Treating patients with venous thromboembolism: initial strategies and long-term secondary prevention.

Menno V Huisman, Henri Bounameaux
{"title":"Treating patients with venous thromboembolism: initial strategies and long-term secondary prevention.","authors":"Menno V Huisman,&nbsp;Henri Bounameaux","doi":"10.1055/s-2005-916167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) currently involves a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulation. After cessation of therapy, however, recurrent venous thrombosis occurs at rates of 6 to 9% per year. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of extending anticoagulation beyond 3 months for the prevention of recurrent VTE events. Despite this, many eligible patients do not receive the required thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of recurrent VTE remains too high for a preventable condition. A reason for failure to use prophylaxis is the fear of bleeding complications with current oral anticoagulants such as warfarin. Warfarin has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile and a variable dose-response relationship that requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to maintain a target intensity that is both safe and effective. Alternative strategies for long-term prophylaxis, which may potentially provide more consistent anticoagulant responses and reduce coagulation monitoring requirements, include the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), treatment with warfarin at a lower intensity, and the introduction of novel anticoagulants. The long-term use of LMWH has been found to be a particularly favorable treatment option for cancer patients in whom it is difficult to control the intensity of anticoagulation. In clinical trials, LMWH significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. The parenteral administration of the LMWHs, however, is a drawback for long-term use in the outpatient setting. A clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of long-term low-intensity warfarin treatment found this therapy to be better than placebo, but another study showed that conventional intensity warfarin was significantly more efficacious than low-intensity warfarin. New therapies in development that may offer improved safety-efficacy profiles are the synthetic pentasaccharides fondaparinux and idraparinux and the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. Parenterally administered fondaparinux has been shown to be as effective as LMWH for the acute treatment (5 to 7 days) of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Idraparinux, with once-weekly parenteral dosing, is currently being assessed in phase III clinical trials for the long-term secondary prevention of VTE. Ximelagatran is the first oral agent in the new class direct thrombin inhibitors. With a fast onset of action and oral administration, ximelagatran is a candidate for both acute and chronic therapy. The Thrombin Inhibitor in Venous Thromboembolism (THRIVE) clinical trial program has demonstrated that this agent has a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with standard therapy for the initial treatment (6 months) and secondary prevention (up to 18 months) of VTE. However, in a substantial proportion (6 to 13%) of patients given extended ximelagatran therapy, elevated serum transaminase enzymes developed, typically in the first 2 to 4 months of treatment. Even though these elevations usually abated without clinical sequelae whether or not treatment was continued, their clinical relevance remains unclear. In addition, locally reported coronary events occurred more frequently in ximelagatran-treated patients during the initial 6 months of treatment, the reason for which is yet unclear. The consistent anticoagulant response and fixed oral dosing without coagulation monitoring allows ximelagatran to overcome many of the limitations inherent to current treatment options for VTE treatment and secondary prevention, provided the problem of liver enzyme elevation and coronary events is resolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":87139,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in vascular medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"276-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-916167","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in vascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-916167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) currently involves a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulation. After cessation of therapy, however, recurrent venous thrombosis occurs at rates of 6 to 9% per year. