Localization of interictal spikes using SAM(g2) and dipole fit.

S E Robinson, S S Nagarajan, M Mantle, V Gibbons, H Kirsch
{"title":"Localization of interictal spikes using SAM(g2) and dipole fit.","authors":"S E Robinson, S S Nagarajan, M Mantle, V Gibbons, H Kirsch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SAM(g2) is an automated analysis that transforms the MEG data into a functional image of spike-like activity, giving the source waveforms for those locations. Since the source waveforms estimated by SAM have higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than does the raw MEG data, it is possible to automatically mark the location and timing of each spike for comparisons with dipole fit procedures. Both SAM(g2) and equivalent current dipole (ECD) fits were used to analyze MEG interictal spike recordings in 10 patients with cortical dysplasias and medial temporal lobe epilepsy. The ECD fit locations obtained by manual spike classification and latency marking were compared with those found by automated SAM(g2) procedures. When the SNR of interictal activity was high (compared to the background) with a clear single focus, there was excellent agreement between the ECD cluster location and the SAM(g2) maximum. However, when the SNR of spikes was low, manual single ECD location scatter was larger than SAM(g2) reconstructions. When multiple independent interictal spike loci were present, there was some disagreement between SAM(g2) and ECD scatter in the cases of low SNR spikes. When SAM(g2) indicated multiple coupled spike loci, the residual variance for the dipole fit was high and its scatter unacceptably large--even for multiple dipole models. This study demonstrates that SAM(g2) is equivalent to ECD fit for localizing interictal spikes when there is a single locus and good SNR. Further studies are required to validate cases in which there are multiple spike loci or poor SNR.</p>","PeriodicalId":83814,"journal":{"name":"Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN","volume":"2004 ","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041981/pdf/nihms-23495.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SAM(g2) is an automated analysis that transforms the MEG data into a functional image of spike-like activity, giving the source waveforms for those locations. Since the source waveforms estimated by SAM have higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than does the raw MEG data, it is possible to automatically mark the location and timing of each spike for comparisons with dipole fit procedures. Both SAM(g2) and equivalent current dipole (ECD) fits were used to analyze MEG interictal spike recordings in 10 patients with cortical dysplasias and medial temporal lobe epilepsy. The ECD fit locations obtained by manual spike classification and latency marking were compared with those found by automated SAM(g2) procedures. When the SNR of interictal activity was high (compared to the background) with a clear single focus, there was excellent agreement between the ECD cluster location and the SAM(g2) maximum. However, when the SNR of spikes was low, manual single ECD location scatter was larger than SAM(g2) reconstructions. When multiple independent interictal spike loci were present, there was some disagreement between SAM(g2) and ECD scatter in the cases of low SNR spikes. When SAM(g2) indicated multiple coupled spike loci, the residual variance for the dipole fit was high and its scatter unacceptably large--even for multiple dipole models. This study demonstrates that SAM(g2) is equivalent to ECD fit for localizing interictal spikes when there is a single locus and good SNR. Further studies are required to validate cases in which there are multiple spike loci or poor SNR.

利用SAM(g2)和偶极子拟合定位间隙尖峰。
SAM(g2)是一种自动分析,它将脑磁图数据转换成类似峰状活动的功能图像,给出这些位置的源波形。由于SAM估计的源波形比原始MEG数据具有更高的信噪比(SNR),因此可以自动标记每个尖峰的位置和时间,以便与偶极子拟合程序进行比较。采用SAM(g2)和等效电流偶极子(ECD)拟合分析10例皮质发育不良合并内侧颞叶癫痫患者的脑磁图间峰记录。通过手动尖峰分类和延迟标记获得的ECD拟合位置与自动SAM(g2)程序发现的ECD拟合位置进行比较。当间歇期活动的信噪比高(与背景相比)且有明确的单一焦点时,ECD簇位置与SAM(g2)最大值之间存在极好的一致性。然而,当峰值信噪比较低时,人工单ECD位置散射大于SAM(g2)重建。当存在多个独立的间隔尖峰位点时,在低信噪比尖峰的情况下,SAM(g2)和ECD散点之间存在一些不一致。当SAM(g2)显示多个耦合尖峰位点时,偶极子拟合的剩余方差很高,其散点大得令人无法接受——即使对于多个偶极子模型也是如此。本研究表明,当存在单个位点且信噪比良好时,SAM(g2)相当于ECD适合于定位间隔尖峰。需要进一步的研究来验证存在多个尖峰位点或低信噪比的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信