Balancing practicality and validity of elder abuse identification measures: using data from adult protective services investigations.

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-03 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2021.1876579
Kendon J Conrad, Pi-Ju Liu, Zachary Hass, Karen M Conrad
{"title":"Balancing practicality and validity of elder abuse identification measures: using data from adult protective services investigations.","authors":"Kendon J Conrad,&nbsp;Pi-Ju Liu,&nbsp;Zachary Hass,&nbsp;Karen M Conrad","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2021.1876579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives</b>. In testing a comprehensive decision support system for Adult Protective Services (APS), this study addressed two problems common in APS research and practice: the psychometric quality of the measures and measurement burden. <b>Research Design and Methods</b>. Data were generated on 1,472 APS cases over six months in two California counties using the Identification, Services and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, a comprehensive decision support system for APS. The ISO Matrix uses Short-Forms developed from the Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS). Mini-Forms were developed from the Short-Forms and tested in order to reduce measurement burden. Mini-Forms were developed on each measure using sensitivity and specificity of the items in predicting the criterion of substantiation (yes/no). Psychometric quality was addressed by estimating predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of Short-Forms. Predictive validity and reliability were also estimated on the Mini-Forms as was their correlation with the Short-Forms. <b>Results</b>. On Short-Forms, good predictive validity was found for all measures except those that were very rare. Results for even shorter Mini-Forms were mixed, and some will require further research on their reliability and validity. <b>Discussion and Implications</b>. Short-Forms had good psychometric properties and some Mini-Forms did as well. Ongoing adoption by several California counties and Montana demonstrates the viability and sustainability of using the ISO Matrix for research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2021.1876579","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2021.1876579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Objectives. In testing a comprehensive decision support system for Adult Protective Services (APS), this study addressed two problems common in APS research and practice: the psychometric quality of the measures and measurement burden. Research Design and Methods. Data were generated on 1,472 APS cases over six months in two California counties using the Identification, Services and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, a comprehensive decision support system for APS. The ISO Matrix uses Short-Forms developed from the Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS). Mini-Forms were developed from the Short-Forms and tested in order to reduce measurement burden. Mini-Forms were developed on each measure using sensitivity and specificity of the items in predicting the criterion of substantiation (yes/no). Psychometric quality was addressed by estimating predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of Short-Forms. Predictive validity and reliability were also estimated on the Mini-Forms as was their correlation with the Short-Forms. Results. On Short-Forms, good predictive validity was found for all measures except those that were very rare. Results for even shorter Mini-Forms were mixed, and some will require further research on their reliability and validity. Discussion and Implications. Short-Forms had good psychometric properties and some Mini-Forms did as well. Ongoing adoption by several California counties and Montana demonstrates the viability and sustainability of using the ISO Matrix for research and practice.

平衡老年人虐待识别措施的实用性和有效性:使用成人保护服务调查的数据。
背景和目标。在测试成人保护服务(APS)综合决策支持系统的过程中,本研究解决了APS研究和实践中常见的两个问题:测量的心理测量质量和测量负担。研究设计与方法。使用鉴定、服务和结果(ISO)矩阵(APS的综合决策支持系统),对加利福尼亚州两个县六个月内的1,472例APS病例进行了数据生成。ISO矩阵使用从虐待老人决策支持系统(EADSS)发展而来的简短表格。迷你表格是在短表格的基础上开发出来的,并进行了测试,以减轻测量负担。在预测证实标准(是/否)时,利用项目的敏感性和特异性为每个测量方法开发了迷你表格。通过估计预测效度和短表格的Cronbach's alpha来解决心理测量质量问题。预测效度和信度也估计了迷你表格,以及它们与简短表格的相关性。结果。在简短形式,良好的预测效度被发现除了那些非常罕见的措施。即使是更短的迷你表格的结果也是混杂的,其中一些表格的可靠性和有效性还需要进一步的研究。讨论和启示。短表格有很好的心理测量特性,一些迷你表格也有。加利福尼亚州和蒙大拿州的几个县正在采用ISO矩阵,这表明在研究和实践中使用ISO矩阵的可行性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信