Digoxin-specific antibody fragments: how much and when?

D Nicholas Bateman
{"title":"Digoxin-specific antibody fragments: how much and when?","authors":"D Nicholas Bateman","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200423030-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalis glycoside poisoning is an important clinical problem and the development of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab) 30 years ago has changed clinical practice. Nevertheless, doubts still exist as to the appropriate dose indications for therapy. This paper reviews relevant literature, describes the difficulties associated with current treatment protocols and proposes an approach to therapy, which is based on theoretical principles and evidence gleaned from currently available clinical data sets. In patients with 'acute' poisoning, serum digoxin concentrations do not equate to the total body burden, as tissue distribution will not have occurred, and the calculations for present protocols, which use serum concentrations, are therefore likely to result in too much antibody being administered. Since a therapeutic quantity of digoxin will have little effect in a normal individual, complete neutralisation of all digoxin is also unnecessary. The pharmacokinetic and dynamic logic of using a smaller initial loading dose than predicted from total body calculations is rational. It is recommended that half the calculated loading dose, either based on serum concentration or history, should be administered and the impact on clinical features observed. If a clinical response is not seen within 1-2 hours, a further similar dose should be given. In the event of a full response, patients should be monitored for 6-12 hours; a second dose should only be given in the event of recurrence of toxicity. In patients with 'chronic' digoxin poisoning, the serum digoxin concentration will reflect the total body load. However, since such patients are invariably receiving digoxin for therapeutic purposes, full neutralisation is again not indicated. In addition, tissue redistribution of digoxin from deeper stores will occur following the binding of biologically active digoxin in the circulation. This process will occur over a number of hours and if the total calculated dose of antibody is administered in a single bolus, significant quantities will be excreted prior to redistribution of digoxin. Pharmacokinetic logic, therefore, suggests that half the calculated loading dose, based on serum concentration, should be administered and the impact on clinical features observed; a second dose should be given in the event of recurrence of toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"23 3","pages":"135-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200423030-00001","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200423030-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Digitalis glycoside poisoning is an important clinical problem and the development of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab) 30 years ago has changed clinical practice. Nevertheless, doubts still exist as to the appropriate dose indications for therapy. This paper reviews relevant literature, describes the difficulties associated with current treatment protocols and proposes an approach to therapy, which is based on theoretical principles and evidence gleaned from currently available clinical data sets. In patients with 'acute' poisoning, serum digoxin concentrations do not equate to the total body burden, as tissue distribution will not have occurred, and the calculations for present protocols, which use serum concentrations, are therefore likely to result in too much antibody being administered. Since a therapeutic quantity of digoxin will have little effect in a normal individual, complete neutralisation of all digoxin is also unnecessary. The pharmacokinetic and dynamic logic of using a smaller initial loading dose than predicted from total body calculations is rational. It is recommended that half the calculated loading dose, either based on serum concentration or history, should be administered and the impact on clinical features observed. If a clinical response is not seen within 1-2 hours, a further similar dose should be given. In the event of a full response, patients should be monitored for 6-12 hours; a second dose should only be given in the event of recurrence of toxicity. In patients with 'chronic' digoxin poisoning, the serum digoxin concentration will reflect the total body load. However, since such patients are invariably receiving digoxin for therapeutic purposes, full neutralisation is again not indicated. In addition, tissue redistribution of digoxin from deeper stores will occur following the binding of biologically active digoxin in the circulation. This process will occur over a number of hours and if the total calculated dose of antibody is administered in a single bolus, significant quantities will be excreted prior to redistribution of digoxin. Pharmacokinetic logic, therefore, suggests that half the calculated loading dose, based on serum concentration, should be administered and the impact on clinical features observed; a second dose should be given in the event of recurrence of toxicity.

地高辛特异性抗体片段:多少,何时?
洋地黄苷中毒是一个重要的临床问题,30年前地高辛特异性抗体片段(Fab)的发展改变了临床实践。然而,对于治疗的适当剂量指征仍然存在疑问。本文回顾了相关文献,描述了与当前治疗方案相关的困难,并提出了一种基于理论原则和从当前可用的临床数据集收集的证据的治疗方法。在“急性”中毒患者中,血清地高辛浓度不等于全身负荷,因为不会发生组织分布,并且目前方案的计算使用血清浓度,因此可能导致施用过多的抗体。由于治疗量的地高辛对正常个体的影响很小,所以完全中和所有地高辛也是不必要的。在药代动力学和动力学逻辑上,使用比全身计算预测的更小的初始负荷剂量是合理的。建议根据血清浓度或病史,给予计算负荷剂量的一半,并观察对临床特征的影响。如果在1-2小时内未见临床反应,应进一步给予类似剂量。在完全缓解的情况下,应监测患者6-12小时;只有在毒性复发时才应给予第二次剂量。在“慢性”地高辛中毒患者中,血清地高辛浓度将反映全身负荷。然而,由于这些患者总是为了治疗目的而接受地高辛,因此也不建议完全中和。此外,地高辛在血液循环中与生物活性地高辛结合后,会从深层储存地高辛的组织中重新分布。这一过程将在数小时内发生,如果计算出的抗体总剂量是单次给药,在地高辛重新分配之前,大量的抗体将被排出体外。因此,药代动力学逻辑建议,根据血清浓度计算出的负荷剂量的一半应该给予,并观察对临床特征的影响;如果再次出现毒性,应给予第二次剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信