Image Analysis for Ultrasound Quality Assurance.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasonic Imaging Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-15 DOI:10.1177/0161734621992332
Majed H Aljahdali, Alexander Woodman, Lamiaa Al-Jamea, Saeed M Albatati, Chris Williams
{"title":"Image Analysis for Ultrasound Quality Assurance.","authors":"Majed H Aljahdali,&nbsp;Alexander Woodman,&nbsp;Lamiaa Al-Jamea,&nbsp;Saeed M Albatati,&nbsp;Chris Williams","doi":"10.1177/0161734621992332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality assurance (QA) of ultrasound transducers is often identified as an area requiring continuous development in terms of the tools available to users. Periodic evaluation of the transducers as part of the QA protocol is important, since the quality of the diagnostics. Some of the key criteria determining the process of developing a QA protocol include the complexity of setup, the time required, accuracy, and potential automation to achieve scale. For the current study, a total of eight different ultrasound machines (12 transducers) with linear transducers were obtained separately. The results from these 12 transducers were used to validate the protocol. WAD-QC was used as part of this study to assess in-air reverberation patterns obtained from ultrasound transducers. Initially, three in-air reverberation images obtained from normal transducers and three obtained from defective transducers were used to calculate the uniformity parameters. The results were applied to 12 other images obtained from independent sources. Image processing results with WAD-QC were verified with imageJ. A comparison of raw data for uniformity showed consistency, and using controls based on mean absolute deviation yielded identical results. WAD-QC can be considered as a powerful mechanism for quick, efficient, and accurate analysis of in-air reverberation patterns obtained from ultrasound transducers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49401,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0161734621992332","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0161734621992332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality assurance (QA) of ultrasound transducers is often identified as an area requiring continuous development in terms of the tools available to users. Periodic evaluation of the transducers as part of the QA protocol is important, since the quality of the diagnostics. Some of the key criteria determining the process of developing a QA protocol include the complexity of setup, the time required, accuracy, and potential automation to achieve scale. For the current study, a total of eight different ultrasound machines (12 transducers) with linear transducers were obtained separately. The results from these 12 transducers were used to validate the protocol. WAD-QC was used as part of this study to assess in-air reverberation patterns obtained from ultrasound transducers. Initially, three in-air reverberation images obtained from normal transducers and three obtained from defective transducers were used to calculate the uniformity parameters. The results were applied to 12 other images obtained from independent sources. Image processing results with WAD-QC were verified with imageJ. A comparison of raw data for uniformity showed consistency, and using controls based on mean absolute deviation yielded identical results. WAD-QC can be considered as a powerful mechanism for quick, efficient, and accurate analysis of in-air reverberation patterns obtained from ultrasound transducers.

超声质量保证的图像分析。
超声换能器的质量保证(QA)通常被认为是一个需要不断开发的领域,需要向用户提供可用的工具。定期评估换能器作为QA协议的一部分是很重要的,因为诊断的质量。确定开发QA协议过程的一些关键标准包括设置的复杂性、所需的时间、准确性和实现规模的潜在自动化。本研究共获得8台不同的超声机(12台换能器),分别配备线性换能器。这12个传感器的结果被用来验证该方案。WAD-QC被用作本研究的一部分,以评估从超声波换能器获得的空气中混响模式。首先,利用正常换能器和缺陷换能器分别获得的三张空气混响图像计算均匀性参数。将结果应用于从独立来源获得的其他12幅图像。用imageJ对WAD-QC的图像处理结果进行验证。对原始数据的一致性比较显示出一致性,使用基于平均绝对偏差的对照得到相同的结果。WAD-QC可以被认为是一种强大的机制,用于快速,高效,准确地分析从超声波换能器获得的空气中混响模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasonic Imaging
Ultrasonic Imaging 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasonic Imaging provides rapid publication for original and exceptional papers concerned with the development and application of ultrasonic-imaging technology. Ultrasonic Imaging publishes articles in the following areas: theoretical and experimental aspects of advanced methods and instrumentation for imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信