Self-Report and Biological Indexes of Work-Related Stress in Neonatal Healthcare Professionals: A Repeated-Measures Observational Study.

Monica Fumagalli, Livio Provenzi, Gabriele Sorrentino, Francesca Ciceri, Camilla Fontana, Sofia Passera, Michela Moncecchi, Laura Plevani, Dario Laquintana, Renato Borgatti, Fabio Mosca, Rosario Montirosso
{"title":"Self-Report and Biological Indexes of Work-Related Stress in Neonatal Healthcare Professionals: A Repeated-Measures Observational Study.","authors":"Monica Fumagalli,&nbsp;Livio Provenzi,&nbsp;Gabriele Sorrentino,&nbsp;Francesca Ciceri,&nbsp;Camilla Fontana,&nbsp;Sofia Passera,&nbsp;Michela Moncecchi,&nbsp;Laura Plevani,&nbsp;Dario Laquintana,&nbsp;Renato Borgatti,&nbsp;Fabio Mosca,&nbsp;Rosario Montirosso","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare providers working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are considered at high risk for psychological work-related stress.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate both perceived and biological measures of work-related stress in neonatal healthcare professionals and to compare professionals working in the NICU with their colleagues working in less critical environments (ie, neonatal wards [NWs]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The salivary cortisol level at the beginning (CORT-B) and at the end (CORT-E) of a daily work shift was collected once a week for 6 weeks and a psychological questionnaire was submitted to NW and NICU workers of a tertiary university center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences emerged in the overall cortisol secretion between professionals (NW 45 vs NICU 28), but the decrease in the mean cortisol values between CORT-B and CORT-E was less pronounced in NICU professionals (P < .001) who had greater psychological stress (P < .001). Lack of correlation between perceived and biological indexes was observed.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>NICU professionals reported greater levels of self-perceived psychological stress, especially in terms of professional self-doubt and the complexity of interactions with infants and their parents.The disconnection between psychological and biological indexes raises the issue that work-related stress might be covert to the professionals themselves. Dedicated resources should be developed to address quality of life and the work environment of NICU professionals.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>The absence of a correlation between perceived and biological indexes highlights the need to incorporate multidimensional physiological and biological measurements in evaluating burnout levels in neonatal healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"E120-E128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are considered at high risk for psychological work-related stress.

Purpose: To evaluate both perceived and biological measures of work-related stress in neonatal healthcare professionals and to compare professionals working in the NICU with their colleagues working in less critical environments (ie, neonatal wards [NWs]).

Methods: The salivary cortisol level at the beginning (CORT-B) and at the end (CORT-E) of a daily work shift was collected once a week for 6 weeks and a psychological questionnaire was submitted to NW and NICU workers of a tertiary university center.

Results: No differences emerged in the overall cortisol secretion between professionals (NW 45 vs NICU 28), but the decrease in the mean cortisol values between CORT-B and CORT-E was less pronounced in NICU professionals (P < .001) who had greater psychological stress (P < .001). Lack of correlation between perceived and biological indexes was observed.

Implications for practice: NICU professionals reported greater levels of self-perceived psychological stress, especially in terms of professional self-doubt and the complexity of interactions with infants and their parents.The disconnection between psychological and biological indexes raises the issue that work-related stress might be covert to the professionals themselves. Dedicated resources should be developed to address quality of life and the work environment of NICU professionals.

Implications for research: The absence of a correlation between perceived and biological indexes highlights the need to incorporate multidimensional physiological and biological measurements in evaluating burnout levels in neonatal healthcare providers.

新生儿医护人员工作压力的自我报告和生物学指标:一项重复测量观察性研究。
背景:在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)工作的医疗保健提供者被认为是高风险的心理工作压力。目的:评估新生儿医疗保健专业人员工作压力的感知和生物学测量,并比较在新生儿重症监护室工作的专业人员与在不那么关键的环境(即新生儿病房[NWs])工作的同事。方法:对某大专中心NW和NICU工作人员进行为期6周、每周1次的唾液皮质醇(CORT-B)和期末皮质醇(CORT-E)采集,并填写心理问卷。结果:NICU专业人员(NW 45与NICU 28)的皮质醇总分泌量无差异,但NICU专业人员(心理压力较大)的CORT-B和CORT-E的平均皮质醇值下降不明显(P < 0.001)。观察到知觉指标与生物学指标之间缺乏相关性。实践启示:新生儿重症监护室专业人员报告了更高水平的自我感知心理压力,特别是在专业自我怀疑和与婴儿及其父母互动的复杂性方面。心理和生理指标之间的脱节提出了一个问题,即工作压力可能对专业人士本身是隐蔽的。应该开发专门的资源来解决新生儿重症监护室专业人员的生活质量和工作环境问题。研究意义:感知指标和生物学指标之间缺乏相关性,这突出了在评估新生儿医疗保健提供者的倦怠水平时纳入多维生理和生物学测量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信