.60 for atypical vascularization. Kappa values for interobserver reliability were 0.76 for normal colposcopic findings, 0.56 for acetowhite epithelium, and 0.60 for lugol staining. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of SPC for CIN2+ were 88.2 (95% CI, 72.5-96.7), 48.7 (95% CI, 37.4-60.2), 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), respectively.

Conclusion: SPC showed substantial agreement between the histologic diagnoses based on the captured images and conventional colposcopic findings.

智能手机阴道镜的可靠性和诊断性能。
目的:评估智能阴道镜(SPC)与传统阴道镜的观察者间和观察者内可靠性,并确定诊断性能。方法:应用智能手机后置摄像头拍摄醋酸敷前后及lugol溶液敷前后宫颈图像。捕获的图像由两位经验丰富的阴道镜检查师独立审查,并根据阴道镜检查记录结果。计算基于智能手机的诊断性能,并使用kappa统计来衡量SPC与传统阴道镜检查结果之间的一致性。结果:114名女性被纳入研究。对于正常阴道镜检查结果和转化区,观察者内信度的kappa统计量为0.77,表明有很大的一致性。乙酰白上皮Kappa值为0.54,lugol染色Kappa值为0.51,非典型血管化Kappa值为0.51-0.60。正常阴道镜检查结果的观察者间可靠性Kappa值为0.76,乙酰白上皮为0.56,lugol染色为0.60。SPC对CIN2+的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为88.2 (95% CI, 72.5 ~ 96.7)、48.7 (95% CI, 37.4 ~ 60.2)、0.42 (95% CI, 0.36 ~ 0.48)和0.91 (95% CI, 0.79 ~ 0.96)。结论:SPC显示了基于捕获图像的组织学诊断与常规阴道镜检查结果之间的实质性一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书