Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT): A Turkish validity and reliability study.

Berker Duman, Oğuzhan Herdi, Damla Sayar-Akaslan, Elvan Onur Kırımker, Burçin Çolak, Ece Ağtaş-Ertan, Gülsüm Çakar, Jamal Hasanlı, Akın Fırat Kocaay, Acar Tüzüner, Meltem Koloğlu, Kaan Karayalçın, Beyza Doğanay-Erdoğan, Deniz Balcı, Hakan Kumbasar, Brian M Iacoviello
{"title":"Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT): A Turkish validity and reliability study.","authors":"Berker Duman,&nbsp;Oğuzhan Herdi,&nbsp;Damla Sayar-Akaslan,&nbsp;Elvan Onur Kırımker,&nbsp;Burçin Çolak,&nbsp;Ece Ağtaş-Ertan,&nbsp;Gülsüm Çakar,&nbsp;Jamal Hasanlı,&nbsp;Akın Fırat Kocaay,&nbsp;Acar Tüzüner,&nbsp;Meltem Koloğlu,&nbsp;Kaan Karayalçın,&nbsp;Beyza Doğanay-Erdoğan,&nbsp;Deniz Balcı,&nbsp;Hakan Kumbasar,&nbsp;Brian M Iacoviello","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2020.19980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Psychosocial and psychiatric evaluations are crucial components of the assessment of a live donor candidate. The Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT) was developed for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LDAT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>132 live kidney or liver donor were referred to assess their psychosocial/psychiatric appropriateness for donation and were randomized for clinical evaluation as usual or with LDAT. The internal consistency of LDAT was measured by Chronbach's alpha coefficient. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The potential validity of LDAT was assessed by comparing LDAT scores to clinical decisions. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare LDAT scores across two clinically classified groups (acceptable/declined). Logistic regression was performed using LDAT scores to predict the clinical decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of LDAT items demonstrate good internal consistency (α=0.773). Inter-rater reliability of LDAT demonstrated strong correlation (ICC=0.72). LDAT scores differentiated the accepted/declined groups, and strongly predicted the clinical decision. With a cut-off score of 60.5, LDAT was found to have high sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of LDAT was found to be a valid and reliable tool. LDAT could be an appropriate tool to assess live donor candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":518528,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"917-922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928253/pdf/tjg-31-12-917.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2020.19980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background/aims: Psychosocial and psychiatric evaluations are crucial components of the assessment of a live donor candidate. The Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT) was developed for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LDAT.

Materials and methods: 132 live kidney or liver donor were referred to assess their psychosocial/psychiatric appropriateness for donation and were randomized for clinical evaluation as usual or with LDAT. The internal consistency of LDAT was measured by Chronbach's alpha coefficient. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The potential validity of LDAT was assessed by comparing LDAT scores to clinical decisions. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare LDAT scores across two clinically classified groups (acceptable/declined). Logistic regression was performed using LDAT scores to predict the clinical decision.

Results: The Turkish version of LDAT items demonstrate good internal consistency (α=0.773). Inter-rater reliability of LDAT demonstrated strong correlation (ICC=0.72). LDAT scores differentiated the accepted/declined groups, and strongly predicted the clinical decision. With a cut-off score of 60.5, LDAT was found to have high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of LDAT was found to be a valid and reliable tool. LDAT could be an appropriate tool to assess live donor candidates.

活体供体评估工具(LDAT):土耳其的效度和信度研究。
背景/目的:社会心理和精神评估是活体供体候选人评估的重要组成部分。为此目的开发了活体供体评估工具(LDAT)。本研究旨在评估土耳其版LDAT量表的效度与信度。材料和方法:对132例活体肾脏或肝脏供者进行社会心理/精神适宜性评估,并随机分为常规或LDAT临床评估组。采用Chronbach’s alpha系数测定LDAT的内部一致性。评估者间信度采用Spearman相关系数测量。通过比较LDAT评分和临床决策来评估LDAT的潜在有效性。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两个临床分类组的LDAT评分(可接受/不合格)。采用LDAT评分进行Logistic回归预测临床决策。结果:土耳其版LDAT项目具有良好的内部一致性(α=0.773)。LDAT的秩间信度呈强相关(ICC=0.72)。LDAT评分区分接受/拒绝组,并强烈预测临床决策。LDAT的临界值为60.5,具有很高的敏感性和特异性。结论:土耳其语版LDAT是一种有效、可靠的检测方法。LDAT可能是评估活体供体候选人的适当工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信