Epidemiology and statistical methods in prediction of patient outcome.

David G Bostwick, Jan Adolfsson, Harry B Burke, Jan-Erik Damber, Hartwig Huland, Michele Pavone-Macaluso, David J Waters
{"title":"Epidemiology and statistical methods in prediction of patient outcome.","authors":"David G Bostwick,&nbsp;Jan Adolfsson,&nbsp;Harry B Burke,&nbsp;Jan-Erik Damber,&nbsp;Hartwig Huland,&nbsp;Michele Pavone-Macaluso,&nbsp;David J Waters","doi":"10.1080/03008880510030969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial gaps exist in the data of the assessment of risk and prognosis that limit our understanding of the complex mechanisms that contribute to the greatest cancer epidemic, prostate cancer, of our time. This report was prepared by an international multidisciplinary committee of the World Health Organization to address contemporary issues of epidemiology and statistical methods in prostate cancer, including a summary of current risk assessment methods and prognostic factors. Emphasis was placed on the relative merits of each of the statistical methods available. We concluded that: 1. An international committee should be created to guide the assessment and validation of molecular biomarkers. The goal is to achieve more precise identification of those who would benefit from treatment. 2. Prostate cancer is a predictable disease despite its biologic heterogeneity. However, the accuracy of predicting it must be improved. We expect that more precise statistical methods will supplant the current staging system. The simplicity and intuitive ease of using the current staging system must be balanced against the serious compromise in accuracy for the individual patient. 3. The most useful new statistical approaches will integrate molecular biomarkers with existing prognostic factors to predict conditional life expectancy (i.e. the expected remaining years of a patient's life) and take into account all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":76529,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","volume":" 216","pages":"94-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03008880510030969","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880510030969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Substantial gaps exist in the data of the assessment of risk and prognosis that limit our understanding of the complex mechanisms that contribute to the greatest cancer epidemic, prostate cancer, of our time. This report was prepared by an international multidisciplinary committee of the World Health Organization to address contemporary issues of epidemiology and statistical methods in prostate cancer, including a summary of current risk assessment methods and prognostic factors. Emphasis was placed on the relative merits of each of the statistical methods available. We concluded that: 1. An international committee should be created to guide the assessment and validation of molecular biomarkers. The goal is to achieve more precise identification of those who would benefit from treatment. 2. Prostate cancer is a predictable disease despite its biologic heterogeneity. However, the accuracy of predicting it must be improved. We expect that more precise statistical methods will supplant the current staging system. The simplicity and intuitive ease of using the current staging system must be balanced against the serious compromise in accuracy for the individual patient. 3. The most useful new statistical approaches will integrate molecular biomarkers with existing prognostic factors to predict conditional life expectancy (i.e. the expected remaining years of a patient's life) and take into account all-cause mortality.

预测患者预后的流行病学和统计学方法。
风险和预后评估的数据存在巨大差距,限制了我们对导致我们这个时代最严重的癌症流行病——前列腺癌的复杂机制的理解。本报告由世界卫生组织的一个国际多学科委员会编写,旨在解决前列腺癌流行病学和统计方法的当代问题,包括对当前风险评估方法和预后因素的总结。重点放在现有的每一种统计方法的相对优点上。我们得出结论:1。应该建立一个国际委员会来指导分子生物标志物的评估和验证。其目标是更精确地确定哪些人将从治疗中受益。2. 前列腺癌是一种可预测的疾病,尽管其生物学异质性。然而,预测的准确性必须提高。我们期望更精确的统计方法将取代目前的分期系统。使用当前分期系统的简单性和直观性必须与个体患者准确性的严重妥协相平衡。3.最有用的新统计方法将把分子生物标志物与现有的预后因素结合起来,以预测有条件的预期寿命(即患者预期的剩余寿命),并考虑到全因死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信