Epistaxis first-aid management: a needs assessment among healthcare providers.

IF 2.2
Leigh Sowerby, Chandheeb Rajakumar, Matthew Davis, Brian Rotenberg
{"title":"Epistaxis first-aid management: a needs assessment among healthcare providers.","authors":"Leigh Sowerby,&nbsp;Chandheeb Rajakumar,&nbsp;Matthew Davis,&nbsp;Brian Rotenberg","doi":"10.1186/s40463-020-00485-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a needs assessment of epistaxis first-aid measures practiced by family physicians and Emergency Department (ED) staff in London, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paper-based multiple-choice questionnaires were distributed to participants. Participant recruitment was conducted in two parts: 1) 28 Emergency Medicine (EM) attending physicians, 21 resident physicians training in the ED, and 26 ED nurses were surveyed while on duty in the ED; 2) 27 family physicians providing walk-in or urgent care and attending a continuing medical education (CME) event were also surveyed. Respondents were asked to identify where to apply compression to the nose and how patients should be positioned during acute epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding where to apply compression, 19% of family physicians, 43% of EM physicians, 24% of residents, and 8% of ED nurses responded correctly. Regarding positioning, all groups responded similarly with 54-62% responding correctly. Twenty-one percent of emergency physicians, 19% of residents, 11% of family physicians, and 4% of nurses responded correctly to both questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most family physicians, EM attending physicians, ED nurses, and residents could not correctly identify basic first-aid measures for acute epistaxis. This study identifies an area where knowledge is lacking and the potential for improvement in patient management and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-020-00485-8","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00485-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a needs assessment of epistaxis first-aid measures practiced by family physicians and Emergency Department (ED) staff in London, Ontario, Canada.

Methods: Paper-based multiple-choice questionnaires were distributed to participants. Participant recruitment was conducted in two parts: 1) 28 Emergency Medicine (EM) attending physicians, 21 resident physicians training in the ED, and 26 ED nurses were surveyed while on duty in the ED; 2) 27 family physicians providing walk-in or urgent care and attending a continuing medical education (CME) event were also surveyed. Respondents were asked to identify where to apply compression to the nose and how patients should be positioned during acute epistaxis.

Results: Regarding where to apply compression, 19% of family physicians, 43% of EM physicians, 24% of residents, and 8% of ED nurses responded correctly. Regarding positioning, all groups responded similarly with 54-62% responding correctly. Twenty-one percent of emergency physicians, 19% of residents, 11% of family physicians, and 4% of nurses responded correctly to both questions.

Conclusions: Most family physicians, EM attending physicians, ED nurses, and residents could not correctly identify basic first-aid measures for acute epistaxis. This study identifies an area where knowledge is lacking and the potential for improvement in patient management and education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

鼻出血急救管理:医疗保健提供者的需求评估。
目的:对加拿大安大略省伦敦的家庭医生和急诊科(ED)工作人员实施的鼻出血急救措施进行需求评估。方法:向参与者发放纸质选择问卷。参与者招募分两部分进行:1)对28名急诊内科(EM)主治医师、21名在急诊科培训的住院医师和26名在急诊科值班的急诊科护士进行调查;2)对27名提供上门或急诊服务并参加继续医学教育(CME)活动的家庭医生进行了调查。受访者被要求确定在哪里应用压缩到鼻子和如何患者应该定位在急性鼻出血。结果:关于在哪里应用压缩,19%的家庭医生、43%的急诊医生、24%的住院医生和8%的急诊科护士回答正确。在定位问题上,所有群体的回答都很相似,正确率为54-62%。21%的急诊医生、19%的住院医生、11%的家庭医生和4%的护士正确回答了这两个问题。结论:大多数家庭医生、急诊主治医生、急诊科护士和住院医师不能正确识别急性鼻出血的基本急救措施。这项研究确定了一个知识缺乏的领域,以及在患者管理和教育方面改进的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信