'Homeschooling' and the COVID-19 Crisis: The Insights of Parents on Curriculum and Remote Learning.

Q2 Social Sciences
Interchange Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s10780-021-09420-w
Daniela Fontenelle-Tereshchuk
{"title":"'Homeschooling' and the COVID-19 Crisis: The Insights of Parents on Curriculum and Remote Learning.","authors":"Daniela Fontenelle-Tereshchuk","doi":"10.1007/s10780-021-09420-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 crisis forced schools to temporarily close from March 2020 to June 2020, producing unpredictable changes in instructional contexts and patterns. A new concept of 'homeschooling' emerged which required parents to support the implementation of the curriculum through remote learning. This article is based on a case study focusing on the perceptions of experiences of ten parents of Elementary school children during the school lockdown in Alberta, Canada. Parents argue that the schools' demands on them were unreasonable. These added to the stress of the quarantine and professional losses, and to the burden of working full-time, fulfilling household responsibilities, and having children rely mostly on parents to deliver an often brief, 'shallow' weekly lesson plan that lacked clear expectations and reliable assessment pieces. Parents also strongly cast doubts on the popular reliability of online education by suggesting the unsuitability of online tools to promote independent learning among young children. The study may provide valuable contributions to further inform how to better support learning from home during this ongoing pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":39982,"journal":{"name":"Interchange","volume":"52 2","pages":"167-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10780-021-09420-w","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09420-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis forced schools to temporarily close from March 2020 to June 2020, producing unpredictable changes in instructional contexts and patterns. A new concept of 'homeschooling' emerged which required parents to support the implementation of the curriculum through remote learning. This article is based on a case study focusing on the perceptions of experiences of ten parents of Elementary school children during the school lockdown in Alberta, Canada. Parents argue that the schools' demands on them were unreasonable. These added to the stress of the quarantine and professional losses, and to the burden of working full-time, fulfilling household responsibilities, and having children rely mostly on parents to deliver an often brief, 'shallow' weekly lesson plan that lacked clear expectations and reliable assessment pieces. Parents also strongly cast doubts on the popular reliability of online education by suggesting the unsuitability of online tools to promote independent learning among young children. The study may provide valuable contributions to further inform how to better support learning from home during this ongoing pandemic.

Abstract Image

“在家上学”与COVID-19危机:家长对课程和远程学习的见解。
2019冠状病毒病危机迫使学校从2020年3月至2020年6月暂时关闭,导致教学环境和模式发生不可预测的变化。“在家上学”的新概念出现了,它要求家长通过远程学习来支持课程的实施。本文基于一个案例研究,重点关注加拿大阿尔伯塔省学校封锁期间十名小学生家长的经历。家长们认为学校对他们的要求是不合理的。这增加了隔离和专业人员损失的压力,也增加了全职工作、履行家庭责任和养育孩子的负担,这些负担主要依赖父母提供通常简短、“肤浅”的每周课程计划,缺乏明确的期望和可靠的评估。家长们还强烈质疑在线教育的普遍可靠性,认为在线工具不适合促进幼儿的独立学习。这项研究可能为进一步了解如何在当前大流行期间更好地支持在家学习提供有价值的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interchange
Interchange Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Interchange, an externally refereed educational quarterly, embraces educational theory, research, analysis, history, philosophy, policy and practices. The journal seeks to foster exchanges among practitioners, policy-makers, and scholars and to provide a forum for comment on issues and trends in education. The journal specializes in frank argumentative articles on the fundamental purposes of education. Its articles typically challenge conventional assumptions about education and higher education and do so from perspectives in philosophy or the social sciences. A special feature is the publishing of responses, and frequently response to responses, in the same issue as the article which provoked them. Its authors are scattered throught the world. All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信