Echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves at rest and exercise.

C Schmidtke, D Poppe, G Dahmen, H-H Sievers
{"title":"Echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves at rest and exercise.","authors":"C Schmidtke,&nbsp;D Poppe,&nbsp;G Dahmen,&nbsp;H-H Sievers","doi":"10.1007/s00392-005-0241-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repair of diseased bicuspid aortic valves has gained increasing interest as an alternative to conventional valve replacement. Hemodynamic data at exercise have not been reported before. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and echocardiographic status of patients after bicuspid aortic valve repair at rest and exercise. Between 03/94 and 09/02 a reconstruction of an incompetent bicuspid aortic valve was performed in 25 patients (mean age 35+/-12.1 years, group A, mean insufficiency 2.8 preoperatively). Patients were investigated clinically and echocardiographically after 2.1+/-2.4 (0.1-8.9) years at rest and exercise and compared to 20 controls (group B). Clinical followup was complete. There were no deaths, reoperations, thromboembolic or bleeding complications. At last examination 21 patients were in NYHA class I, n=4 in NYHA class II and mean aortic valve insufficiency (AI) was 1.0 with one patient having an AI>II degrees. Maximum and mean pressure gradient (dPmax/mean) across the aortic valve at rest were 14+/-5.5/7+/-2.6 mmHg for patients of group A and 7+/-2.5/3.6+/-1.1 mmHg in group B. Mean AVA at rest was 2.6+/-0.8 (group A) vs 2.9+/-0.6 cm(2) (group B, p=0.025), valvular resistance 13.4+/-4.8 (group A) vs 13.6+/-2.9 dyn x s x cm(-5) (group B, p>0.05). All individuals were stressed up to 100 W (dPmax/mean 21+/-6.8/11+/-3.6, group A vs 11+/-2.9/6+/-1.3 mmHg, group B). 56% of group A and 85% of group B could be stressed up to 175 W with dPmax/mean 24.5+/-8.3/12+/-4.2 and 16+/-3.6/8+/-1.4 mmHg, respectively (p<0. 01). Heart rate and blood pressure behavior were comparable. Left ventricular mass regression (preoperatively 369.3+/-76.4 vs 277.3+/-80.7 g at last examination, p<0.01) was significant in group A but did not reach normal values (group B, 227.8+/-71.1; p<0.01). Bicuspid aortic valve reconstruction reduces left ventricular volume load significantly. Although residual mild subclinical obstruction and incompetence were observed, the behavior of hemodynamics at exercise was comparable to controls. The clinical relevance of these findings in long term follow-up has to be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":23757,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","volume":"94 7","pages":"437-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00392-005-0241-2","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0241-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Repair of diseased bicuspid aortic valves has gained increasing interest as an alternative to conventional valve replacement. Hemodynamic data at exercise have not been reported before. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and echocardiographic status of patients after bicuspid aortic valve repair at rest and exercise. Between 03/94 and 09/02 a reconstruction of an incompetent bicuspid aortic valve was performed in 25 patients (mean age 35+/-12.1 years, group A, mean insufficiency 2.8 preoperatively). Patients were investigated clinically and echocardiographically after 2.1+/-2.4 (0.1-8.9) years at rest and exercise and compared to 20 controls (group B). Clinical followup was complete. There were no deaths, reoperations, thromboembolic or bleeding complications. At last examination 21 patients were in NYHA class I, n=4 in NYHA class II and mean aortic valve insufficiency (AI) was 1.0 with one patient having an AI>II degrees. Maximum and mean pressure gradient (dPmax/mean) across the aortic valve at rest were 14+/-5.5/7+/-2.6 mmHg for patients of group A and 7+/-2.5/3.6+/-1.1 mmHg in group B. Mean AVA at rest was 2.6+/-0.8 (group A) vs 2.9+/-0.6 cm(2) (group B, p=0.025), valvular resistance 13.4+/-4.8 (group A) vs 13.6+/-2.9 dyn x s x cm(-5) (group B, p>0.05). All individuals were stressed up to 100 W (dPmax/mean 21+/-6.8/11+/-3.6, group A vs 11+/-2.9/6+/-1.3 mmHg, group B). 56% of group A and 85% of group B could be stressed up to 175 W with dPmax/mean 24.5+/-8.3/12+/-4.2 and 16+/-3.6/8+/-1.4 mmHg, respectively (p<0. 01). Heart rate and blood pressure behavior were comparable. Left ventricular mass regression (preoperatively 369.3+/-76.4 vs 277.3+/-80.7 g at last examination, p<0.01) was significant in group A but did not reach normal values (group B, 227.8+/-71.1; p<0.01). Bicuspid aortic valve reconstruction reduces left ventricular volume load significantly. Although residual mild subclinical obstruction and incompetence were observed, the behavior of hemodynamics at exercise was comparable to controls. The clinical relevance of these findings in long term follow-up has to be evaluated.

重建二尖瓣静息和运动时的超声心动图和血流动力学特征。
修复病变的二尖瓣主动脉瓣作为传统瓣膜置换术的替代方法已引起越来越多的关注。运动时的血流动力学数据以前没有报道过。本研究旨在探讨静息和运动状态下二尖瓣主动脉瓣修复术后患者的临床和超声心动图状况。在1994年3月至2002年9月间,25例患者(平均年龄35±12.1岁,a组,术前平均功能不全2.8岁)进行了双尖瓣重建。患者在休息和运动2.1+/-2.4(0.1-8.9)年后进行临床和超声心动图调查,并与20名对照组(B组)进行比较。临床随访完成。无死亡、再手术、血栓栓塞或出血并发症。最后检查21例患者为NYHA I级,4例为NYHA II级,平均主动脉瓣功能不全(AI)为1.0,其中AI>II级1例。静息时主动脉瓣最大和平均压力梯度(dPmax/mean) A组为14+/-5.5/7+/-2.6 mmHg, B组为7+/-2.5/3.6+/-1.1 mmHg。静息时平均AVA为2.6+/-0.8 (A组)vs 2.9+/-0.6 cm(2) (B组,p=0.025),瓣阻为13.4+/-4.8 (A组)vs 13.6+/-2.9 dyn x s x cm(-5) (B组,p>0.05)。所有个体的压力都高达100 W (dPmax/平均值21+/-6.8/11+/-3.6,A组vs 11+/-2.9/6+/-1.3 mmHg, B组)。56%的A组和85%的B组可以承受高达175 W的压力,dPmax/平均值分别为24.5+/-8.3/12+/-4.2和16+/-3.6/8+/-1.4 mmHg
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信