Anthropoaesthetics as an aspect of anthropoecology.

Natalya I Haldeyeva, Alexander A Zubov
{"title":"Anthropoaesthetics as an aspect of anthropoecology.","authors":"Natalya I Haldeyeva,&nbsp;Alexander A Zubov","doi":"10.2114/jpa.24.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The source of activity of every individual or group is to a great extent determined by the necessity of interaction with other individuals or groups (Afanasiev, 1990), i.e. with the diversity of anthropological surroundings. This manifests itself in the participation of individuals in the organization of their ecosystems, including the ethnocultural and physical conditions of life (Sukharev, 1998). Therefore it is possible to single out certain ecological aspects of perception of anthropological specificity of the surrounding population by an individual (group), leaning upon the definition of anthropoecology as a discipline, studying the laws of interaction between human communities and the system of natural, social and other factors, (Anthropological dictionary, 2004) as well as the coevolution of humans with their environment, in the process of adaptation (Lisseyev, 2001). At the same time it is usually emphasized that the ecological approach is best of all realized on the base of the principle of reciprocity of development of an individual and the surrounding reality, on the perception of the objects of this reality (including other people) with due regard to the reasons for the preference and corresponding values orientation. This represents the subject of ecological psychology (Sergeyenko, 2002; Pavlenko, 2002). In this context the relations between the individual and the environment (autoecology) as well as between the individual and a group (sinecology) are considered (Lisseyev, 2001). The study of the aesthetic perception of anthropological types by individuals belonging to different ethnoterritorial and age groups is the subject matter of a special branch of physical anthropology-anthropoaesthetics, which studies the peculiarities of the aesthetic preference of human facial features in modern populations, analyzing the dependence of human perception on the anthropological environment (Haldeyeva, 2004).</p>","PeriodicalId":80293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science","volume":"24 4","pages":"351-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/jpa.24.351","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.24.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The source of activity of every individual or group is to a great extent determined by the necessity of interaction with other individuals or groups (Afanasiev, 1990), i.e. with the diversity of anthropological surroundings. This manifests itself in the participation of individuals in the organization of their ecosystems, including the ethnocultural and physical conditions of life (Sukharev, 1998). Therefore it is possible to single out certain ecological aspects of perception of anthropological specificity of the surrounding population by an individual (group), leaning upon the definition of anthropoecology as a discipline, studying the laws of interaction between human communities and the system of natural, social and other factors, (Anthropological dictionary, 2004) as well as the coevolution of humans with their environment, in the process of adaptation (Lisseyev, 2001). At the same time it is usually emphasized that the ecological approach is best of all realized on the base of the principle of reciprocity of development of an individual and the surrounding reality, on the perception of the objects of this reality (including other people) with due regard to the reasons for the preference and corresponding values orientation. This represents the subject of ecological psychology (Sergeyenko, 2002; Pavlenko, 2002). In this context the relations between the individual and the environment (autoecology) as well as between the individual and a group (sinecology) are considered (Lisseyev, 2001). The study of the aesthetic perception of anthropological types by individuals belonging to different ethnoterritorial and age groups is the subject matter of a special branch of physical anthropology-anthropoaesthetics, which studies the peculiarities of the aesthetic preference of human facial features in modern populations, analyzing the dependence of human perception on the anthropological environment (Haldeyeva, 2004).

人类美学是人类生态学的一个方面。
每个个体或群体的活动来源在很大程度上取决于与其他个体或群体互动的必要性(Afanasiev, 1990),即与人类学环境的多样性。这表现在个人参与其生态系统的组织,包括种族文化和生活的物质条件(Sukharev, 1998)。因此,依靠人类生态学作为一门学科的定义,研究人类社区与自然、社会和其他因素系统之间的相互作用规律(人类学词典,2004年)以及人类在适应过程中与环境的共同进化(Lisseyev, 2001年),有可能挑出个人(群体)对周围人口的人类学特异性感知的某些生态方面。与此同时,通常强调的是,生态方法最好是在个人和周围现实发展互惠原则的基础上实现的,在对这种现实对象(包括其他人)的感知上,适当考虑到偏好的原因和相应的价值取向。这代表了生态心理学的主题(Sergeyenko, 2002;Pavlenko, 2002)。在这种背景下,考虑了个人与环境之间的关系(自生态学)以及个人与群体之间的关系(sinecology) (Lisseyev, 2001)。不同民族、不同地域、不同年龄的个体对人类学类型的审美感知的研究是体质人类学的一个特殊分支——人类美学的研究主题,它研究现代人群对人类面部特征的审美偏好的特殊性,分析人类感知对人类学环境的依赖性(Haldeyeva, 2004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信