The irrationality of the present use of the osmole gap: applicable physical chemistry principles and recommendations to improve the validity of current practices.

Yoshikata Koga, Roy A Purssell, Larry D Lynd
{"title":"The irrationality of the present use of the osmole gap: applicable physical chemistry principles and recommendations to improve the validity of current practices.","authors":"Yoshikata Koga,&nbsp;Roy A Purssell,&nbsp;Larry D Lynd","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200423030-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present clinical use of serum osmometry is erroneous in two respects. The first, and the most important, is the incorrect assumption that serum behaves as a dilute 'ideal' solution and that the osmotic activity of a substance depends solely on the number of solute particles. The amount of variance from ideal behaviour of serum containing an exogenous substance is expressed by the osmotic coefficient (phi). We have calculated the osmotic coefficient for serum containing ethanol (alcohol) and recommend that the osmotic coefficient for serum containing other low molecular weight substances such as methanol (methyl alcohol), isopropyl alcohol and ethylene glycol also be calculated. This is necessary for the accurate calculation of the contribution of these substances to the serum osmolality.Secondly, the practice of subtracting the calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not valid since it represents a mathematically improper expression. The units of these two terms are different. The 'osmole gap' (OG) is typically viewed as the difference between serum osmolality determined by an osmometer and the estimated total molarity of solute in serum by directly measuring the concentration of several substances and then substituting them into a published formula. Some authors call this sum the calculated or estimated osmolarity but, because the concentrations are measured directly and not with an osmometer, the calculated term represents molarity. The units of osmolality are mmol/kg of H2O and the units of molarity are mmol/L. Therefore, the practice of subtracting calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not mathematically sound and is an oversimplification for ease of application. This mathematical transgression necessarily adds an error to the incorrectly calculated OG. Despite this, the OG is commonly used in clinical medicine. Serum osmolality can be converted to molarity provided the weight percentage and the density of the solution are known and thus, we recommend that this conversion be done prior to calculation of the gap. We recommend that the gap between measured serum osmolarity and calculated serum molarity be called the 'osmolar gap'. After having corrected for non-ideality for serum and for inconsistency of units, the standard value and reference range for this gap must be determined in an adequate number of patient populations and in a variety of clinical settings. An example of this determination, using data from a group of ethanol-poisoned patients is given. This correction should be applied before the evaluation of the osmolar gap as a screening test for other low molecular weight substances proceeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"23 3","pages":"203-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200423030-00006","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200423030-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The present clinical use of serum osmometry is erroneous in two respects. The first, and the most important, is the incorrect assumption that serum behaves as a dilute 'ideal' solution and that the osmotic activity of a substance depends solely on the number of solute particles. The amount of variance from ideal behaviour of serum containing an exogenous substance is expressed by the osmotic coefficient (phi). We have calculated the osmotic coefficient for serum containing ethanol (alcohol) and recommend that the osmotic coefficient for serum containing other low molecular weight substances such as methanol (methyl alcohol), isopropyl alcohol and ethylene glycol also be calculated. This is necessary for the accurate calculation of the contribution of these substances to the serum osmolality.Secondly, the practice of subtracting the calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not valid since it represents a mathematically improper expression. The units of these two terms are different. The 'osmole gap' (OG) is typically viewed as the difference between serum osmolality determined by an osmometer and the estimated total molarity of solute in serum by directly measuring the concentration of several substances and then substituting them into a published formula. Some authors call this sum the calculated or estimated osmolarity but, because the concentrations are measured directly and not with an osmometer, the calculated term represents molarity. The units of osmolality are mmol/kg of H2O and the units of molarity are mmol/L. Therefore, the practice of subtracting calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not mathematically sound and is an oversimplification for ease of application. This mathematical transgression necessarily adds an error to the incorrectly calculated OG. Despite this, the OG is commonly used in clinical medicine. Serum osmolality can be converted to molarity provided the weight percentage and the density of the solution are known and thus, we recommend that this conversion be done prior to calculation of the gap. We recommend that the gap between measured serum osmolarity and calculated serum molarity be called the 'osmolar gap'. After having corrected for non-ideality for serum and for inconsistency of units, the standard value and reference range for this gap must be determined in an adequate number of patient populations and in a variety of clinical settings. An example of this determination, using data from a group of ethanol-poisoned patients is given. This correction should be applied before the evaluation of the osmolar gap as a screening test for other low molecular weight substances proceeds.

目前使用渗透压间隙的不合理性:适用的物理化学原理和建议,以提高当前做法的有效性。
目前临床使用的血清渗透法在两个方面是错误的。第一个,也是最重要的,是错误的假设,即血清表现为稀释的“理想”溶液,物质的渗透活性仅取决于溶质颗粒的数量。含有外源性物质的血清与理想行为的差异量用渗透系数(phi)表示。我们已经计算了含有乙醇(酒精)的血清的渗透系数,并建议也计算含有甲醇(甲醇)、异丙醇和乙二醇等其他低分子量物质的血清的渗透系数。这对于准确计算这些物质对血清渗透压的贡献是必要的。其次,从测量的血清渗透压中减去计算的血清摩尔浓度的做法是无效的,因为它代表了一个数学上不恰当的表达式。这两项的单位是不同的。“渗透压间隙”(OG)通常被视为由渗透计测定的血清渗透压与通过直接测量几种物质的浓度然后将其代入已发表的公式而估计的血清中溶质总摩尔浓度之间的差异。有些作者称这个总和为计算或估计的渗透压,但是,由于浓度是直接测量的,而不是用渗透压计,计算项代表摩尔浓度。渗透压的单位是mmol/kg H2O,摩尔浓度的单位是mmol/L。因此,从测量的血清渗透压中减去计算出的血清摩尔浓度的做法在数学上是不合理的,并且为了便于应用而过度简化。这种数学上的违背必然会给计算错误的OG增加一个误差。尽管如此,OG仍被广泛应用于临床医学。如果已知溶液的质量百分比和密度,则血清渗透压可以转换为摩尔浓度,因此,我们建议在计算间隙之前进行这种转换。我们建议将测定的血清渗透压和计算的血清摩尔浓度之间的差距称为“渗透压差距”。在纠正了血清的不理想性和单位的不一致之后,必须在足够数量的患者群体和各种临床环境中确定这一差距的标准值和参考范围。本文给出了使用一组乙醇中毒患者的数据进行这种测定的一个例子。在对渗透压间隙进行评估之前,应进行这种校正,以进行其他低分子量物质的筛选试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信