Visual biofeedback for paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM).

IF 2.2
Rachelle Alyce LeBlanc, Daniel Aalto, Caroline C Jeffery
{"title":"Visual biofeedback for paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM).","authors":"Rachelle Alyce LeBlanc,&nbsp;Daniel Aalto,&nbsp;Caroline C Jeffery","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00495-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is a common condition where the vocal folds inappropriately adduct during inspiration. This results in dyspnea and occasionally significant distress. The condition is thought to be primarily functional, with behavioural therapy considered mainstay in the non-acute setting. However, practice variations and limited access to speech language pathology (SLP) services can pose management challenges. We aimed to examine the efficacy of surgeon performed visual biofeedback as first-line treatment for PVFM.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients referred for possible PVFM and congruent laryngoscopy findings over a two-year period were included. Patients were excluded if they presented in acute distress, had alternate diagnosis to explain symptomology and/or coexisting untreated lower respiratory pathology. Patients underwent immediate surgeon-performed visual biofeedback on the same visit day. The primary outcome of interest was change in Dyspnea Index (DI) scores pre- and post-intervention 3 months follow-up. The secondary outcome measured was change in asthma medication use from baseline to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 34 patients presenting, 25 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 72% were female with an average age of 36.9 ± 14.1. Approximately 48% of patients had a diagnosis of well-controlled asthma at presentation and co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses were common (52%). Pre- and post-intervention analysis showed significant improvement in DI scores (p < 0.001) and reduction in bronchodilator use (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is a prospective study that evaluates the role of visual biofeedback in PVFM patients. Our data suggests that visual biofeedback effectively reduces short-term subjective symptoms and asthma medication use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00495-0","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00495-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is a common condition where the vocal folds inappropriately adduct during inspiration. This results in dyspnea and occasionally significant distress. The condition is thought to be primarily functional, with behavioural therapy considered mainstay in the non-acute setting. However, practice variations and limited access to speech language pathology (SLP) services can pose management challenges. We aimed to examine the efficacy of surgeon performed visual biofeedback as first-line treatment for PVFM.

Study design: Prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative clinical study.

Methods: Adult patients referred for possible PVFM and congruent laryngoscopy findings over a two-year period were included. Patients were excluded if they presented in acute distress, had alternate diagnosis to explain symptomology and/or coexisting untreated lower respiratory pathology. Patients underwent immediate surgeon-performed visual biofeedback on the same visit day. The primary outcome of interest was change in Dyspnea Index (DI) scores pre- and post-intervention 3 months follow-up. The secondary outcome measured was change in asthma medication use from baseline to follow-up.

Results: Of 34 patients presenting, 25 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 72% were female with an average age of 36.9 ± 14.1. Approximately 48% of patients had a diagnosis of well-controlled asthma at presentation and co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses were common (52%). Pre- and post-intervention analysis showed significant improvement in DI scores (p < 0.001) and reduction in bronchodilator use (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: This is a prospective study that evaluates the role of visual biofeedback in PVFM patients. Our data suggests that visual biofeedback effectively reduces short-term subjective symptoms and asthma medication use.

Level of evidence: 3.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

矛盾声带运动(PVFM)的视觉生物反馈。
目的:声带矛盾运动(PVFM)是吸气时声带不适当内收的一种常见情况。这导致呼吸困难和偶尔明显的窘迫。这种情况被认为主要是功能性的,在非急性情况下,行为治疗被认为是主要的。然而,实践变化和有限的访问语音语言病理学(SLP)服务可以构成管理挑战。我们的目的是检查外科医生进行视觉生物反馈作为PVFM一线治疗的疗效。研究设计:前瞻性、非随机、非比较临床研究。方法:两年内因可能的PVFM和喉镜检查结果一致而转诊的成年患者包括在内。如果患者表现为急性窘迫,有替代诊断来解释症状和/或同时存在未经治疗的下呼吸道病理,则排除。患者在同一天就诊当天立即接受了外科医生进行的视觉生物反馈。主要观察结果为干预前后3个月随访时呼吸困难指数(DI)评分的变化。测量的次要结果是从基线到随访期间哮喘药物使用的变化。结果:34例患者中,25例符合纳入标准。其中女性占72%,平均年龄36.9±14.1岁。大约48%的患者在发病时被诊断为控制良好的哮喘,并伴有精神疾病的诊断很常见(52%)。结论:这是一项评估视觉生物反馈在PVFM患者中的作用的前瞻性研究。我们的数据表明,视觉生物反馈有效地减少了短期主观症状和哮喘药物的使用。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信