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of extending anticoagulation beyond 3 months for the prevention of recurrent VTE events. Despite this, many eligible patients do not receive the required thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of recurrent VTE remains too high for a preventable condition. A reason for failure to use prophylaxis is the fear of bleeding complications with current oral anticoagulants such as warfarin. Warfarin has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile and a variable dose-response relationship that requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to maintain a target intensity that is both safe and effective. Alternative strategies for long-term prophylaxis, which may potentially provide more consistent anticoagulant responses and reduce coagulation monitoring requirements, include the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), treatment with warfarin at a lower intensity, and the introduction of novel anticoagulants. The long-term use of LMWH has been found to be a particularly favorable treatment option for cancer patients in whom it is difficult to control the intensity of anticoagulation. In clinical trials, LMWH significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. The parenteral administration of the LMWHs, however, is a drawback for long-term use in the outpatient setting. A clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of long-term low-intensity warfarin treatment found this therapy to be better than placebo, but another study showed that conventional intensity warfarin was significantly more efficacious than low-intensity warfarin. New therapies in development that may offer improved safety-efficacy profiles are the synthetic pentasaccharides fondaparinux and idraparinux and the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. Parenterally administered fondaparinux has been shown to be as effective as LMWH for the acute treatment (5 to 7 days) of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Idraparinux, with once-weekly parenteral dosing, is currently being assessed in phase III clinical trials for the long-term secondary prevention of VTE. Ximelagatran is the first oral agent in the new class direct thrombin inhibitors. With a fast onset of action and oral administration, ximelagatran is a candidate for both acute and chronic therapy. The Thrombin Inhibitor in Venous Thromboembolism (THRIVE) clinical trial program has demonstrated that this agent has a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with standard therapy for the initial treatment (6 months) and secondary prevention (up to 18 months) of VTE. However, in a substantial proportion (6 to 13%) of patients given extended ximelagatran therapy, elevated serum transaminase enzymes developed, typically in the first 2 to 4 months of treatment. Even though these elevations usually abated without clinical sequelae whether or not treatment was continued, their clinical relevance remains unclear. In addition, locally reported coronary events occurred more frequently in ximelagatran-treated patients during the initial 6 months of treatment, the reason for which is yet unclear. The consistent anticoagulant response and fixed oral dosing without coagulation monitoring allows ximelagatran to overcome many of the limitations inherent to current treatment options for VTE treatment and secondary prevention, provided the problem of liver enzyme elevation and coronary events is resolved.

静脉血栓栓塞患者的治疗:初始策略和长期二级预防。
静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的治疗目前需要至少3个月的抗凝治疗。然而,停止治疗后,静脉血栓复发率为每年6 - 9%。临床试验已经证明延长抗凝治疗超过3个月对于预防静脉血栓栓塞事件复发的益处。尽管如此,许多符合条件的患者没有接受必要的血栓预防治疗,静脉血栓栓塞复发的发生率对于可预防的疾病来说仍然太高。不采取预防措施的一个原因是担心目前口服抗凝剂如华法林会引起出血并发症。华法林具有不可预测的药代动力学特征和可变的剂量-反应关系,需要频繁的凝血监测和剂量调整以维持安全有效的目标强度。长期预防的替代策略可能提供更一致的抗凝反应并减少凝血监测需求,包括使用低分子肝素(LMWH)、低强度华法林治疗和引入新型抗凝剂。对于难以控制抗凝强度的癌症患者,长期使用低分子肝素是一种特别有利的治疗选择。在临床试验中,低分子肝素显著降低静脉血栓栓塞复发的风险,而不增加出血风险。然而,低分子肝素的肠外给药是门诊长期使用的一个缺点。一项评估长期低强度华法林治疗的疗效和安全性的临床试验发现,该疗法优于安慰剂,但另一项研究表明,常规强度华法林明显比低强度华法林更有效。正在开发的新疗法可能提供更好的安全性-有效性概况是合成五糖fondaparinux和idraparinux以及口服直接凝血酶抑制剂ximelagatran。对于症状性深静脉血栓的急性治疗(5 - 7天),经肠外给药fondaparinux已被证明与低分子肝素一样有效。Idraparinux每周一次肠外给药,目前正在进行静脉血栓栓塞长期二级预防的III期临床试验评估。Ximelagatran是第一类口服直接凝血酶抑制剂。由于起效快,口服给药,西美拉加群是急性和慢性治疗的候选药物。静脉血栓栓塞中的凝血酶抑制剂(THRIVE)临床试验项目表明,与标准疗法相比,该药物在静脉血栓栓塞的初始治疗(6个月)和二级预防(长达18个月)中具有良好的获益-风险特征。然而,在相当大比例(6%至13%)接受延长昔美加群治疗的患者中,血清转氨酶出现升高,通常发生在治疗的前2至4个月。尽管无论是否继续治疗,这些升高通常会减轻而无临床后遗症,但其临床相关性尚不清楚。此外,当地报告的冠状动脉事件在西美拉加群治疗的患者的最初6个月内发生的频率更高,其原因尚不清楚。一致的抗凝反应和无需凝血监测的固定口服剂量使ximelagatran克服了当前静脉血栓栓塞治疗和二级预防治疗方案固有的许多局限性,前提是肝酶升高和冠状动脉事件的问题得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信