Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in a consecutive series of 72 patients.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mirza Pojskic, Benjamin Saβ, Benjamin Völlger, Christopher Nimsky, Barbara Carl
{"title":"Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in a consecutive series of 72 patients.","authors":"Mirza Pojskic,&nbsp;Benjamin Saβ,&nbsp;Benjamin Völlger,&nbsp;Christopher Nimsky,&nbsp;Barbara Carl","doi":"10.17305/bjbms.2020.5261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) has become the standard of minimally invasive lumbar segmental scoliosis treatment. Our objective is to determine the safety and efficacy of XLIF in spinal canal stenosis (SCS) and spondylodiscitis (SD). Patients treated with XLIF in our department between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient records with clinical and radiographical parameters were evaluated. The patient cohort consists of 40 male and 32 female patients with a median age of 66.6 years. Forty-five patients had an SCS and 27 patients SD. The mean follow-up was 23 months. One level XLIF was performed in 49 patients, 2 levels in 15, 3 levels in 7 patients and 4 levels in 1 patient. All but one patient received an additional dorsal stabilization. The pain was present in all patients with a mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 8.8 vs. postoperative VAS of 2.8 (p<0.05). Preoperative neurological deficits were found in 44 patients. Only 6 patients had a neurological deterioration, 45 patients improved, and 21 patients remained unchanged. One patient experienced a perioperative complication.  Non-fusion occurred in 8 cases. There were no outcome differences regarding pain and radiological outcome between patients with SCS and SD as well as between patients with one level vs. multilevel surgery. Baseline characteristics and the radiological outcome did not differ between the two groups. Patients with SD had a higher rate of worsening of neurological deficits following surgery, a higher rate of non-fusion, and a longer hospital stay. Patients with spinal canal stenosis SCS had a longer surgery time and more frequent adjacent segment disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9147,"journal":{"name":"Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences","volume":"21 5","pages":"587-597"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381202/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2020.5261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) has become the standard of minimally invasive lumbar segmental scoliosis treatment. Our objective is to determine the safety and efficacy of XLIF in spinal canal stenosis (SCS) and spondylodiscitis (SD). Patients treated with XLIF in our department between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient records with clinical and radiographical parameters were evaluated. The patient cohort consists of 40 male and 32 female patients with a median age of 66.6 years. Forty-five patients had an SCS and 27 patients SD. The mean follow-up was 23 months. One level XLIF was performed in 49 patients, 2 levels in 15, 3 levels in 7 patients and 4 levels in 1 patient. All but one patient received an additional dorsal stabilization. The pain was present in all patients with a mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 8.8 vs. postoperative VAS of 2.8 (p<0.05). Preoperative neurological deficits were found in 44 patients. Only 6 patients had a neurological deterioration, 45 patients improved, and 21 patients remained unchanged. One patient experienced a perioperative complication.  Non-fusion occurred in 8 cases. There were no outcome differences regarding pain and radiological outcome between patients with SCS and SD as well as between patients with one level vs. multilevel surgery. Baseline characteristics and the radiological outcome did not differ between the two groups. Patients with SD had a higher rate of worsening of neurological deficits following surgery, a higher rate of non-fusion, and a longer hospital stay. Patients with spinal canal stenosis SCS had a longer surgery time and more frequent adjacent segment disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

极端外侧体间融合(XLIF)在连续72例患者中。
极外侧椎体间融合术(XLIF)已成为微创腰椎节段性脊柱侧凸治疗的标准。我们的目的是确定XLIF治疗椎管狭窄(SCS)和脊椎椎间盘炎(SD)的安全性和有效性。回顾性分析2012年至2018年我科XLIF治疗的患者。评估患者的临床和影像学参数记录。患者队列包括40名男性和32名女性患者,中位年龄为66.6岁。45例有SCS, 27例有SD。平均随访23个月。49例患者行1级XLIF, 15例患者行2级XLIF, 7例患者行3级XLIF, 1例患者行4级XLIF。除一名患者外,所有患者均接受了额外的背部稳定。所有患者均出现疼痛,平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)为8.8分,术后VAS为2.8分(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences
Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (BJBMS) is an international, English-language, peer reviewed journal, publishing original articles from different disciplines of basic medical sciences. BJBMS welcomes original research and comprehensive reviews as well as short research communications in the field of biochemistry, genetics, immunology, microbiology, pathology, pharmacology, pharmaceutical sciences and physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信