Numerical calculation of eddy currents in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychiatric treatment.

M Sekino, S Ueno
{"title":"Numerical calculation of eddy currents in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychiatric treatment.","authors":"M Sekino,&nbsp;S Ueno","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, current distributions in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were calculated under various conditions and compared with the current distribution in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in order to find an optimum condition of TMS as an alternative to ECT. Current distributions in TMS were obtained for the following coil shapes and coil diameters: circular coils of 50 mm, 75 mm, 100 mm, 125 mm, and 150 mm, and figure-eight coils of 50 mm, 75 mm, 100 mm, and 125 mm. Evaluative performance function F increases with the difference in current distributions between ECT and TMS. The minimum value of F decreased with an increase in the coil diameter. In the case of a 150-mm circular coil, the performance function had a minimum value of 0.40 at a coil current of 29 kA, which corresponded to a magnetic flux density of 0.24 T. A coil position on the forehead and the use of a large circular coil gave better results.</p>","PeriodicalId":83814,"journal":{"name":"Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN","volume":"2004 ","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, current distributions in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were calculated under various conditions and compared with the current distribution in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in order to find an optimum condition of TMS as an alternative to ECT. Current distributions in TMS were obtained for the following coil shapes and coil diameters: circular coils of 50 mm, 75 mm, 100 mm, 125 mm, and 150 mm, and figure-eight coils of 50 mm, 75 mm, 100 mm, and 125 mm. Evaluative performance function F increases with the difference in current distributions between ECT and TMS. The minimum value of F decreased with an increase in the coil diameter. In the case of a 150-mm circular coil, the performance function had a minimum value of 0.40 at a coil current of 29 kA, which corresponded to a magnetic flux density of 0.24 T. A coil position on the forehead and the use of a large circular coil gave better results.

经颅磁刺激治疗精神疾病涡流的数值计算。
本研究计算了经颅磁刺激(TMS)在不同条件下的电流分布,并与电痉挛治疗(ECT)的电流分布进行了比较,以期找到TMS替代ECT的最佳条件。得到了以下线圈形状和线圈直径的TMS电流分布:圆形线圈为50mm、75mm、100mm、125mm和150mm, 8字形线圈为50mm、75mm、100mm和125mm。评价性能函数F随着电刺激与经颅磁刺激电流分布的差异而增大。最小F值随线圈直径的增大而减小。在150毫米圆形线圈的情况下,在线圈电流为29 kA时,性能函数的最小值为0.40,对应于0.24 t的磁通密度。在额头上放置线圈和使用大圆形线圈效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信