Clinical Pregnancy After Elimination of Embryo Fragments Before Fresh Cleavage-stage Embryo Transfer.

Luis H Sordia-Hernandez, Felipe A Morales-Martinez, Lorna M Frazer-Moreira, Lilith Villarreal-Pineda, María Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro, Otto H Valdez-Martinez
{"title":"Clinical Pregnancy After Elimination of Embryo Fragments Before Fresh Cleavage-stage Embryo Transfer.","authors":"Luis H Sordia-Hernandez,&nbsp;Felipe A Morales-Martinez,&nbsp;Lorna M Frazer-Moreira,&nbsp;Lilith Villarreal-Pineda,&nbsp;María Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro,&nbsp;Otto H Valdez-Martinez","doi":"10.18502/jfrh.v14i3.4674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine if the elimination of fragments in cleavage-stage embryos, before fresh transfer, improves pregnancy rates in <i>in vitro</i> fertilization cycles. <b>Materials and methods:</b> This is a Prospective observational case-control study carried out at a University Reproductive Center. We included Twenty-six infertile patients divided into two groups. Group one: 13 patients with embryos classified as grade B and C (embryos with fragments) according to the Hill classification, and Group two: 13 patients with grade A embryos (embryos with no fragments). Embryo Defragmentation was performed in embryos of group one 65 to 68 hours after conventional fertilization. Fresh embryo transfer was made after two hours post fragments removal. Reproductive results were evaluated and compared between both groups. <b>Results:</b> The total number of clinical pregnancies was nine. In group one there were 5 (38.5 %); in group two, there were 4 (30.8%). The difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.68). Two abortions were reported in the study, both in group one; were fragment elimination was performed. This represents an abortion rate of 40% in patients who got pregnant in this group. These patients had twice the probability of suffering an abortion (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.37). Ongoing pregnancies were similar in both groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Removal of fragments in freshly transferred day three embryos could be an alternative to increase clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates in patients who have only poor-quality embryos. Despite the relationship with a higher abortion rate, this strategy could represent a real alternative for this type of patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":15845,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/2e/JFRH-14-198.PMC7868653.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v14i3.4674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the elimination of fragments in cleavage-stage embryos, before fresh transfer, improves pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles. Materials and methods: This is a Prospective observational case-control study carried out at a University Reproductive Center. We included Twenty-six infertile patients divided into two groups. Group one: 13 patients with embryos classified as grade B and C (embryos with fragments) according to the Hill classification, and Group two: 13 patients with grade A embryos (embryos with no fragments). Embryo Defragmentation was performed in embryos of group one 65 to 68 hours after conventional fertilization. Fresh embryo transfer was made after two hours post fragments removal. Reproductive results were evaluated and compared between both groups. Results: The total number of clinical pregnancies was nine. In group one there were 5 (38.5 %); in group two, there were 4 (30.8%). The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). Two abortions were reported in the study, both in group one; were fragment elimination was performed. This represents an abortion rate of 40% in patients who got pregnant in this group. These patients had twice the probability of suffering an abortion (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.37). Ongoing pregnancies were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Removal of fragments in freshly transferred day three embryos could be an alternative to increase clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates in patients who have only poor-quality embryos. Despite the relationship with a higher abortion rate, this strategy could represent a real alternative for this type of patient.

新鲜卵裂期胚胎移植前去除胚胎碎片后的临床妊娠。
目的:探讨新鲜移植前去除卵裂期胚胎片段是否能提高体外受精周期的受孕率。材料和方法:这是一项在某大学生殖中心进行的前瞻性观察性病例对照研究。我们将26例不孕症患者分为两组。第一组:按Hill分级分为B级和C级(有碎片)胚胎13例;第二组:A级(无碎片)胚胎13例。第一组胚胎在常规受精后65 ~ 68小时进行胚胎碎片整理。碎片取出后2小时进行新鲜胚胎移植。对两组生殖结果进行评价和比较。结果:临床妊娠共9例。第一组5例(38.5%);第二组4例(30.8%)。差异无统计学意义(p = 0.68)。研究中报告了两例流产,均为第一组;进行碎片消除。这意味着在这一组怀孕的患者中,流产率为40%。这些患者有两倍的可能性遭受流产(OR 2.1;95% ci 1.4-3.37)。两组的持续妊娠情况相似。结论:对于只有低质量胚胎的患者,在刚移植的第三天胚胎中去除碎片可以提高临床妊娠率和持续妊娠率。尽管与较高的流产率有关,但这种策略对于这类患者来说可能是一种真正的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family & Reproductive Health (JFRH) is the quarterly official journal of Vali–e–Asr Reproductive Health Research Center. This journal features fulllength, peerreviewed papers reporting original research, clinical case histories, review articles, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the scientific and medical aspects of reproductive physiology and pathology including genetics, endocrinology, andrology, embryology, gynecologic urology, fetomaternal medicine, oncology, infectious disease, public health, nutrition, surgery, menopause, family planning, infertility, psychiatry–psychology, demographic modeling, perinatalogy–neonatolgy ethics and social issues, and pharmacotherapy. A high scientific and editorial standard is maintained throughout the journal along with a regular rate of publication. All published articles will become the property of the JFRH. The editor and publisher accept no responsibility for the statements expressed by the authors here in. Also they do not guarantee, warrant or endorse any product or service advertised in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信