Management of late preterm preeclampsia: a comparison of maternal and fetal indications for delivery.

Stephanie Galibert, Emerson Keenan, Roxanne Hastie, Fiona C Brownfoot
{"title":"Management of late preterm preeclampsia: a comparison of maternal and fetal indications for delivery.","authors":"Stephanie Galibert,&nbsp;Emerson Keenan,&nbsp;Roxanne Hastie,&nbsp;Fiona C Brownfoot","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate delivery indications for women with late preterm preeclampsia and evaluate whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at the Mercy Hospital for Women (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia). Indication for delivery was assessed among women presenting with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Baseline maternal and disease characteristics, preeclampsia features at delivery and postnatal outcomes were compared between patients delivering for maternal, fetal, or for both maternal and fetal indications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. We found that 55.5% of women were delivered on maternal grounds compared to 27.2% requiring delivery for fetal indications; and 17.3% for both maternal and fetal indications (<i>p</i> < .0001). At diagnosis, intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers increased the risk of requiring delivery for fetal indications by 3.5 times and 2.4 times respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women presenting with late preterm preeclampsia primarily required delivery for maternal disease progression rather than fetal compromise.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"5431-5437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate delivery indications for women with late preterm preeclampsia and evaluate whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at the Mercy Hospital for Women (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia). Indication for delivery was assessed among women presenting with preeclampsia between 30+0 and 36+0 weeks' gestation. Baseline maternal and disease characteristics, preeclampsia features at delivery and postnatal outcomes were compared between patients delivering for maternal, fetal, or for both maternal and fetal indications.

Results: 173 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia between 30+0 and 36+0 weeks' gestation. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. We found that 55.5% of women were delivered on maternal grounds compared to 27.2% requiring delivery for fetal indications; and 17.3% for both maternal and fetal indications (p < .0001). At diagnosis, intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers increased the risk of requiring delivery for fetal indications by 3.5 times and 2.4 times respectively.

Conclusion: Women presenting with late preterm preeclampsia primarily required delivery for maternal disease progression rather than fetal compromise.

晚期早产先兆子痫的管理:产妇和胎儿分娩指征的比较。
目的:探讨晚期早产先兆子痫妇女的分娩指征,并评价疾病表现是否预示着分娩指征。方法:我们在妇女慈善医院(澳大利亚墨尔本的一家三级医院)进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。在妊娠30+0至36+0周之间出现先兆子痫的妇女中评估分娩指征。对产妇和疾病的基线特征、分娩时子痫前期特征和产后结局进行比较,比较产妇、胎儿或产妇和胎儿两种指征分娩的患者。结果:173例妇女在妊娠30+0 ~ 36+0周被诊断为先兆子痫。两组产妇的基线特征相似。我们发现55.5%的妇女因产妇原因分娩,而27.2%的妇女因胎儿指征需要分娩;结论:晚期早产先兆子痫患者主要需要分娩是因为母体疾病进展,而不是胎儿受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信